Abstract
Abnormal angiogenesis leads to tumor progression and metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to elucidate the association between angiogenesis-related genes, including VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, and ANGPT-2 with both metastatic and microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) subtypes of CRC. We conducted a thorough assessment of the ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A gene expression utilizing publicly available RNA sequencing and microarray datasets. Then, the experimental validation was performed in 122 CRC patients, considering their disease metastasis and EMAST+/− profile by using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Subsequently, a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network associated with these angiogenesis-related genes was constructed and analyzed. The expression level of VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 genes were significantly higher in tumor tissues as compared with normal adjacent tissues (P-value < 0.001). Nevertheless, ANGPT-1 had a significantly lower expression in tumor samples than in normal colon tissue (P-value < 0.01). We identified a significantly increased VEGF-A (P-value = 0.002) and decreased ANGPT-1 (P-value = 0.04) expression in EMAST+ colorectal tumors. Regarding metastasis, a significantly increased VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 expression (P-value = 0.001) and decreased ANGPT-1 expression (P-value < 0.05) were established in metastatic CRC patients. Remarkably, co-expression analysis also showed a strong correlation between ANGPT-2 and VEGF-A gene expressions. The ceRNA network was constructed by ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, VEGF-A, and experimentally validated miRNAs (hsa-miR-190a-3p, hsa-miR-374c-5p, hsa-miR-452-5p, and hsa-miR-889-3p), lncRNAs (AFAP1-AS1, KCNQ1OT1 and MALAT1), and TFs (Sp1, E2F1, and STAT3). Network analysis revealed that colorectal cancer is amongst the 82 significant pathways. We demonstrated a significant differential expression of VEGF-A and ANGPT-1 in colorectal cancer patients exhibiting the EMAST+ phenotype. This finding provides novel insights into the molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, specifically in EMAST subtypes. Yet, the generalization of in silico findings to EMAST+ colorectal cancer warrants future experimental investigations. In the end, this study proposes that the EMAST biomarker could serve as an additional perspective on CMS4 biology which is well-defined by activated angiogenesis and worse overall survival.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Angiogenesis is a naturally occurring and vital physiological process for the growth and development of normal tissue cells during embryonic development and later, which is regulated by a fine balance between a range of stimulatory factors promoting the growth of new blood vessels and inhibitory signals blocking the uncontrolled expansion of new blood vessels1,2. However, under certain circumstances, the effect of activators surpasses those of the inhibitors, and this phenomenon can lead to certain aggressive diseases, including tumor progression and metastasis3. In other words, angiogenesis plays a prominent role in tumor growth and proliferation and is approved to be a prerequisite for metastatic dissemination of colorectal tumors4,5.
Angiogenesis is assessed by multiple angiogenic factors, and among them, the most prominent tumor angiogenesis regulator is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3)6. VEGF is a signaling glycoprotein identified as a crucial stimulator of angiogenesis by which colon tumors’ growth is promoted via increased nutrient provision7. Moreover, the VEGF-induced signaling pathway is fundamental for tumor progression and participates significantly in the metastasis of colorectal cancer8. In this regard, a significant correlation between VEGF overexpression and poor prognosis has been outlined in CRC patients9. Besides VEGF, Angiopoietins (ANGPT-1 and ANGPT-2) and their receptor, Tie-2, are shown as other determining elements involved in the induction of angiogenesis4. Angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT-1) has been termed the chief ligand that induces activation of the Tie-2 receptor via phosphorylation and, therefore, promotes endothelial cell survival and contributes to vessel stabilization10. Furthermore, previous investigations seem to support the idea that unlike VEGF and ANGPT-2, the expression level of ANGPT-1 is significantly lower in colon cancer cells compared to normal colonic epithelium, and transfecting human colon carcinoma cell line with ANGPT-1 inhibited the tumor cell proliferation and growth11,12. Angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT-2) performs an antagonistic function towards ANGPT-1 by preventing the Tie-2 receptor’s activation, which results in vessels being structurally and functionally fragile and unstable11,13. This incident is an essential and inseparable step in the induction of abnormal angiogenesis in several malignancies, including CRC. Therefore, many studies have suggested that overexpression of angiogenesis-related genes, namely, VEGF and ANGPT-2, makes them useful prognostic biomarkers for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma9,10.
A growing body of research shows that there are other potent prognostic biomarkers for the management of patients with CRC, including microsatellite instability (MSI). Microsatellite instability is characterized by a deficient DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) system14. Apart from the classic form of MSI, there exists another variant known as elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST), which exclusively occurs at tetranucleotide microsatellite DNA sequences, delineating its distinct nature15. EMAST is a genetic variation present in over thirty percent of CRC patients16. Furthermore, the EMAST biomarker has recently been proposed to significantly correlate with tumor metastasis and poor prognosis17. In this regard, our previous study investigated the precise association between EMAST phenomenon and Snail as a gene related to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process in CRC patients18.
Here, we aimed to elucidate the association between angiogenesis-related genes with both tumor metastasis and EMAST subtypes of colorectal cancer. Hence, we provided a comprehensive examination of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes expression in CRC patients. We marked differences in the mean expression values of each gene in line with clinicopathological features such as metastatic state and EMAST biomarker and introduced novel biomarkers for evaluating cancer progression.
