This page has been archived and is no longer updated
Influenza: lessons from past pandemics, warnings from current incidents
Author: T. Horimoto
Keywords
Keywords for this Article
Add keywords to your Content
Save
|
Cancel
Share
|
Cancel
Revoke
|
Cancel
Rate & Certify
Rate Me...
Rate Me
!
Comment
Save
|
Cancel
Flag Inappropriate
The Content is
Objectionable
Explicit
Offensive
Inaccurate
Comment
Flag Content
|
Cancel
Delete Content
Reason
Delete
|
Cancel
Close
Full Screen
"� 2005 Nature Publishing Group *Division of Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and ? International Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan. � Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan. || Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin?Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. Correspondence to Y.K. e-mail: kawaoka@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp doi:10.1038/nrmicro1208 INFLUENZA: LESSONS FROM PAST PANDEMICS, WARNINGS FROM CURRENT INCIDENTS Taisuke Horimoto* � and Yoshihiro Kawaoka* ?�|| Abstract | Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus infections (H5 and H7 subtypes) in poultry and in humans (through direct contact with infected birds) have had important economic repercussions and have raised concerns that a new influenza pandemic will occur in the near future. The eradication of pathogenic avian influenza viruses seems to be the most effective way to prevent influenza pandemics, although this strategy has not proven successful so far. Here, we review the molecular factors that contribute to the emergence of pandemic strains. Influenza viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family. Antigenic differences in their nucleoprotein (NP) and matrix protein (M1) allow influenza viruses to be classified as types A, B or C (FIG. 1). For type A viruses, further subtyping is based on the antigenicity of the HAEMAGGLUTININ (HA) and NEURAMINIDASE (NA) surface glycoproteins 1 . Currently, 16 HA (H1?H16) and 9 NA (N1?N9) subtypes have been identified in type A viruses 2,3 . Type A influenza viruses have been isolated from various animals, including humans, pigs, horses, sea mammals and birds. Phylogenetic studies of type A isolates have revealed that the viral genes form species-specific lineages, and aquatic birds are thought to be the source of all influenza A viruses in other ani- mal species 4 . Influenza viruses usually do not produce disease in wild aquatic birds, indicating that they have achieved an optimal level of adaptation in this natu- ral reservoir. All 16 HA and 9 NA subtypes of type A viruses are maintained in aquatic bird populations, especially ducks, shorebirds and gulls 4 . Past influenza pandemics Spanish influenza (1918?1919). The so-called Spanish influenza was caused by an H1N1 virus and was responsible for the deaths of at least 40 million people in 1918?1919 uniF6AEREF. 5uniF6AF. Although its clinical symptoms and pathological manifestations were largely confined to the respiratory tract 6 , almost 50% of deaths (the case mortality rate in the USA averaged 2.5%) occurred in an unusually young age group, 20?40-year-olds 7 . The biological properties of the virus that was responsible for the Spanish influenza still remain obscure, owing to the lack of viral isolates available for study. However, the available data on gene sequences of the 1918 virus, obtained from lung tissue samples, suggest ?an unusual avian precursor? 8 (FIG. 2). The three-dimensional struc- ture of the HA of the 1918 virus indicates that, despite retaining the residues in the host-receptor-binding site that are characteristic of an avian precursor HA 9,10 , the 1918 virus HA could bind human cell-surface receptors, an observation that is consistent with recep- tor-binding assays carried out with a recombinant virus carrying the HA from the 1918 virus 11 . Recent studies with viruses generated by REVERSE GENETICS that carry genes derived from the 1918 virus indicate that the HA of this virus had a role in its increased virulence in a mouse model 11?13 . Indeed, the lung infiltration by inflammatory cells and the haemorrhagic pneumonia seen in these mice were hallmarks of the illness in humans in the original PANDEMIC 11,13 . Other pandemics. Other, less serious pandemics occurred in 1957 (Asian influenza, H2N2), 1968 (Hong Kong influenza, H3N2), and 1977 (Russian influenza, H1N1) 14 . The 1957 virus consisted of HA (H2), NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 3 | AUGUST 2005 | 591 REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group M2 PB2 PB1 PA PA HA NP NA M NS M1 NA HA NP Negative- sense ssRNA PB1 PB2 HAEMAGGLUTININ Type I integral membrane glycoprotein that binds to cell-surface receptors and facilitates fusion between the viral envelope and endosomal membrane. It is the main target antigen of the humoral immune response in host animals. NEURAMINIDASE Type II integral membrane glycoprotein, which facilitates viral release from cells by removing sialic acid from sialyloligosaccharides on the cell and viral surface. REVERSE GENETICS A method that allows the production of viruses that possess genes derived from cloned cDNA. PANDEMIC Global influenza infection caused by the emergence of a virus with an HA subtype to which most of the human population lacks immunity. REASSORTANT A virus with gene segments derived from more than one virus, achieved by co-infection of a single cell by these viruses. NA (N2) and a viral RNA polymerase gene segment, PB1 (polymerase basic 1), from an avian virus, with the other gene segments derived from a previously circulating human virus 15,16 . The 1968 virus had avian HA (H3) and PB1 segments in a background of human viral genes 15,16 . The acquisition of avian surface anti- gens allowed these viruses to circumvent the human immune response. Why both of these pandemic strains also carried the gene that encodes PB1 from an avian virus remains unclear. In view of a recently identified North American swine virus, a triple REASSORTANT that combined swine, human and avian viral genes and possessed the genes that encode PB1 and HA from the same human virus 17 , one could argue that the genes that encode HA and PB1 interact functionally, either at a protein or nucleic acid level, in ways that enhance the replicative ability of hybrid viruses. The Russian influenza H1N1 strain was essentially identical to those H1N1 strains that had circulated in humans in the 1950s (FIG. 2) uniF6AEREF. 18uniF6AF, and it is thought likely that the virus was maintained in a freezer until it was somehow reintroduced into the general popula- tion. The magnitude of this outbreak was limited, as most individuals over 27 years of age had some immunological memory to the virus. Properties of avian influenza viruses Influenza pandemics are caused by viruses that possess an HA molecule to which most of the population lacks immunity. Recently, purely avian influenza viruses, including the H5N1, H9N2 and H7N7 subtypes, have been directly transmitted to humans, raising concern over the possibility of a new influenza pandemic among the world?s immunologically naive populations. As the viruses responsible for pandemics in the past century were all characterized by the acquisition of HAs from avian viruses, with the exception of the Russian influ- enza virus, clues to the molecular changes that give rise to human pandemic strains can be found in the avian reservoir. Avian influenza viruses can be sorted on the basis of virulence: highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses cause systemic lethal infection, killing birds as soon as 24 hours post-infection, and usually within one week, whereas low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses rarely generate outbreaks of severe disease in the field, and their associated morbidity and mortality rates are lower than those of HPAI viruses 4 . Phylogenetic studies of avian influenza viruses have revealed two geographically separate sublineages (Eurasian and American), which probably reflects the separation of viruses owing to the distinct migratory patterns of the host birds in these two regions. Both HPAI and LPAI viruses are found within these two sublineages, indicating that viral pathogenicity is not determined by geographical distribution. Without exception, all of the HPAI viruses belong to the H5 or H7 subtype, for reasons that are still unclear. There do not seem to be any associations of specific NA subtypes with HPAI viruses. Susceptibility and pathology. Many domestic and wild avian species are susceptible to influenza virus infection, although viruses that are highly pathogenic in one avian species might not be pathogenic in another 19 . For exam- ple, ducks tend not to succumb to viruses that are lethal in chickens, even though virus can be detected in vari- ous internal organs and in the blood of infected ducks. Among