Materials and methods
We carried out a comprehensive evaluation of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes' expression in patients with colorectal cancer, particularly metastatic and EMAST subtypes (referred to mCRC and EMAST, respectively). We also conducted bioinformatics analysis through publicly available RNA sequencing and microarray datasets. Then, the gene regulatory network of angiopoietin-associated genes, including experimentally validated transcription factors, miRNAs, and lncRNAs sponging selected miRNAs were identified and ceRNA network was constructed. Finally, we examined the differential expression levels of the genes via RT-PCR (Fig. 1).
Data collection
TIMER2 (Tumor Immune Estimation Resource version 2, http://timer.cistrome.org/)19 was used to evaluate the expression of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A in tumor tissue from COAD and READ and in adjacent normal tissues of the TCGA project. Also, the Gene Expression database of Normal and Tumor tissues 2 (GENT2) (http://gent2.appex.kr/gent2/)20 was utilized to define the genes expression across microarray datasets. To collect gene expression datasets related to metastatic CRC, TNMplot database (https://www.tnmplot.com/) was utilized based on Gene Chip data21.
Diagnostic value of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A in CRC
To study the diagnostic value of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A, gene expression profiles of selected genes in COAD and READ were obtained from OncoDB database (https://oncodb.org/)22. Then, we evaluated the diagnostic value of selected genes in COAD and READ and their adjacent normal tissues utilizing https://analysistools.cancer.gov/biomarkerTools.
Co-expression analysis and PPI network
In this study, the top 50 genes positively and negatively correlated with ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A in colorectal cancer were obtained through LinkedOmics23. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network involving these selected genes was constructed using the STRING database (https://string-db.org) and visualized using Cytoscape software (version 3.9.1; https://cytoscape.org). Additionally, top genes exhibiting similar expression patterns to ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes were sourced from the GEPIA2 database24. An intersection analysis was conducted to identify common proteins interacting with these genes and the top 100 similarly expressed genes.
CeRNA network construction
This research recognizes miRNAs as regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression25, while Transcription Factors (TFs) play a pivotal role in influencing transcription rates during the pre-transcriptional stage26. miRNet (https://www.mirnet.ca/miRNet/home.xhtml)27 and TFcancer (http://lcbb.swjtu.edu.cn/tfcancer/gesearch.html)28 databases were used to determine the impact of TFs on the expression of selected genes in COAD and READ. The miRNAs targeting ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes were identified using mirDB (https://mirdb.org/mirdb/index.html)29 and DIANA-microT (https://dianalab.e-ce.uth.gr/microt_webserver/#/interactions)30. In addition, identified miRNAs were analysed in CancerMIRNome database (http://bioinfo.jialab-ucr.org/CancerMIRNome/) in order to identify experimentally validated miRNAs. Furthermore, circRNAs regulating these validated miRNAs were sourced from the circBank database (http://www.circbank.cn/)31, with a focus on those with a tot score exceeding 1000. Additionally, lncRNAs targeting selected miRNAs were identified utilizing miRNet and LncTarD2 (https://lnctard.bio-database.com/)32 databases. Finally, A competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network encompassing ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes, experimentally validated TFs influencing these genes, experimentally validated miRNAs targeting selected genes, and experimentally validated lncRNAs targeting the validated miRNAs was constructed using Cytoscape software33. Furthermore, NcPath database was utilized to enrich the ceRNA network (http://ncpath.pianlab.cn/#/Home)34.
Participants
Precisely 122 CRC patients who experienced surgery at Taleghani and Shohada Tajrish Hospitals of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences were recruited for this study. Our former studies assessed the EMAST status in the CRC patients35. Eligible individuals included in the study met the following criteria for inclusion: (a) patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma based on histological examination, (b) availability of pertinent clinical data and pathology reports, and (c) patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy utilizing either 5-FU or no treatment. Furthermore, the expression levels of VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, and ANGPT-2 were evaluated in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archived tumor samples and adjacent normal colorectal tissues, and their correlation with CRC metastasis, CRC patients’ survival, and EMAST biomarker was determined.
EMAST evaluation
As mentioned, we conducted an experiment evaluating EMAST phenotype among these patients in our previous study36. Concisely, the FFPE DNA extraction kit manufactured by QIAGEN GmbH (QIAGEN GmbH, Germany) was applied to extract DNA from tumor and normal adjacent FFPE tissues (NAT). A panel using five tetranucleotide markers, namely D9S242, MYCL1, D8S321, D20S82, and D20S85 was used for EMAST analysis. PCR optimization was carried out by using previously designed primers37.
Moreover, QIAxcel capillary electrophoresis, High-resolution cartridge, 25–500 nucleotide molecular markers, and 15–156 nucleotide align marker was employed for detachment of segments produced by PCR, and at the same time to provide a valid comparison between the microsatellite instability status in both tumor and NAT specimens of each patient37. Samples were classified as EMAST positive (EMAST+) when at least two of five markers showed a different pattern in tumor cells than normal. If just one or none of the microsatellite locus demonstrated a distinct pattern in tumor cells rather than normal, samples were defined as EMAST negative (EMAST−).
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
RNA was extracted from CRC and normal adjacent FFPE (NAT) samples via the RNeasy® FFPE kit (QIAGEN, Germany) as instructed by the manufacturer. RNA concentration and quality were measured using a Nano-Drop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Afterward, the isolated RNA went through a reverse transcription procedure using Prime Script-RT Master Mix (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan), following the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Once the complementary DNA (cDNA) had been synthesized, they were stored at − 20 °C.
Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR
The expression levels of angiogenic mediators were quantified with quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) using Light Cycler ABI 7500 Real-time PCR system and Maxima® SYBER Green/Rox with MicroAMP Optical 96-well reaction (Applied Biosystems, USA) pellet. The specific primers for VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and β-actin were designed (Table 1). The PCR amplification profile was run as follows: 30 s initial denaturation at 95 °C followed by 45 cycles of cycling stage: 95 °C for 5 s (Denaturation), 60 °C for 34 s (Annealing) and finally 72 °C for 30 s (Extension). Each sample was measured at least in duplicate. A total reaction volume of 20μl containing 0.4 μl of each primer, 10μl Maxima SYBER Green/Rox and 5μl cDNA was used for Real-time PCR analysis. Gene expression values for all specimens were analyzed using the 2−∆∆CT (Threshold cycle) approach, and these data were normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene, β-actin, forward and reverse primers. It is noteworthy that the efficacy of each primer was calculated using LinReg Software (version: 2017.1). The relative quantification (RQ) values were applied in statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis
All resulting data were statistically executed using GraphPad Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, USA) coupled with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The chi-square method was applied to assess the disparities among variables. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess whether our data follow normal distribution pattern or not. Accordingly, the information consistent with normal distribution was stated as mean ± standard deflection and examined with independent sample t-test. Otherwise, Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess whether the differences were statistically significant. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival were made using GraphPad prism software. In addition, a log-rank test was used to approach the contrast through survival curve groups. In the entire examination, P-values of less than 0.05 were affirmed statistically significant.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study adhered to the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, including obtaining written consent from all human research participants. All procedures were conducted under the oversight of the Ethics Committee of the Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (No: IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1395.136) in accordance with the university’s policies on medical and research ethics. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Results
ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A expression in colorectal cancer datasets.
Based on data retrieved by TCGA project, ANGPT-1 was significantly downregulated (P-value < 0.001) (Fig. 2A), while ANGPT-2 and VEGF-A were significantly upregulated in COAD and READ tissues compare to normal tissues (P-value < 0.001), respectively (Fig. 2B, C). Microarray data analysis via GENT2 database was also consistent to TCGA data (Supplementary File 1). To evaluate the gene expression profile in metastatic colorectal cancer, TNMplot was utilized. Notably all selected genes were significantly upregulated in metastatic colon tissues compared to normal tissues (P-value < 0.05) (Fig. 3).
Diagnostic values of ANGPT1, ANGPT2, and VEGF-A
Multiple studies have shown the diagnostic value of angiogenesis-related genes including S100A4, RBP4, and THBS2 in colorectal cancer38,39. Using RNA sequencing data obtained from OncoDB, ANGPT-2 (AUC = 90.8%) and VEGF-A (AUC = 95.1%) in COAD and VEGF-A in READ (AUC = 97.3%) had AUC > 90% and can be diagnostic factors for colorectal cancer (Supplementary File 1).
PPI and CO-expression Network shows VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 are co-expressed
ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A co-expressed genes were evaluated using LinkedOmics, which provided the data from TCGA-COAD-READ cohort. The heatmap and volcano plot of the top 50 positively and negatively correlated genes were constructed (supplementary File 1). The top positively and negatively correlated genes with ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2 and VEGF-A were OLFML1-COL4A1- GTPBP2 and C6ORF136-ELMO3-FECH, respectively. Furthermore, interacting genes were screened for protein–protein interactions (PPI) network construction using STRING database. PPI networks for ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A contained 11 nodes and 38 edges (Fig. 4A), 11 nodes and 42 edges (Fig. 4B), and 11 nodes and 51 edges (Fig. 4C), respectively. Besides, we performed an intersection analysis between interacted genes and the top 100 genes that have similar expression pattern with ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A obtained from GEPIA2. No genes identified as common gene between ANGPT-1 interacted and similar genes, however, VEGF-A and KDR were identified as common genes between ANGPT-2 interacted and similar genes. In addition, FLT-1, FLT-2, NRB-1, and KDR were common in VEGF-A interacted and similar genes (Supplementary File 1). There was a strong correlation between VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 and they co-express together. Since ANGPT-2 and VEGF-A are crucial regulators of vascular remodeling, co-targeting VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 in combination with chemotherapy in chemoresistant CRC xenograft models can be of paramount importance in future studies40.
The ceRNA network construction
Based on DIANA-microT and miRDB, 18 miRNAs were found as common miRNAs targeting ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes. Remarkably, hsa-miR-147b-5p was found as the miRNA targeting the three angiogenic genes. Among 18 identified miRNAs, hsa-miR-190a-3p, hsa-miR-374c-5p, hsa-miR-452-5p, and hsa-miR-889-3p were experimentally validated in TCGA COAD or READ tissues based on CancerMIRNome database (Supplementary File 1).