domestic avian species, chickens and turkeys are the most frequently involved in outbreaks of HPAI- virus-related disease. The host factors that determine differences in susceptibility to avian influenza viruses in different avian species are unknown. LPAI viruses replicate mainly in intestinal and res- piratory organs, and are shed in the faeces of infected birds. Therefore, transmission of viruses through the faecal-contaminated-water?oral route is an impor- tant mechanism of LPAI-virus dissemination among aquatic birds. High concentrations of HPAI viruses, which replicate systemically in poultry, are also shed in faeces. However, these viruses are more readily transmitted among birds in densely populated flocks by the nasal and oral routes through contact with virus-contaminated materials. LPAI viruses cause localized infections in the respiratory and/or intesti- nal tract, resulting in mild or asymptomatic infection. In chickens infected with HPAI viruses, common symptoms include swelling of the microvascular endo- thelium, multifocal haemorrhages and thrombosis 19,20 . HPAI viruses can replicate efficiently in vascular endothelial and perivascular parenchymatous cells, which aids viral dissemination and systemic infec- tion. Additionally, involvement of the cardiovascular system is indicated, as HPAI antigens have been found in necrotic cardiac myocytes 21 . Figure 1 | Schematic diagram of an influenza A virus virion. Two surface glycoproteins, haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), and the M2 ion-channel protein are embedded in the viral envelope, which is derived from the host plasma membrane. The ribonucleoprotein complex comprises a viral RNA segment associated with the nucleoprotein (NP) and three polymerase proteins (PA, PB1 and PB2). The matrix (M1) protein is associated with both ribonucleoprotein and the viral envelope. A small amount of non-structural protein 2 is also present, but its location within the virion is unknown. 592 | AUGUST 2005 | VOLUME 3 www.nature.com/reviews/micro REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group H1N1 1918 Spanish influenza H1N1 1950 H1N1 1977 Russian influenza H1N1 H1N1 1957 Asian influenza H2N2 1968 Hong Kong influenza H3N2 H3N2 H5N1 H7N7 ? ? ? H9N2 H2N2 H3N? HA and pathogenicity. The HA surface glycoprotein mediates virus binding to host-cell receptors and pro- motes the release of the viral RNA that is complexed with polymerase and NP (ribonucleoprotein, RNP) through membrane fusion. A precursor HA molecule undergoes post-translational cleavage into HA1 and HA2 subunits by host proteases, with the generation of a fusogenic domain at the amino terminus of HA2 that mediates fusion between the viral envelope and the endosomal membrane 22 . Proteolytic activation is there- fore essential for viral infectivity and dissemination 23 , and the HA glycoprotein has a key role in influenza virus pathogenicity 24 . The HAs of LPAI viruses possess a single arginine at the cleavage site uniF6AEFIGS 3,4) and are usually cleaved in only a limited number of organs, resulting in mild or asymptomatic infection. Proteases capable of cleaving the HAs of LPAI and HPAI viruses are often called ?trypsin-like? enzymes, and in vitro include blood-clotting factor Xa, tryptases, mini-plasmin and bacterial proteases 25?27 , although the enzymes respon- sible for HA cleavage in vivo are still unidentified. By contrast, the HAs of HPAI viruses possess a series of basic amino acids at the cleavage site, which are cleaved by ubiquitous proteases, such as furin and PC6 (proprotein convertase 6), which are present in a broad range of different host cells, supporting lethal systemic infection in poultry 28,29 . A carbo hydrate side chain near the cleavage site can affect HA cleav- ability by interfering with the accessibility of the host proteases to the cleavage site 30,31 . Therefore, HA cleav- ability is considered the main determinant of the tissue tropism of avian influenza viruses 32 , and differences in the tissue distribution of proteases and HA suscepti- bility to these enzymes can determine the outcome of virus infection. The acquisition of enhanced HA cleavability is an essential event in the conversion of avirulent avian influenza viruses to virulent strains, as was found in Pennsylvania (H5N2) in 1983 uniF6AEREF. 30uniF6AF, in Mexico (H5N2) in 1994 uniF6AEREFS 33,34uniF6AF, in Italy (H7N1) in 1997 uniF6AEREF. 35uniF6AF, in Chile (H7N3) in 2002 uniF6AEREF. 36uniF6AF and in Canada (H7N3) in 2004 uniF6AEREF. 37uniF6AF. Sequence conversion could be caused by poly merase slippage or non-homologous recombination between the gene that encodes HA and other genes at the cleavage site. Direct transmission to humans In general, as avian influenza viruses do not repli- cate efficiently in humans, direct transmission of avian viruses to humans is probably an extremely rare event, and high doses of avian virus are required to produce a quantifiable level of replica- tion in human volunteers 38 . The restricted growth of avian influenza viruses in humans was thought to be a barrier to the emergence of new pandemic strains by direct avian-to-human transmission. However, this perception changed in 1997, when an H5N1 avian virus was transmitted directly to humans from birds. Figure 2 | Past and potential future pandemic influenza viruses. Evidence indicates that the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic was caused by an H1N1 avian influenza virus that was transmitted to humans. A reassortant H1N1 virus possessing three avian gene segments (PB1, haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase) caused the 1957 pandemic (Asian influenza; H2N2 subtype). The H1N1 virus subsequently disappeared from human circulation. In 1968, another reassortant, carrying the genes that encode PB1 and HA from an H3 avian virus and the remaining gene segments from an H2N2 human virus, emerged as a new pandemic strain (Hong Kong influenza; H3N2 subtype); the H2N2 virus then disappeared from circulation. In 1977, an H1N1 virus that was genetically almost identical to the H1N1 virus from the 1950s spread rapidly among immunologically naive younger people (Russian influenza). The H1N1 and H3N2 viruses that have evolved from the strains responsible for the Russian and Hong Kong influenzas, respectively, continue to circulate in humans and produce annual epidemics. Since 1997, purely avian influenza viruses, including H5N1, H7N7 and H9N2 subtypes, have been directly transmitted to humans, raising concern over the possibility of a new influenza pandemic equal in impact to, or greater than, the Spanish influenza. NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 3 | AUGUST 2005 | 593 REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group Cleavage site Avian isolates Avirulent strain (H5) P Q ? ? ? ? R E T R G Avirulent strain (H7) P E X P ? ? ? K X R G Virulent strain (H5) P Q ? ? R K R K K R G Virulent strain (H7) P E P S K K R K K R G Human isolates: pandemic strains 1918 Spanish flu (H1N1) P S ? ? ? ? I Q S R G 1957 Asian flu (H2N2) P Q ? ? ? ? I E S R G 1968 Hong Kong flu (H3N2) P E ? ? ? ? K Q T R G 1977 Russian flu (H1N1) P S ? ? ? ? I Q S R G Human isolates: avian strains from humans 1997 Hong Kong (H5N1) P Q R E R R R K K R G 1999 Hong Kong (H9N2) P Q ? ? ? ? R S S R G 2003 the Netherlands (H7N7) P E I P ? K R R R R G 2004 Asian (H5N1) P Q R E(R)R R K K R G REYE SYNDROME A rare syndrome characterized by encephalopathy and fatty degeneration of the liver, occuring primarily in children upon a viral infection, including influenza. Although this syndrome has been epidemiologically associated with the use of aspirin and other salicylates, the exact pathogenesis of the disease remains unknown. ANTIGENIC DRIFT Change in the antigenicity of the haemagglutinin and neuraminidase owing to point mutations. ANTIBODY SEROCONVERSION The presence in serum of antibodies specific for antigens as a result of an infection. H5N1 virus. In May 1997, an H5N1 virus (A/Hong Kong/156/97) was isolated from a 3-year-old boy in Hong Kong 39?41 , who later died of extensive influenza pneumonia complicated by REYE SYNDROME. By the end of 1997, a total of 18 people had been infected by this virus, six of whom died. The clinical features of infection included onset of fever and upper-respi- ratory-tract infection, typical of classical influenza. Some patients had severe complications, mainly pneumonia, gastrointestinal manifestations, elevated liver enzymes and renal failure 42 . In general, children fared better than adults. Epidemiological studies suggested direct transmission of the virus from birds and serological evidence of human-to-human trans- mission was limited to a few cases 43 , indicating that the virus had not become fully adapted to its human host. The slaughter of all poultry in Hong Kong suc- cessfully eradicated the threat of a major outbreak of H5N1 virus infection. The human H5N1 isolates were not reassortants like the 1957 and 1968 pandemic strains; instead, all of the viral genes originated from a Eurasian avian virus 40,41 . The gene that encodes HA was derived from a H5N1 virus first isolated from a goose that died in Guangdong Province, China (A/goose/Guangdong/1/96) 44 . From 1997 through 2001, H5N1 viruses with an HA of the same genetic lineage continued to circulate in birds in southeastern China 45?47 . In 2002, another H5N1 virus showing ANTIGENIC DRIFT emerged in Hong Kong and was highly pathogenic in ducks and other aquatic birds, a property rarely associated with HPAI viruses 48 . In early 2003, an H5N1 virus infected a family in Hong Kong 49 ? the father and son (from whom the H5N1 virus was isolated) developed severe respiratory illness and the father died. The daughter also died of a respiratory infection of undiagnosed origin. The most devastating outbreak of influenza associ- ated with H5N1 HPAI viruses occurred in 2003?2004 in Asian countries, including Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, Laos, Korea, Japan and China (and later Malaysia) 50 . Although not officially reported, such viruses first appeared in July 2003 in poultry in Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. Extensive phylo- genetic analysis of the viruses isolated from poultry in Hong Kong and mainland China revealed multiple genetic reassortants representing multiple genotypes (proposed definition: genotypes A, B, C, D, E, V, W, X 0?3 , Y, Z and Z + ), although each of the reassortant viruses possessed an HA similar to that of the HA from the A/goose/Guangdong/1/96 strain 51 . Similarly, nine different genotypes were identified in domestic- duck isolates in mainland China (proposed definition: A?I), which were not related to the genotypes that were described for poultry isolates 52 . The H5N1 viruses with a dominant Z genotype were responsible for the outbreaks in Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia 51,53 , and had been detected in wild, migrating aquatic birds in Hong Kong in November 2002. Although the 2003 human isolate in Hong Kong showed genetic similarity to this aquatic-bird virus, it lacked a deletion in the NA ?stalk? region that is found in Z genotype viruses and was therefore given a Z + geno- type 51 . By contrast, viruses isolated in 2004 in Japan, where one human case of H5 ANTIBODY SEROCONVERSION was confirmed 54 , and in Korea belonged to genotype V. Their polymerase acid protein (PA) gene segments differed considerably from those of the genotype Z virus, although the remaining segments are related to this virus 55,56 . Therefore, at least two H5N1 geno- types, Z and V, seem to be responsible for the Asian outbreak in 2003?2004. Whether changes in the gene that encodes PA alone account for the different capaci- ties of these viruses to infect humans and cause severe disease is unknown. Taken together, these observations indicate that domestic ducks and land-based poultry in southern China probably had a central role in the generation and maintenance of the H5N1 virus and that wild birds might have contributed to the broad spread of the virus. Although outbreaks of HPAI viruses were confined to poultry (mainly chickens) in most countries, there was substantial transmission to humans, resulting in a total of 53 deaths in three countries: 37 of 76 infected persons in Vietnam, 12 of 17 infected persons in Thailand and all of four infected persons in Cambodia. The clinical presentations of fever, cough, diarrhoea, shortness of breath, rapid respiratory rate, lympho- paenia and abnormalities on chest radiography were similar to those noted during the 1997 H5N1 outbreak in Hong Kong, although diarrhoea was a more promi- nent feature in the Vietnamese patients 57 . The mortality rate in this outbreak was significantly higher than in the 1997 outbreak (54.6% versus 33.3%, calculated within the numbers of hospitalized cases reported officially), although both rates are undoubtedly over estimated owing to a lack of reliable denominators. Unlike the 1997 isolates, the Vietnamese human isolates were Figure 3 | HA cleavage site sequence of influenza A viruses. Basic amino acids are shown in blue boxes. Dashes are for the purpose of alignment only. 594 | AUGUST 2005 | VOLUME 3 www.nature.com/reviews/micro REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group LPAI Proteases localized in respiratory and intestinal organs Ubiquitous proteases HPAI HA0 HA0 HA1 HA2 RETR HA1 HA2 RERRRKKR PANZOOTIC Global prevalence of an infection in non-human animal hosts. resistant to the anti-influenza drugs amantadine and rimantadine (an amantadine derivative). There was no compelling evidence of human-to-human transmission in the more recent outbreak, with the exception of a few cases in Vietnamese 57 and Thai 58 families. Information on the pathological features of human infection associated with avian H5N1 viruses is limited. The results of postmortem examination, reported for only two fatal cases of infection with the 1997 virus, showed reactive haemophagocytic syn- drome as the most prominent feature, which involves diffuse alveolar damage with interstitial fibrosis, extensive necrosis of the hepatic central lobe, acute renal tubular necrosis and lymphoid depletion 59 . Elevated levels of cytokines such as interleukin-6 and interferon-? (IFN-?) were also detected, indicating that initial virus replication in the respiratory tract might trigger hypercytokinaemia, leading to reac- tive haemophagocytic syndrome. Similarly, patients infected with the 2003 H5N1 virus had unusually high serum concentrations of chemokines, such as IFN-inducing protein-10 and monokines induced by IFN-? 49 . Therefore, cytokine dysregulation might contribute to the pathogenesis of H5N1 disease in humans. A similar cytokine/chemokine disorder has been detected in mice infected with viruses that express the HA from the 1918 influenza virus 11,13 . Interestingly, H5N1 viruses isolated from appar- ently healthy domestic ducks in southern China became progressively more pathogenic in mice after 2000 uniF6AEREF. 52uniF6AF. Also, domestic cats and tigers died after eating poultry infected with H5N1 viruses 60 , and the susceptibility of cats to H5N1 uniF6AEREF. 61uniF6AF and H7N7 uniF6AEREF. 62uniF6AF viruses has been demonstrated by experimen- tal infection. Therefore, cats might serve as a biological vector, facilitating the transmission of H5N1 viruses to humans. H9N2 virus. In 1999, one of two antigenically different H9N2 influenza viruses (A/quail/Hong Kong/G1/ 97-like and A/duck/Hong Kong/Y280/97-like) was transmitted from birds to two persons in Hong Kong, causing mild respiratory disease. In mainland China, five human cases of H9N2 virus infection were con- firmed 63,64 . The G1-like virus, isolated from a human case in Hong Kong, is thought to have been involved in the generation of the HPAI H5N1 virus in 1997, as the two viruses share the same evolutionary origin of their six internal gene segments 65 . The H9N2 viruses were also detected in pigs in Hong Kong and are now PANZOOTIC in poultry in Eurasia 66 . In December 2003, an H9N2 (Y280-like) virus again infected humans in Hong Kong, causing mild respiratory disease in a child 67 . Therefore, in addition to H5N1 viruses, H9N2 viruses also pose a pandemic threat to humans, with their capacity to be transmitted to, and cause disease in, immunologically naive humans. H7 viruses. Previously, several self-limiting human infections with H7 viruses have been documented 68?70 . In 1996, an H7N7 avian influenza virus was isolated from a woman with conjunctivitis in England 71 . The source of the virus was considered to be waterfowl, as the woman tended a collection of ducks that mixed freely with feral waterfowl on a small lake. The entire HA gene of this human isolate showed close homology with an H7N7 virus isolate from a turkey in Ireland in 1995 uniF6AEREF. 