By utilizing CircBank database, 19 circRNAs were identified sponging hsa-miR-374c-5p. No circRNAs were found having interaction with hsa-miR-190a-3p, hsa-miR-452-5p, and hsa-miR-889-3p. A total of 203 lncRNAs were found which were related to 8 miRNAs, among 18 selected miRNAs. Among them, 5 lncRNAs, including CRNDE, AFAP1-AS1, KCNQ1OT1, MIR100HG, and MALAT1 were experimentally validated as a differentially expressed lncRNA based on LncTarD 2 (Supplementary Files 1, 2). AFAP1-AS1, KCNQ1OT, and MALAT1 were found sponging identified validated miRNAs.
Using miRNet database, a total of 72 TFs were identified in relation to ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, VEGF-A. Among identified TFs, Sp1, E2F1, and STAT3 were experimentally validated in COAD-READ tissues based on TFcancer database (Supplementary Files 1, 2).
The ceRNA network, including ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, VEGF-A, experimentally validated miRNAs (hsa-miR-190a-3p, hsa-miR-374c-5p, hsa-miR-452-5p, and hsa-miR-889-3p), lncRNAs (AFAP1-AS1, KCNQ1OT1 and MALAT1), and TFs (Sp1, E2F1, and STAT3) was constructed. Based on network analysis, a total of 82 significant pathways were identified which MAPK signaling pathway, FoxO signaling pathway, mTOR signaling pathway, Cell cycle, Focal adhesion, and Colorectal cancer were notable significant pathways (Fig. 5).
Altered gene expression of VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, and ANGPT-2 in colorectal cancer patients
To experimentally validate the differential expression of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes, Real-time PCR assay was employed on the specimens of 122 CRC patients. As shown in Fig. 6, the expression level of VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 genes were significantly higher in tumor tissues as compared with normal adjacent tissues (P-value < 0.001). Nevertheless, ANGPT-1 had a significantly lower expression pattern in tumor samples than normal colon tissue (P-value = 0.003).
Further, the association between overall survival (OS) and Angiogenesis-related gene expression was also assessed. Thirty-nine patients had died within 50 months of follow-up (range, 8–82 months). The whole patient cohort's median overall survival (OS) time was 50 months, with a nominal 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of 96%, 88%, and 49%, respectively. Further, the resulting data shows a significant association between high expression of VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 and decreased OS (P-value = 0.012 and P-value = 0.01 respectively). Additionally, ANGPT-1 downregulation was significantly associated with poor overall survival (P-value = 0.02) (Fig. 6).
Altered gene expression of VEGF-A and ANGPT-1 in EMAST+ colorectal cancer patients
The mean values of RQ for VEGF-A was discovered to be higher in patients with stage III/IV colorectal cancer (P-value = 0.001), but no statistically significant differential expression was identified between ANGPT-1 and ANGPT-2 expression and tumor stage. The expression level of all three angiogenesis-related genes was not significantly different in terms of tumor differentiation (P-value > 0.05).
Moreover, 43% of the CRC patients were detected with metastasis. Patients with metastatic CRC indicated a significantly higher mean value of RQ for VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 compared to non-metastatic CRC patients (P-value = 0.001). On the contrary, the expression level of ANGPT-1 was significantly lower in metastatic patients when compared with non-metastatic CRC patients (P-value < 0.05). Additionally, 40.2% of the patients were characterized as EMAST+ and 59.8% as EMAST−. The upregulation of VEGF-A and downregulation of ANGPT-1 was shown in EMAST+ phenotype (P-value = 0.002 and P-value = 0.04, respectively). However, there was no significant correlation between ANGPT-2 expression and EMAST phenotype. Table 2 provides data on marked differences in the mean values of RQ of each gene in line with clinicopathological features such as metastatic state and EMAST biomarker.
Discussion and future direction
Angiogenesis is a multistep mechanism necessary for CRC tumor development and progression, and it drives the metastasis of malignant tumor cells41. Numerous signaling pathways are associated with angiogenesis, including VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, and ANGPT-2, which significantly contribute to tumor growth and metastasis by providing oxygen, nutrients, and a safe microenvironment for tumor cells42. The rapid progress in identifying cancer biomarkers has shown promise in equipping precision medicine with the most appropriate treatment options based on the individual’s unique biomarker profile43,44. In this regard, genomic instability, particularly MSI, exhibits a pivotal role in tumor initiation and malignancies, and there is emerging evidence that this biomarker can be defined as a promising prognostic biomarker for CRC patients45. Previous studies on EMAST association with colorectal cancer similarly concluded a significant association between EMAST+ phenotype and advanced tumor stage in CRC46,47, and EMAST was previously reported to be involved in the metastatic spread of colorectal tumors and is associated with poor survival in patients with CRC15. Garcia et al. claimed that hypoxia induces genomic instability and is the link between EMAST+ phenotype and recurrent metastasis48. Since hypoxia is a major stimulator of angiogenesis, we can presume that angiogenesis is of paramount importance in EMAST+ cancer progression.