72uniF6AF. Between February and May 2003, an HPAI H7N7 virus infected poultry in the Netherlands and was then transmitted to at least 89 people, 83 of whom presented with conjunctivitis. Cases of influenza-like illness were limited and mild 73,74 , although there was one fatal case of pneumonia in combination with acute respiratory distress syndrome 75 . Human-to-human transmission of the H7N7 virus was documented in three cases, in which the virus was acquired from a family member with conjunctivitis. Antibodies were also detected in 59% of the household contacts of infected poultry workers. Approximately 50% of the 500 persons examined who had contact with infected poultry during the epidemic had antibodies against the virus. It is estimated that at least 1,000 individuals were infected with the H7N7 virus during this epidemic in the Netherlands 76 . In 2004, an HPAI H7N3 virus emerged in poultry in British Columbia, Canada, and was apparently trans- mitted to two persons, whose clinical signs included conjunctivitis and mild respiratory symptoms 77 . The molecular basis for the ability of H7, but not H5, viruses to cause conjunctivitis in humans is unknown. Figure 4 | Haemagglutinin (HA) as a major determinant of the pathogenicity of avian influenza viruses in poultry. Post-translational proteolytic cleavage of the HA precursor molecule (HA0) into HA1 and HA2 subunits by host proteases generates a fusogenic domain at the amino terminus of HA2 (shown in grey), which mediates fusion between the viral envelope and the endosomal membrane. Therefore, proteolytic activation of the HA molecule is essential for viral infectivity. The HAs of low-pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) viruses do not contain a series of basic amino acid (RETR) at the protease cleavage site and are cleaved by proteases that are localized in respiratory and intestinal organs, resulting in mild localized infections. By contrast, the HAs of high-pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) viruses possess multiple basic amino acids at the cleavage site (RERRRKKR), which are cleaved by ubiquitous proteases in a wide range of organs, resulting in lethal systemic infection. NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 3 | AUGUST 2005 | 595 REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group Endocytosis Endosome HA trimer Membrane fusion and pore formation Molecular determinants of human infection It should be stressed that multiple genetic factors contribute to the efficient growth and pathogenicity of influenza viruses in any host. Nonetheless, key deter- minants have been elucidated and others are beginning to emerge. HA. As already mentioned, the HA glycoprotein is involved in host-cell recognition and is therefore an important determinant of host range. Human viruses preferentially recognize host-cell receptors contain- ing sialyloligosaccharides terminated by N-acetyl sialic acid linked to galactose with an ?2,6 linkage (NeuAc?2,6Gal), whereas avian viruses preferentially recognize host-cell receptors containing N-acetyl sialic acid linked to galactose by an ?2,3 linkage (NeuAc?2,3Gal) 78?81 . The epithelial cells in the human trachea contain mainly NeuAc?2,6Gal uniF6AEREF. 82uniF6AF, whereas those in duck trachea and intestine contain mainly NeuAc?2,3Gal linkages 80 (FIG. 5). In the pig trachea, epithelial cells contain both NeuAc?2,6Gal and NeuAc?2,3Gal linkages 83 , explaining why pigs are highly susceptible to both human and avian viruses and are thought by some to be a ?mixing vessel? for avian and human viruses, reassortment of which might give rise to pandemic strains. However, there is no evidence that the 1957 Asian and 1968 Hong Kong pandemic viruses were generated in pigs. The crucial residues determining ?2,3 or ?2,6 specificity differ among HA subtypes. For example, for the H3 HA, Leu226 found in human virus HAs, instead of Gln226 found in avian viruses, confers ?2,6 specificity 79 , whereas for the H1 HA, Asp190 found in swine and human viruses, but not Glu190 found in avian viruses, is responsible for this specificity, as pre- dicted by sequence comparison 84 and crystallographic analysis of the 1918 virus HA 9,10 , and confirmed by a direct receptor specificity assay 11 . The index 1997 human-isolated H5N1 virus prefer- entially recognized the avian receptor, NeuAc?2,3Gal uniF6AEREF. 85uniF6AF. Recently, ?2,3-linked sialic acids were iden- tified on ciliated cells in differentiated cultures of human tracheobronchial epithelium, and avian, but not human, viruses infected these cells 86 . So, there are cells in the human airway that are susceptible to avian viruses. The prevalence of cells possessing ?2,3 and/or ?2,6-linked sialic acids in the lower respiratory tract, including epithelial cells in bronchiole and alveolar cells, is still unknown. Also, it is highly probable that the receptor specificity of the H5N1 virus could be converted to a human type during repeated replica- tion in humans or pigs 87 . The earliest isolates from the 1918, 1957 and 1968 pandemics preferentially recog- nized NeuAc?2,6Gal uniF6AEREF. 84uniF6AF, even though their HAs were derived from an avian virus. This indicates that conversion of receptor specificity to NeuAc?2,6Gal is an alteration that might be necessary for the generation of a virus with pandemic potential. An intriguing concept that might account for the emergence of some pandemic viruses was recently pro- posed. It states that the receptor specificity of viruses circulating in land-based poultry differs from that of viruses circulating in aquatic birds 85,88 . In support of this hypothesis, H5N1 viruses isolated from chickens had a substantially lower affinity for NeuAc?2,3Gal than did aquatic bird viruses 85 , and this reduced affinity was similar to that of human influenza viruses, although the H5N1 chicken isolates did not show NeuAc?2,6Gal specificity. Moreover, the H5N1 chicken isolates with reduced receptor-binding affinity had acquired an additional glycosylation site in the globular head region of the HA, as well as a deletion in the NA stalk region ? molecular features found in the glycoproteins of human viruses 85 . Strikingly, H9N2 viruses isolated Figure 5 | Schematic representation of mechanism of action of influenza A haemagglutinin (HA). HA mediates virus binding to sialic-acid-containing host-cell receptors. Following binding, the virus is internalized by endocytosis. Acidification of the endosome environment induces conformational changes in the HA trimer, mediating fusion between the viral envelope and the endosomal membrane, which allows delivery of the viral ribonucleoprotein into host cells. Image modified with permission from REF. 81 � (2000) Annual Reviews. 596 | AUGUST 2005 | VOLUME 3 www.nature.com/reviews/micro REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group FLUMIST A live attenuated influenza vaccine based on cold-adapted viruses. from land-based poultry, but not from aquatic birds, showed a receptor specificity that was similar to that of human isolates 88,89 . These findings indicate that avian viruses in land-based poultry might pose a greater infectious threat to humans than the same viruses in aquatic birds. Enhanced HA cleavability owing to the presence of multiple basic amino acids at the cleavage site is essential for the high pathogenicity of avian viruses in poultry. All of the avian viruses that have killed humans possessed a highly cleavable HA 40,41,73 , indicat- ing that this requirement also extends to pathogenicity in humans. Indeed, the virulence of an H5N1 mutant virus in which the HA cleavage-site sequence was changed to an avirulent type was attenuated in a mouse model 90 . The H9N2 viruses isolated from humans in 1999 displayed a human-receptor specificity 88,89 , but did not cause fatal infections, probably because they lacked a highly cleavable HA. The evidence reported to date indicates that HPAI viruses, of either the H5 or H7 subtype, have the potential to cause devastating pandemics in the future. PB2. The 1997 H5N1 isolates from humans in Hong Kong formed two groups based on their pathogenicity in mice, which generally corresponded to the severity of disease in humans 91,92 . A reverse genetics study revealed that the amino acid at position 627 of PB2, a subunit protein of the viral RNA polymerase, determines the efficiency of virus replication in mice: Lys627, instead of the Glu627 that is found in avian viruses, is cru- cial for high virulence 90 . However, this amino acid does not determine the cell tropism of the virus 93 , but instead enhances viral growth in mice and probably in humans. This finding is supported by earlier studies of a single-gene reassortant virus (containing the PB2 gene from an avian virus and all other gene segments from a human virus) that displayed a restricted host- range phenotype characterized by efficient replication in avian, but not mammalian, cells 94 . In this virus, resi- due 627 in the PB2 protein was shown to be responsible for host-cell restriction (Glu627 in avian and Lys627 in human viruses) 95 . Interestingly, the 2003 H7N7 virus isolated from the fatal human case of pneumonia in the Netherlands also possessed Lys627 in PB2, in contrast to avian viruses isolated during the outbreak and other human isolates from non-fatal cases of conjunctivitis 73 . Similarly, many, but not all, of the 2004 H5N1 viruses isolated from humans in Vietnam harboured Lys627 in PB2. These findings implicate Lys627 in PB2 as an important determinant of virus replicative ability and host-cell tropism in humans. NS1. Unlike most human, avian and swine viruses, the 1997 H5N1 viruses are resistant to the antiviral effects of IFNs and tumour-necrosis factor-? (TNF-?). Therefore, a recombinant human H1N1 virus that contains the non-structural (NS) gene segment from the 1997 H5N1 virus showed increased pathogenicity in pigs 96,97 . Indeed, previous studies had indicated that the NS1 gene functions as an antagonist of the host IFN defence system in multiple ways 98?100 . The idea of a crucial role for the NS1 gene segment of the 1997 H5N1 virus in determining pathogenicity in humans is supported by Box 1 | Options for pandemic control Antivirals Amantadine inhibits virus uncoating by interfering with the activity of the M2 ion-channel protein 107 . However, a single mutation in human and avian influenza viruses can confer resistance to amantadine 108 . Moreover, the 2004 H5N1 Vietnam and Thailand isolates were resistant to amantadine because of mutations in the M2 gene segment 51 . Therefore, the potential of amantadine and amantadine derivatives for controlling pandemics might be limited. By contrast, anti-influenza neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, such as oseltamivir, which interfere with virus release from cells 109,110 , efficiently blocked the NA activity of 2004 H5N1 viruses in in vitro assays 55 , indicating that they would be effective for chemotherapy and prophylaxis against H5N1 virus infection. Although resistance to these compounds emerges less frequently than resistance to amantadine, resistant viruses have been identified in vitro 111 and in vivo 112 , emphasizing the need for careful monitoring whenever NA inhibitors are used to control pandemic influenza. Vaccines Although vaccination is one of the most effective means to control influenza, the pathogenicity of the H5N1 viruses creates many problems and safety concerns for vaccine manufacture. New vaccines are being developed, based on reverse genetics technology 113?115 and the knowledge that high-pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) viruses carry multiple basic amino acids at the haemagglutinin (HA) cleavage site, whereas low-pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) viruses lack such sequences 31 uniF6AETABLE 1uniF6AF. Conversion of the HA cleavage site sequence of HPAI viruses to that of LPAI viruses attenuates viral virulence but does not affect antigenicity 32 . Using this rationale, several research groups have produced candidate H5N1 vaccine strains whose HA and NA are derived from a human H5N1 virus, with the remainder of the genes coming from a virus that grows well in eggs 116?118 . Clinical trials with one of these strains 119,120 will be carried out in several different countries in the near future. One of the main concerns with this vaccine is that it might not induce sufficient protective immunity, as exemplified by recent experience with alternative H5 uniF6AEREFS 121,122uniF6AF or H9 uniF6AEREFS 123,124uniF6AF vaccines. Therefore, an adjuvant or an alternative immunization route (for example, nasal inoculation) might be required. A live H5N1 vaccine based on a recently licensed product, FLUMIST (MedImmune Vaccines, Inc.), is also an option 125 ; however, it could not be used until the H5N1 virus has become widespread among humans, unless the vaccine strain could be genetically modified to ensure that it does not reassort with human field strains. NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 3 | AUGUST 2005 | 597 REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group NA INHIBITORS Compounds, produced based on the three-dimensional structure of the neuraminidase (NA), that inhibit NA sialidase activity, preventing efficient viral release from cells. another report, which shows that a recombinant virus containing the NS gene from the 1918 Spanish influenza virus blocked the expression of IFN-regulated genes in human lung cells more efficiently than a wild-type virus 101 . So, counteracting the host?s innate immunity at an early phase of infection seems to be an important step for the efficient replication of avian viruses in human cells. Interestingly, infection with viruses containing the NS gene from the 1997 Hong Kong H5N1 virus led to increased transcription of proinflammatory cytokine genes (such as TNF-? and IFN-?) in human primary monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro compared with infection with other types of viruses 102 . Such an upregu- lation of cytokine function at later phases of infection might explain the unusual clinical presentation and severity of disease associated with human H5N1 infec- tion. Overall, these results indicate that an NS1-induced cytokine imbalance, similar to the hypercytokinaemia associated with the 1997 and 2003 H5N1 viruses, prob- ably contributes to the extreme pathogenicity of avian viruses in humans. Other gene products. The 1997 H5N1 chicken and human viruses contained a 19-amino-acid deletion in the NA stalk region that probably decreased NA enzy- matic activity 85 . Whether this deletion is involved in the pathogenicity of the H5N1 viruses in humans is unclear, although a similar change is probably required for the adaptation of influenza viruses from wild aquatic birds to chickens and has been recognized in HPAI viruses 103 . The genes encoding the internal proteins of viruses other than PB2 also probably influence host specifi- city 104,105 . For example, replacement of the PB1 gene of a human virus with that of an avian virus resulted in attenuation of viral replicative ability in cells of mam- malian origin (MDCK cells) and in squirrel monkeys, but not in chicken kidney cells 106 . However, these find- ings can be interpreted either as incompatibility among viral gene products or solely as a contribution of these gene products to host range restriction. Together with the lack of appropriate animal models, this type of ambi- guity in interpreting experimental results poses consid- erable difficulties in determining the factors responsible for the restriction of avian viruses in humans. Emergence of pandemic strains Historically, influenza pandemics have been caused by viruses possessing avian-virus-derived HAs to which human populations lack immunity; this mechanism of emergence will probably continue. Whether these viruses are introduced directly or indirectly into human populations is uncertain. Pandemics in the previous century were caused by the introduction of a wholly avian virus or an avian?human reassortant 14 . Phylogenetic and virological studies of isolates from these global outbreaks suggest the following two possi- bilities. Firstly, transmission of viruses from land-based poultry. In this scenario, viruses from quails, chickens or other types of land-based poultry, for which the receptor specificity has been altered during adapta- tion in these birds towards that of a human virus 85,88 , directly infect humans and undergo further adapta- tion, with mutations in genes that encode both surface and internal proteins, or reassort with a human virus, acquiring genes that encode internal proteins required for efficient viral replication. Second, involvement of pigs. In this scenario, avian viruses are transmitted to pigs, where they adapt for efficient growth in humans by acquiring mutations in the HA that are necessary to recognize ?2,6-linked sialic acids 84 and possibly also in the genes encoding internal proteins. Alternatively, both avian and human viruses are transmitted to pigs, where they reassort, and the resultant reassortant viruses can be transmitted to humans: the classic ?pigs-as-mixing vessels? concept. Regardless of the scenario, further adaptive muta- tions in the gene segments that encode both surface and internal proteins are probably introduced after the viruses enter human populations. Therefore, viruses can infect humans and trigger pandemics even when they are not optimally adapted for growth in the human host, while continued replication in humans allows the viruses to ?fine tune? their replicative machinery. In addition, accidental release of a virus that was previously circulating in, but had since disappeared from, human populations might also lead to a pandemic. In fact, this was probably the case for the outbreak of Russian influenza in 1977. Concluding remarks The recent influenza outbreaks in Asia provide a warning that any type A influenza virus has the poten- tial to trigger a pandemic and that avian viruses do not need to reassort with a human virus first, nor do they require an intermediate mammalian host. Although Spanish influenza exacted a frightening toll of victims in 1918?1919, its mortality rate seems to have been lower than the rates reported for the recent H5N1 human influenza in Hong Kong, Vietnam and Thailand. Whether H5N1 viruses will acquire the ability to spread rapidly through human populations is uncertain. Past pandemics indicate that a change in host-cell-receptor specificity, and possibly in other properties of the viral gene products, is required for efficient human-to-human transmission of the virus. If this occurs, and if the virus continues to have such a high mortality rate, the resultant pandemic will have a devastating global impact. Additionally, it is uncertain whether H5N1 viruses will emerge that are resistant to anti-influenza drugs, especially the NA INHIBITORS. Nonetheless, a lack of other options has led to efforts to stockpile these drugs, while work to produce an effective vaccine is underway uniF6AEBOX 1uniF6AF. Alternatively, one could efficiently prevent a pan- demic outbreak by stopping the transmission of H5N1 viruses from poultry to humans. Although national and regional governments have been collaborating on strategies to achieve this goal, the results remain inad- equate. The investment of time and money needed to control H5N1 viruses in poultry might seem excessive, but could easily be justified in terms of the number of human lives spared. 