In our study, evaluating VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, and ANGPT-2 gene expression regarding clinicopathological features and also patient survival showed significantly increased expression levels of VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 in elevated tumor metastasis. Despite the significant positive correlation between VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 genes with metastasis, ANGPT-1 expression was significantly lower in patients with metastatic tumors. Previous investigations on the expression pattern of ANGPT-1 and ANGPT-2 in the plasma of patients with CRC indicated significantly higher expression levels of ANGPT-2 in patients with CRC, while the expression pattern of ANGPT-1 was not significantly different compared to healthy control. Moreover, the expression of ANGPT-2 was shown to be statistically upregulated in patients with stage IV tumors compared to patients with stage II tumors, while the expression of ANGPT-1 was unrelated to different colon cancer stages49. The present findings of our study are completely in line with the fact that blood vessel destabilization, caused by ANGPT-2 is a fundamental step in CRC aberrant angiogenesis. However, it is widely accepted that angiopoietins alone have limited potency, and they take part in the regulation of other angiogenic factors as well50. Like ANGPT-2, serum VEGF-A levels have been associated with the disease stage in CRC, with higher values being related to more advanced disease51,52,53. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is secreted by multiple cell types, including cancer cells, and plays a major role in endothelial cell survival, growth, differentiation, and migration. As previously reported, VEGF-expressing CRCs possess increased growth and metastatic potential compared to tumors with baseline VEGF expression51. In a cohort of 103 patients with mCRC, a high serum VEGF-A level was demonstrated as a valuable predictive biomarker of liver and lung metastasis54. Therefore, compelling evidence implies a prognostic value of highly-expressed VEGF in CRC, and its correlation with poor prognosis55,56. Our findings strongly correlate with these former studies and further throw light on defining VEGF as a potential prognostic biomarker of tumor behavior. Another significant finding of the present study was the close significant correlation between overexpression of VEGF and ANGPT-2 and poor overall survival. Other studies have also observed a significant correlation between ANGPT-2 gene expression and poor overall survival as well41,42,57.
In the current study, we identified a significant increased VEGF-A and decreased ANGPT-1 gene expression in EMAST+ phenotype in colorectal tumors. This could potentially be the primary underlying mechanism contributing to the increased metastasis and poor prognosis observed in EMAST+ colorectal cancer patients in our previous research36, which revealed a higher prevalence of microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) phenotype among patients diagnosed with Stage III and IV CRCs, compared to MSI-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. On the other hand, in that study, we observed that EMAST+ status was relatively frequent in MSI-L CRCs, and MSI-L/EMAST+ was also identified as an unfavorable prognostic marker in CRC patients, associated with increased metastasis and lower overall survival rates36.
When determining the genes with similar expressional patterns as ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A, we identified a strong correlation between VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 as they co-express together. Moreover, VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 commonly had KDR as an overlapped gene with similar expression pattern. Meanwhile, VEGF-A has been demonstrated to regulate angiogenesis and vascular permeability by activating VEGFR-2 (KDR)6. Since ANGPT-2 and VEGF-A are crucial regulators of vascular remodeling, future studies may focus on co-targeting VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 in combination with chemotherapy in chemo-resistant CRC xenograft models40.
The regulatory networks involved in VEGF-A, ANGPT-1, and ANGPT-2 differential expression, including non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and transcription factors (TFs) were also investigated. Consequently, we constructed the ceRNA network with three mRNAs, four miRNAs, three lncRNAs, and three TFs. Accordingly, 4 experimentally validated miRNAs were used for ceRNA network construction. One of them, hsa-miR-374c-5p, was previously shown to upregulate in response to 5-Fluorouracil and starvation in the human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line. This expression alteration was associated with increased autophagy of these cells and may be the mechanism of 5-Fluorouracil action in CRC patients as well58. Likewise, other studies further suggested hsa-miR-190a-3p and hsa-miR-452-5p as potential CRC diagnostic biomarkers59,60,61. Hence, investigating the role of ncRNAs and interpreting their interactions within ceRNA network could provide a deep insight into developing novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers, presuming that these networks are also active within EMAST+ phenotype. However, more experimental studies are required to ascertain the ncRNAs' roles in EMAST+ CRC angiogenesis and metastasis potential. In this study, after bioinformatically enriching the obtained ceRNA network, colorectal cancer was revealed as one of the notable significant pathways.
Transcription factors are also regulators of gene expression and can play essential roles in cancer progression and metastasis. Accordingly, using bioinformatics analysis, we found Sp1, E2F1, and STAT3 as the only experimentally validated TFs in COAD-READ registered tissues. STAT3 is a well-known transcription factor that regulates cell proliferation and promotes angiogenesis via upregulating VEGF in normal tissues. Nonetheless, STAT3 aberrant activity has been linked to cancer progression and metastasis by promoting the expression of pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF-A62,63. As a result, several oncogenic targets of STAT3, including VEGF, have been detected, and inhibitors of STAT3 have been developed as novel treatment strategies for cancer63,64. Additionally, STAT3 induces the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), which is another crucial mediator of angiogenesis. The simultaneous binding of both STAT3 and HIF-1α to the VEGF-A promoter leads to the maximum transcriptional activation and subsequent promotion of angiogenesis63. The other transcription factor, E2F1, is a member of the E2F family of transcription factors and has been implicated in cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in colon cancer cells. It was recently found that E2F1 also participates in the metastasis and chemoresistance of colon cancer65. The other experimentally validated transcription factor, Sp1, is also shown to increase the expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR66. Future studies may investigate the role of these TFs in EMAST+ phenotype in CRC patients and also delve into the underlying involved signaling pathways to develop new therapeutic targets.