598 | AUGUST 2005 | VOLUME 3 www.nature.com/reviews/micro REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group 1. Lamb, R. A. & Krug, R. M. In Fields Virology 4th edn (eds Fields, B. N., Knipe, D. M. & Howley, P. M.) Ch. 46 (Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 2001). 2. Wright, P. F. & Webster, R. G. In Fields Virology 4th edn (eds Fields, B. N., Knipe, D. M. & Howley, P. M.) Ch. 47 (Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 2001). 3. Fouchier, R. A. et al. Characterization of a novel influenza A virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black- headed gulls. J. Virol. 79, 2814?2822 (2005). 4. Webster, R. G., Bean, W. J., Gorman, O. T., Chambers, T. M. & Kawaoka, Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol. Rev. 56, 152?179 (1992). 5. Johnson, N. P. & Mueller, J. Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918?1920 ?Spanish? influenza pandemic. Bull. Hist. Med. 76, 105?115 (2002). 6. Reid, A. H. & Taubenberger, J. K. The origin of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus: a continuing enigma. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 2285?2292 (2003). 7. Simonsen, L. et al. Pandemic versus epidemic influenza mortality: a pattern of changing age distribution. J. Infect. Dis. 178, 53?60 (1998). 8. Reid, A. H, Taubenberger, J. K. & Fanning, T. G. Evidence of an absence: the genetic origins of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 909?914 (2004). 9. Gamblin, S. J. et al. The structure and receptor binding properties of the 1918 influenza hemagglutinin. Science 303, 1838?1842 (2004). 10. Stevens, J. et al. Structure of the uncleaved human H1 hemagglutinin from the extinct 1918 influenza virus. Science 303, 1866?1870 (2004). References 9 and 10 suggest a preferential binding of the HA of the Spanish influenza virus to human cell receptors based on its three-dimensional structure. 11. Kobasa, D. et al. Enhanced virulence of influenza A viruses with the haemagglutinin of the 1918 pandemic virus. Nature 431, 703?707 (2004). Describes, in a mouse model, the crucial role of the HA of the Spanish influenza virus that plays a part in the extreme pathogenicity of this virus through a mechanism involving cytokine dysfunction. 12. Tumpey, T. M. et al. Pathogenicity and immunogenicity of influenza viruses with genes from the 1918 pandemic virus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3166?3171 (2004). 13. Kash, J. C. et al. Global host immune response: pathogenesis and transcriptional profiling of type A influenza viruses expressing the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes from the 1918 pandemic virus. J. Virol. 78, 9499?9511 (2004). 14. Cox, N. J. & Subbarao, K. Global epidemiology of influenza: past and present. Annu. Rev. Med. 51, 407?421 (2000). 15. Scholtissek, C., Rohde, W., Von Hoyningen, V. & Rott, R. On the origin of the human influenza virus subtype H2N2 and H3N2. Virology 87, 13?20 (1978). 16. Kawaoka, T., Krauss, S. & Webster, R. G. Avian-to-human transmission of the PB1 gene of influenza A virus. J. Virol. 63, 4603?4608 (1989). 17. Zhou, N. N. et al. Genetic reassortment of avian, swine, and human influenza A viruses in American pigs. J. Virol. 73, 8851?8856 (1999). 18. Nakajima, K., Desselberger, U. & Palese, P. Recent human influenza A (H1N1) viruses are closely related genetically to strains isolated in 1950. Nature 274, 334?339 (1978). 19. Alexander, D. J., Parsons, G. & Manvell, R. J. Experimental assessment of the pathogenicity of eight avian influenza A viruses of H5 subtype for chickens, turkeys, ducks and quail. Avian Pathol. 15, 647?662 (1986). 20. Mo, I. P., Brugh, M., Fletcher, O. J., Rowland, G. N. & Swayne, D. E. Comparative pathology of chickens experimentally inoculated with avian influenza viruses of low and high pathogenicity. Avian Dis. 41, 125?136 (1997). 21. Kobayashi, Y., Horimoto, T., Kawaoka, Y., Alexander, D. J. & Itakura, C. Pathological studies of chickens experimentally infected with two highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Avian Pathol. 25, 285?304 (1996). 22. White, J., Kartenbeck, J. & Helenius, A. Membrane fusion activity of influenza virus. EMBO J. 1, 217?222 (1982). 23. Klenk, H.-D., Rott, R., Orlich, M. & Blodorn, J. Activation of influenza A viruses by trypsin treatment. Virology 68, 426? 439 (1975). 24. Webster, R. G. & Rott, R. Influenza virus A pathogenicity: the pivotal role of hemagglutinin. Cell 50, 665?666 (1987). 25. Gotoh, B. et al. An endoprotease homologous to the blood clotting factor X as a determinant of viral tropism in chick embryo. EMBO J. 9, 4189?4195 (1990). 26. Kido, H. et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel trypsin-like protease found in rat bronchiolar epithelial Clara cells. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13573?13579 (1992). 27. Murakami, M. et al. Mini-plasmin found in the epithelial cells of bronchioles triggers infection by broad-spectrum influenza A viruses and Sendai virus. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 2847?2855 (2001). 28. Stieneke-Grober, A. et al. Influenza virus hemagglutinin with multibasic cleavage site is activated by furin, a subtilisin-like endoprotease. EMBO J. 11, 2407?2414 (1992). 29. Horimoto, T, Nakayama, K., Smeekens, S. P. & Kawaoka, Y. Proprotein-processing endoproteases PC6 and furin both activate hemagglutinin of virulent avain influenza viruses. J. Virol. 68, 6074?6078 (1994). 30. Kawaoka, Y., Naeve, C. W. & Webster, R. G. Is virulence of H5N2 influenza viruses in chicken associated with loss of carbohydrate from the hemagglutinin? Virology 139, 303? 316 (1984). 31. Kawaoka, Y. & Webster, R. G. Sequence requirements for cleavage activation of influenza virus hemagglutinin expressed in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 324?328 (1988). 32. Horimoto, T. & Kawaoka, Y. Reverse genetics provides direct evidence for a correlation of hemagglutinin cleavability and virulence of an avian influenza A virus. J. Virol. 68, 3120?3128 (1994). 33. Horimoto, T. et al. Origin and molecular changes associated with emergence of a highly pathogenic H5N2 influenza virus in Mexico. Virology 213, 223?230 (1995). 34. Garcia, M., Crawford, J. M., Latimer, J. W., Rivera-Cruz, E. & Perdue, M. L. Heterogeneity in the haemagglutinin gene and emergence of the highly pathogenic phenotype among recent H5N2 avian influenza viruses from Mexico. J. Gen. Virol. 77, 1493?1504 (1996). 35. Banks, J. et al. Changes in the haemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes prior to the emergence of highly pathogenic H7N1 avian influenza viruses in Italy. Arch. Virol. 146, 963?973 (2001). 36. Suarez, D. L. et al. Recombination resulting in virulence shift in avian influenza outbreak, Chile. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 693?699 (2004). 37. Hirst, M. et al. Novel avian influenza H7N3 strain outbreak, British Columbia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 2192?2195 (2004). 38. Beare, A. S. & Webster, R. G. Replication of avian influenza viruses in humans. Arch. Virol. 119, 37?42 (1991). 39. de Jong, J. C., Claas, E. C. J., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., Webster, R. G. & Lim, W. L. A pandemic warning. Nature 389, 554 (1997). 40. Subbarao, K. et al. Characterization of an avian influenza A (H5N1) virus isolated from a child with a fatal respiratory illness. Science 279, 393?396 (1998). 41. Claas, E. J. et al. Human influenza A H5N1 virus related to a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Lancet 351, 472?477 (1998). References 40 and 41 analysed the index case of H5N1 human infection in 1997 in Hong Kong, and revealed that a purely avian virus was transmitted to a human for the first time. 42. Yuen, K. Y. et al. Clinical features and rapid viral diagnosis of human disease associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus. Lancet 351, 467?471 (1998). 43. Buxton Bridges, C. et al. Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among health care workers exposed to patients with influenza A (H5N1), Hong Kong. J. Infect. Dis. 181, 344?348 (2000). 