Aberrant angiogenesis not only provides tumor cells with nutrient and oxygen, but it is also an effective barrier against the host immune system. Therefore, we also investigated the correlation of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A genes with immune gene signatures and found significant association of ANGPT-1 and VEGF-A expressions with most of the lymphocytes and immune system regulators, especially in COAD tissues (Supplementary 1) (http://cis.hku.hk/TISIDB/). These immunosuppressive effects by tumor cells have been a target of recent treatment strategies to circumvent immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment67,68. The tumor microenvironment functions as an intense barrier, primarily due to the disrupting impacts of irregularly patterned and tortuous tumor vessels on immune cells, leading to tumor progression and potentially facilitating tumor resistance to cancer therapies69. The disorganized vascular network within tumors significantly inhibits the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into the tumor microenvironment, thereby compromising their efficacy70,71. Additionally, in tumor-bearing hosts, VEGF-A can modulate the behavior of other immune cell populations, including regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages, consequently giving rise to the development of tumor-promoting (immunosuppressive) M2-like macrophages72,73. Hence, angiogenesis and immunosuppression are closely associated and occur simultaneously in response to stimuli. As shown in this study, ANGPT1 and VEGF-A are closely associated with EMAST+ phenotype of CRC, and therefore, experimentally investigating the association between EMAST+ phenotype with immune signatures can be of paramount importance. Combining anti-angiogenic therapy with immunotherapy may demonstrate a synergistic effect on EMAST+ tumor suppressive strategies.
At the moment, the most frequently clinically approved anti-angiogenesis drugs are VEGF inhibitors, such as Bevacizumab. Albeit, anti-VEGF drugs confront certain limitations, such as low progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor resistance13. Moreover, it is essential to consider that multiple pathways are responsible for regulating tumor angiogenesis, and in cases where one pathway is obstructed, alternative pathways may compensate. This highlights the significance of targeting additional angiogenic pathways, such as angiopoietins74. In this regard, Trebananib is a peptide inhibitor that neutralizes both ANGPT-1 and ANGPT-2 interaction with the Tie-2 receptor, reducing tumor angiogenesis75. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Bevacizumab and Trebananib combination therapy in the absence of chemotherapy, researchers conducted a first-line treatment study targeting metastatic colorectal cancer. This study revealed satisfactory efficacy of the dual anti-angiogenic combination therapy, as evidenced by the occurrence of durable responses76. Moreover, ongoing research is being conducted on Nesvacumab and MEDI-3617, which are high-affinity monoclonal antibodies functioning as anti-ANGPT-2 agents77,78,79 (Supplementary File 1; see https://clinicaltrials.gov/ and https://www.dgidb.org/ for more details). At present, the combination of anti-angiogenesis therapy with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy has been approved for clinical application and has dramatically improved the survival rates of cancer patients75,80.
In summary, the data gathered from the current study suggests that angiogenesis-related genes, specifically ANGPT-1 and VEGF-A, may play a significant role in increased metastasis and relatively poorer survival outcomes observed in EMAST+ colorectal cancer. These findings highlight the potential importance of targeting angiogenic pathways in the management of EMAST+ colorectal cancer to improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, EMAST biomarker can be referred to as an additional aspect of Consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) biology, due to the fact that CMS4 tumors display activated angiogenesis and worse overall survival. The Consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification of CRC currently classifies colon tumors into four subclasses by gene expression profiles, and among them, CMS4 is more likely to form metastasis81. It is suggested that a combination of factors used in this new classification system, including angiogenesis-related ones, can have superior predictive value and play a fundamental role in the metastatic dissemination of CMS4 tumors. Further research is required to deeply determine the functional mechanisms of ANGPT-1, ANGPT-2, and VEGF-A in EMAST+ CRC progress and metastasis.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we identified a significant increased VEGF-A and decreased ANGPT-1 expressions in EMAST+ colorectal tumors in CRC patients. Moreover, our study identified a significant association between VEGF-A and ANGPT-2 overexpression, as well as ANGPT-1 downregulation with colorectal tumor metastasis and reduced overall survival. Through in-silico analysis, we expanded our study by constructing regulatory networks that encompassed these angiogenic genes in colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the generalizability of these findings to EMAST+ colorectal cancer requires further experimental investigations. Based on accumulating data from the present study, it is proposed that EMAST biomarker can be referred to as an additional aspect of CMS4 biology. Since CMS4 tumors display activated angiogenesis and worse overall survival, the results of this study may be beneficial to guide personalized treatments.
Data availability
The experimental data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The in-silico analyses conducted in this study, as well as the datasets presented, are accessible through online repositories. The names of these repositories, along with the accession numbers, were provided in the article.