44. Xu, X., Subbarao, K., Cox, N. J. & Guo, Y. Genetic characterization of the pathogenic influenza A/Goose/ Guangdong/1/96 (H5N1) virus: similarity of its hemagglutinin gene to those of H5N1 viruses from the 1997 outbreaks in Hong Kong. Virology 261, 15?19 (1999). 45. Cauthen, A. N., Swayne, D. E., Schultz-Cherry, S., Perdue, M. L. & Suarez, D. L. Continued circulation in China of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses encoding the hemagglutinin gene associated with the 1997 H5N1 outbreak in poultry and humans. J. Virol. 74, 6592?6599 (2000). 46. Guan, Y. et al. Emergence of multiple genotypes of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Hong Kong SAR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8950?8955 (2002). 47. Guan, Y. et al. H5N1 influenza: A protean pandemic threat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8156?8161 (2004). 48. Sturm-Ramirez K. M. et al. Reemerging H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong in 2002 are highly pathogenic to ducks. J. Virol. 78, 4892?4901 (2004). 49. Peiris, J. S. et al. Re-emergence of fatal human influenza A subtype H5N1 disease. Lancet 363, 617?619 (2004). 50. World Health Organization. Avian influenza A (H5N1). Weekly Epidemiol. Rev. 79, 65?70 (2004). 51. Li, K. S. et al. Genesis of a highly pathogenic and potentially pandemic H5N1 influenza virus in eastern Asia. Nature 430, 209?213 (2004). Describes the phylogenetic relationships of the genes of Asian H5N1 viruses, showing a series of genetic reassortment events that are traceable to the precursor virus in 1997 and subsequent avian outbreaks in 2001 and 2002, which gave rise to a dominant genotype responsible for the outbreaks in 2003?2004. 52. Chen, H. et al. The evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in ducks in southern China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10452?10457 (2004). Describes that H5N1 viruses, isolated from healthy domestic ducks in China after 1999, became progressively more pathogenic in a mammalian model. 53. Viseshakul, N. et al. The genome sequence analysis of H5N1 avian influenza A virus isolated from the outbreak among poultry populations in Thailand. Virology 328, 169?176 (2004). 54. ProMED-mail. Avian influenza, humans ? Japan (Kyoto) (03) [online], <http://www.promedmail.org> (Archive Number 20041222. 3372, 22 Dec 2004). 55. Mase, M. et al. Characterization of H5N1 influenza A viruses isolated during the 2003?2004 influenza outbreaks in Japan. Virology 332, 167?176 (2005). 56. Lee, C. W. et al. Characterization of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza A viruses isolated from South Korea. J. Virol. 79, 3692?3702 (2005). References 55 and 56 describe, respectively, that the H5N1 viruses isolated in Japan and South Korea were genotypically and pathologically different from those prevalent in southeast Asia. 57. Tran, T. H. et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) in 10 patients in Vietnam. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1179?1188 (2004). 58. Ungchusak, K. et al. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1). N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 333?340 (2005). A report on probable human-to-human transmission of the H5N1 virus. 59. To, K. F. et al. Pathology of fatal human infection associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus. J. Med. Virol. 63, 242?246 (2001). 60. Enserink, M. & Kaiser, J. Avian flu finds new mammal hosts. Science 305, 1385 (2004). 61. Kuiken, T. et al. Avian H5N1 influenza in cats. Science 306, 241 (2004). 62. Nakamura, J. & Iwasa, T. On the fowl-pest infection in cat. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 4, 511?523 (1942). 63. Peiris, M. et al. Human infection with influenza H9N2. Lancet 354, 916?917 (1999). 64. Guo, Y. et al. Characterization of the pathogenicity of members of the newly established H9N2 influenza virus lineages in Asia. Virology 267, 279?288 (2000). 65. Lin, Y. P. et al. Avian-to-human transmission of H9N2 subtype influenza A viruses: relationship between H9N2 and H5N1 human isolates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9654?9658 (2000). 66. Choi, Y. K. et al. Continuing evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in southeastern China. J. Virol. 78, 8609?8614 (2004). 67. World Health Organization disease alert: 10 December 2003. Influenza A (H9N2) in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. [online], <http://www. who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/updates/en> (2003). 68. Campbell, C. H., Webster, R. G. & Breese, S. S. Jr. Fowl plague virus from man. J. Inf. Dis. 122, 513?516 (1970). 69. Taylor, H. R. & Turner, A. J. A case report of fowl plague keratoconjunctivitis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 61, 86?88 (1977). 70. Webster, R. G., Geraci, J., Petursson, G. & Skirnission, K. Conjunctivitis in human beings caused by influenza A virus of seals. N. Engl. J. Med. 304, 911 (1981). 71. Kurtz, J., Menvell, R. J. & Banks, J. Avian influenza virus isolated from a woman with conjunctivitis. Lancet 348, 901?902 (1996). 72. Banks, J., Speidel, E. & Alexander, D. J. Characterization of an avian influenza A virus isolated from a human ? is an intermediate host necessary for the emergence of pandemic influenza viruses? Arch. Virol. 143, 781?787 (1998). 73. Fouchier, R. A. M. et al. Avian influenza A virus (H7N7) associated with human conjunctivitis and a fatal case of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1356?1361 (2004). 74. Koopmans, M. et al. Transmission of H7N7 avian influenza A virus to human beings during a large outbreak in commercial poultry farms in the Netherlands. Lancet 363, 587?593 (2004). References 73 and 74 summarize human infections with a highly pathogenic avian H7N7 virus in the Netherlands in 2003. 75. van Kolfschooten, F. Dutch veterinarian becomes first victim of avian influenza. Lancet 361, 1444 (2003). 76. Bosman, A. et al. Avian flu epidemic 2003: public health consequences. RIVM Report 630940004 (2004). NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY VOLUME 3 | AUGUST 2005 | 599 REVIEWS � 2005 Nature Publishing Group 77. Tweed, S. A. et al. Human illness from avian influenza H7N3, British Columbia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 2196?2199 (2004). 78. Rogers, G. N. & D?Souza, B. L. Receptor binding properties of human and animal H1 influenza virus isolates. Virology 173, 317?322 (1989). 79. Connor, R. J., Kawaoka, Y., Webster, R. G. & Paulson, J. C. Receptor specificity in human, avian, and equine H2 and H3 influenza virus isolates. Virology 205, 17?23 (1994). 80. Ito, T. & Kawaoka, Y. Host-range barrier of influenza A viruses. Vet. Microbiol. 74, 71?75 (2000). 81. Skehel, J. J. & Wiley, D. C. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 531?569 (2000). 82. Couceiro, J. N. S. S., Paulson, J. C. & Baum, L. G. Influenza virus strains selectively recognize sialyloligosaccharides on human respiratory epithelium: the role of the host cell in selection of hemagglutinin receptor specificity. Virus Res. 29, 155?165 (1993). 83. Ito, T. et al. Molecular basis for the generation in pigs of influenza A viruses with pandemic potential. J. Virol. 72, 7367?7373 (1998). 84. Matrosovich, M. et al. Early alterations of the receptor- binding properties of H1, H2, and H3 avian influenza virus hemagglutinins after their introduction into mammals. J. Virol. 74, 8502?8512 (2000). 85. Matrosovich, M., Zhou, N., Kawaoka, Y. & Webster, R. G. The surface glycoproteins of H5 influenza viruses isolated from humans, chickens, and wild aquatic birds have distinguishable properties. J. Virol. 73, 1146?1155 (1999). 86. Matrosovich, M. N., Matrosovich, T. Y., Gray, T., Roberts, N. A. & Klenk, H-D. Human and avian influenza viruses target different cell types in cultures of human airway epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4620?4624 (2004). The first demonstration that human airway epithelium contains cells possessing avian-type receptors. 87. Harvey, R., Martin, A. C., Zambon, M. & Barclay, W. S. Restrictions to the adaptation of influenza A virus H5 hemagglutinin to the human host. J. Virol. 78, 502?507 (2004). 88. Matrosovich, M. N., Krauss, S. & Webster, R. G. H9N2 influenza A viruses from poultry in Asia have human virus- like receptor specificity. Virology 281, 156?162 (2001). 89. Saito, T. et al. Characterization of a human H9N2 influenza virus isolated in Hong Kong. Vaccine 20, 125?133 (2001). 90. Hatta, M., Gao, P., Halfmann, P. & Kawaoka, Y. Molecular basis for high virulence of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza A viruses. Science 293, 1840?1842 (2001). This paper describes that one amino acid in PB2, an RNA polymerase subunit, affects virulence of avian H5N1 virus in a mammalian model. 