Abbreviations
- AUC:
-
Area under curve
- ANGPT1:
-
Angiopoietin-1
- ANGPT2:
-
Angiopoietin-2
- CeRNA:
-
Competitive endogenous RNA
- CircRNA:
-
Circular RNA
- CMS:
-
Consensus molecular subtype
- COAD:
-
Colon adenocarcinoma
- CRC:
-
Colorectal cancer
- DEG:
-
Differentially expressed gene
- EMAST:
-
Elevated microsatellite alteration at selected tetranucleotide repeats
- EMT:
-
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- GEO:
-
Gene expression omnibus
- GENT2:
-
Gene expression database of normal and tumor tissues 2
- LncRNA:
-
Long noncoding RNA
- MiRNA:
-
Micro RNA
- MMR:
-
Mismatch repair
- MSI:
-
Microsatellite instability
- NAT:
-
Normal adjacent tissues
- PPI:
-
Protein–protein interaction
- READ:
-
Rectum adenocarcinoma
- RQ:
-
Relative quantification
- TF:
-
Transcription factor
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- VEGFR:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors
References
Lugano, R., Ramachandran, M. & Dimberg, A. Tumor angiogenesis: Causes, consequences, challenges and opportunities. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77(9), 1745–1770 (2020).
Cao, Y., Langer, R. & Ferrara, N. Targeting angiogenesis in oncology, ophthalmology and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 22(6), 476–495 (2023).
Ionescu, C. et al. The angiogenic balance and its implications in cancer and cardiovascular diseases: An overview. Medicina. 58(7), 903 (2022).
Duran, C. L. et al. Targeting Tie2 in the tumor microenvironment: From angiogenesis to dissemination. Cancers. 13(22), 5730 (2021).
Wang, R. et al. B7–H3 promotes colorectal cancer angiogenesis through activating the NF-κB pathway to induce VEGFA expression. Cell Death Dis. 11(1), 55 (2020).
Shibuya, M. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Its receptor (VEGFR) signaling in angiogenesis: A crucial target for anti- and Pro-angiogenic therapies. Genes. Cancer. 2(12), 1097–1105 (2011).
Ahluwalia, A., Jones, M. K., Szabo, S. & Tarnawski, A. S. Aberrant, ectopic expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors 1 and 2 in malignant colonic epithelial cells Implications for these cells. growth via an autocrine mechanism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 437(4), 515–520 (2013).
Jayasinghe, C., Simiantonaki, N. & Kirkpatrick, C. J. Cell type- and tumor zone-specific expression of pVEGFR-1 and its ligands influence colon cancer metastasis. BMC Cancer. 15, 104 (2015).
Dinami, R. et al. TRF2 and VEGF-A: An unknown relationship with prognostic impact on survival of colorectal cancer patients. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39(1), 111 (2020).
Hong, S. et al. Expressions and clinical significances of angiopoieTIN-1, angiopoietin-2, and Tie-2 receptor in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann. Coloproctol. 33(1), 9–15 (2017).
Stoeltzing, O. et al. Angiopoietin-1 inhibits vascular permeability, angiogenesis, and growth of hepatic colon cancer tumors. Cancer Res. 63(12), 3370–3377 (2003).
Ahmad, S. A. et al. Differential expression of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 in colon carcinoma. A possible mechanism for the initiation of angiogenesis. Cancer. 92(5), 1138–1143 (2001).
Parmar, D. & Apte, M. Angiopoietin inhibitors: A review on targeting tumor angiogenesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 899, 174021 (2021).
Ye, M. et al. Concordance between microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein expression in colorectal cancer and their clinicopathological characteristics: A retrospective analysis of 502 cases. Front. Oncol. 13, 1178772 (2023).
Carethers, J. M., Koi, M. & Tseng-Rogenski, S. S. EMAST is a form of microsatellite instability that is initiated by inflammation and modulates colorectal cancer progression. Genes. Basel. 6(2), 185–205 (2015).
Ranjbar, R. et al. EMAST frequency in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis and literature review. Biomark. Med. 14(11), 1021–1030 (2020).
Venderbosch, S. et al. EMAST is associated with a poor prognosis in microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 10(4), e0124538 (2015).
Mohammadpour, S. et al. High expression of Snail1 is associated with EMAST and poor prognosis in CRC patients. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed. Bench. 12(Suppl1), S30–S36 (2019).
Li, T. et al. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucl. Acids Res. 48(W1), W509–W514 (2020).
Park, S. J., Yoon, B. H., Kim, S. K. & Kim, S. Y. GENT2: An updated gene expression database for normal and tumor tissues. BMC Med. Genom. 12(Suppl 5), 101 (2019).
Bartha, Á. & Győrffy, B. TNMplot.com: A web tool for the comparison of gene expression in normal, tumor and metastatic tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(5), 2622 (2021).
Tang, G., Cho, M. & Wang, X. OncoDB: An interactive online database for analysis of gene expression and viral infection in cancer. Nucl. Acids Res. 50(D1), D1334–D1339 (2022).
Vasaikar, S. V., Straub, P., Wang, J. & Zhang, B. LinkedOmics: Analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types. Nucl. Acids Res. 46(D1), D956–D963 (2018).
Tang, Z., Kang, B., Li, C., Chen, T. & Zhang, Z. GEPIA2: An enhanced web server for large-scale expression profiling and interactive analysis. Nucl. Acids Res. 47(W1), W556–W560 (2019).