91. Gao, P. et al. Biological heterogeneity, including systemic replication in mice, of H5N1 influenza A virus isolates from humans in Hong Kong. J. Virol. 73, 3184?3189 (1999). 92. Lu, X. et al. A mouse model for the evaluation of pathogenesis and immunity to influenza A (H5N1) viruses isolated from humans. J. Virol. 73, 5903?5911 (1999). 93. Shinya, K. et al. PB2 amino acid at position 627 affects replicative efficiency, but not cell tropism, of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza A viruses in mice. Virology 320, 258?266 (2004). 94. Clements, M. L. et al. Use of single-gene reassortant viruses to study the role of avian influenza A virus genes in attenuation of wild-type human influenza A virus for squirrel monkeys and adult human volunteers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30, 655?662 (1992). 95. Subbarao, E. K., London, W. & Murphy, B. R. A single amino acid in the PB2 gene of influenza A virus is a determinant of host range. J. Virol. 67, 1761?1764 (1993). 96. Seo, S. H., Hoffmann, E. & Webster, R. G. Lethal H5N1 influenza viruses escape host anti-viral cytokine responses. Nature Med. 8, 950?954 (2002). 97. Seo, S. H., Hoffmann, E. & Webster, R. G. The NS1 gene of H5N1 influenza viruses circumvents the host anti-viral cytokine responses. Virus Res. 103, 107?113 (2004). References 96 and 97 indicate that one amino acid in NS1, an IFN antagonist, affects the virulence of an avian H5N1 virus in a mammalian model. 98. Garcia-Sastre, A. et al. Influenza A virus lacking the NS1 gene replicates in interferon-deficient systems. Virology 252, 324?330 (1998). 99. Garcia-Sastre, A. Inhibition of interferon-mediated antiviral responses by influenza A viruses and other negative- strand RNA viruses. Virology 279, 375?384 (2001). 100. Krug, R. M., Yuan, W., Noah, D. L. & Latham, A. G. Intracellular warfare between human influenza viruses and human cells: the roles of the viral NS1 protein. Virology 309, 181?189 (2003). 101. Geiss, G. K. et al. Cellular transcriptional profiling in influenza A virus-infected lung epithelial cells: the role of the nonstructural NS1 protein in the evasion of the host innate defense and its potential contribution to pandemic influenza. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10736?10741 (2002). 102. Cheung, C. Y. et al. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human macrophages by influenza A (H5N1) viruses: a mechanism for the unusual severity of human disease? Lancet 360, 1831?1837 (2003). 103. Deshpande, K. L., Naeve, C. W. & Webster, R. G. The neuraminidases of the virulent and avirulent A/Chicken/ Pennsylvania/83 (H5N2) influenza A viruses: sequence and antigenic analyses. Virology 147, 49?60 (1985). 104. Zhou, N. N., Shortridge, K. F., Claas, E. C. J., Krauss, S. L. & Webster, R. G. Rapid evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in chickens in Hong Kong. J. Virol. 73, 3366?3374 (1999). 105. Katz, J. M. et al. Molecular correlates of influenza A H5N1 virus pathogenesis in mice. J. Virol. 74, 10807?10810 (2000). 106. Snyder, M. H., Buckler-White, A. J., London, W. T., Tierney, E. L. & Murphy, B. R. The avian influenza virus nucleoprotein gene and a specific constellation of avian and human virus polymerase genes each specify attenuation of avian-human influenza A/Pintail/79 reassortant viruses from monkeys. J. Virol. 61, 2857?2863 (1987). 107. Wang, C., Takeuchi, K., Pinto, L. H. & Lamb, R. A. Ion channel activity of influenza A virus M2 protein: characterization of the amantadine block. J. Virol. 67, 5585?5594 (1993). 108. Crumpacker, C. In Fields Virology 4th edn (eds Fields, B. N., Knipe, D. M. & Howley, P. M.) Ch. 15 (Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 2001). 109. von Itzstein, M. et al. Rational design of potent sialidase- based inhibitors of influenza virus replication. Nature 363, 418?423 (1993). 110. Gubareva, L. V., Kaiser, L. & Hayden, F. G. Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors. Lancet 355, 827?835 (2000). 111. Gubareva, L. V. Molecular mechanisms of influenza virus resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors. Virus Res. 103, 199?203 (2004). 112. Kiso, M. et al. Resistant influenza A viruses in children treated with oseltamivir: descriptive study. Lancet 364, 759?765 (2004). 113. Neumann, G. et al. Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9345?9350 (1999). 114. Hoffmann, E., Neumann, G., Kawaoka, Y., Hobom, G., Webster, R. G. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6108?6113 (2000). 115. Fodor, E. et al. Rescue of influenza A virus from recombinant DNA. J. Virol. 73, 9679?9682 (1999). 116. Webby, R. J. et al. Responsiveness to a pandemic alert: use of reverse genetics for rapid development of influenza vaccines. Lancet 363, 1099?1103 (2004). 117. Wood, J. M. & Robertson, J. S. From lethal virus to life- saving vaccine: the development of inactivated influenza vaccines for pandemic influenza. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 842?847 (2004). An overview of development of H5N1 influenza vaccine using reverse genetics. 118. Subbarao, K. et al. Evaluation of a genetically modified reassortant H5N1 influenza A virus vaccine candidate generated by plasmid-based reverse genetics. Virology 305, 192?200 (2003). 119. WHO Global Influenza Programme. Production of pilot lots of inactivated influenza vaccines from reassortant derived from avian influenza viruses: interim biosafety risk assessment. [online], < http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/ influenza/en/influenzaRMD2003_5.pdf> (2003). 120. Stephenson, I, Nicholson, K. G., Wood, J. M., Zambon, M. C. & Katz, J. M. Confronting the avian influenza threat: vaccine development for a potential pandemic. Lancet Infect. Dis. 4, 499?509 (2004). 121. Nicholson, K. G. et al. Safety and antigenicity of non- adjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/ Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccine: a randomised trial of two potential vaccines against H5N1 influenza. Lancet 357, 1937?1943 (2001). 122. Treanor, J. J. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hemagglutinin vaccine for H5 influenza in humans. Vaccine 19, 1732?1737 (2001). 123. Hehme, N., Engelmann, H., Kunzel, W., Neumeier, E. & Sanger, R. Pandemic preparedness: lessons learnt from H2N2 and H9N2 candidate vaccines. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 191, 203?208 (2002). 124. Stephenson, I. et al. Safety and antigenicity of whole virus and subunit influenza A/Hong Kong/1073/99 (H9N2) vaccine in healthy adults: phase I randomised trial. Lancet 362, 1959?1966 (2003). 125. Li, S. Q. et al. Recombinant influenza A virus vaccines for the pathogenic human A/Hong Kong/97 (H5N1) viruses. J. Infect. Dis. 179, 1132?1138 (1999). Acknowledgements We thank J. Gilbert for editing the manuscript. We also thank those in our laboratories who contributed to the data cited in this review. Our original research was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Public Health Service research grants, by CREST (Japan Science and Technology Agency) and by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Competing interests statement The authors declare no competing interests. Online links DATABASES The following terms in this article are linked online to: Infectious Disease Information: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/ diseases/index.htm Influenza Protein Data Bank: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb HA | NA FURTHER INFORMATION Yoshihiro Kawaoka?s homepages: http://www.growingenius.com/firstpage.htm http://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/pbs/kawaoka WHO Influenza Information: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/ influenza/en WHO Avian Influenza Information: http://www.who.int/csr/ disease/avian_influenza/en Access to this interactive links box is free online. 600 | AUGUST 2005 | VOLUME 3 www.nature.com/reviews/micro REVIEWS "
Add Content to Group
|
Bookmark
|
Keywords
|
Flag Inappropriate
share
Close
Digg
Facebook
MySpace
Google+
Comments
Close
Please Post Your Comment
*
The Comment you have entered exceeds the maximum length.
Submit
|
Cancel
*
Required
Comments
Please Post Your Comment
No comments yet.
Save Note
Note
View
Public
Private
Friends & Groups
Friends
Groups
Save
|
Cancel
|
Delete
Please provide your notes.
Next
|
Prev
|
Close
|
Edit
|
Delete
Genetics
Gene Inheritance and Transmission
Gene Expression and Regulation
Nucleic Acid Structure and Function
Chromosomes and Cytogenetics
Evolutionary Genetics
Population and Quantitative Genetics
Genomics
Genes and Disease
Genetics and Society
Cell Biology
Cell Origins and Metabolism
Proteins and Gene Expression
Subcellular Compartments
Cell Communication
Cell Cycle and Cell Division
Scientific Communication
Career Planning
Loading ...
Scitable Chat
Register
|
Sign In
Visual Browse
Close
Comments
CloseComments
Please Post Your Comment