Slezak-Prochazka, I., Durmus, S., Kroesen, B. J. & van den Berg, A. MicroRNAs, macrocontrol: Regulation of miRNA processing. RNA. 16(6), 1087–1095 (2010).
Zaret, K. S. Pioneer transcription factors initiating gene network changes. Ann. Rev. Genet. 54, 367–385 (2020).
Chang, L., Zhou, G., Soufan, O. & Xia, J. miRNet 2.0: Network-based visual analytics for miRNA functional analysis and systems biology. Nucl. Acids Res. 48(W1), W244–W251 (2020).
Huang, Q. et al. Tfcancer: A manually curated database of transcription factors associated with human cancers. Bioinformatics. 37(22), 4288–4290 (2021).
Chen, Y. & Wang, X. miRDB: An online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucl. Acids Res. 48(D1), D127–D131 (2020).
Tastsoglou, S. et al. DIANA-microT 2023: Including predicted targets of virally encoded miRNAs. Nucl. Acids Res. 51(W1), W148–W153 (2023).
Liu, M., Wang, Q., Shen, J., Yang, B. B. & Ding, X. Circbank: A comprehensive database for circRNA with standard nomenclature. RNA Biol. 16(7), 899–905 (2019).
Zhao, H. et al. LncTarD 2.0: an updated comprehensive database for experimentally-supported functional lncRNA–target regulations in human diseases. Nucl. Acids Res. 51(D1), D199–D207 (2022).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13(11), 2498–2504 (2003).
Li, Z. et al. NcPath: A novel platform for visualization and enrichment analysis of human non-coding RNA and KEGG signaling pathways. Bioinformatics. 39(1), 812 (2023).
Esfahani, A. T., Seyedna, S., Mojarad, E. N., Majd, A. & Aghdaei, H. A. TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway as a candidate for EMAST phenotype in colorectal cancer patients. World Cancer Res. J. 7, e1470 (2020).
Torshizi Esfahani, A., Seyedna, S. Y., Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, E., Majd, A. & Asadzadeh, A. H. MSI-L/EMAST is a predictive biomarker for metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. J. Cell Physiol. 234(8), 13128–13136 (2019).
Torshizi Esfahani, A., Seyedna, S. Y., Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, E., Majd, A. & Asadzadeh, A. H. MSI-L/EMAST is a predictive biomarker for metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. J. Cell. Physiol. 234(8), 13128–13136 (2019).
Fei, W. et al. RBP4 and THBS2 are serum biomarkers for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 8(54), 92254–92264 (2017).
Stein, U. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of metastasis inducer S100A4 transcripts in plasma of colon, rectal, and gastric cancer patients. J. Mol. Diagn. 13(2), 189–198 (2011).
Goede, V. et al. Identification of serum angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker for clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy. Br. J. Cancer. 103(9), 1407–1414 (2010).
Chung, Y. C., Hou, Y. C., Chang, C. N. & Hseu, T. H. Expression and prognostic significance of angiopoietin in colorectal carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 94(7), 631–638 (2006).
Asahara, T. et al. Tie2 receptor ligands, angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2, modulate VEGF-induced postnatal neovascularization. Circ. Res. 83(3), 233–240 (1998).
Crutcher, M. & Waldman, S. Biomarkers in the development of individualized treatment regimens for colorectal cancer. Front. Med. Lausanne. 9, 1062423 (2022).
Sveen, A., Kopetz, S. & Lothe, R. A. Biomarker-guided therapy for colorectal cancer: Strength in complexity. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17(1), 11–32 (2020).
Élez, E. et al. A comprehensive biomarker analysis of microsatellite unstable/mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer cohort treated with immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(1), 118 (2022).
Watson, M. M., Lea, D., Rewcastle, E., Hagland, H. R. & Søreide, K. Elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotides in early-stage colorectal cancers with and without high-frequency microsatellite instability: same, same but different?. Cancer Med. 5(7), 1580–1587 (2016).
Devaraj, B. et al. Relationship of EMAST and microsatellite instability among patients with rectal cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 14(10), 1521–1528 (2010).
Garcia, M. et al. Association between recurrent metastasis from stage II and III primary colorectal tumors and moderate microsatellite instability. Gastroenterology. 143(1), 48-50.e1 (2012).
Engin, H. et al. Plasma concentrations of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2 and Tie-2 in colon cancer. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 23(2), 68–71 (2012).
Angelucci, A., Delle Monache, S., Cortellini, A., Di Padova, M. & Ficorella, C. Vessels in the storm: Searching for prognostic and predictive angiogenic factors in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(1), 299 (2018).
Al Bitar, S., El-Sabban, M., Doughan, S. & Abou-Kheir, W. Molecular mechanisms targeting drug-resistance and metastasis in colorectal cancer: Updates and beyond. World J. Gastroenterol. 29(9), 1395–1426 (2023).
Bendardaf, R., El-Serafi, A., Syrjänen, K., Collan, Y. & Pyrhönen, S. The effect of vascular endothelial growth factor-1 expression on survival of advanced colorectal cancer patients. Libyan J. Med. 12(1), 1290741 (2017).
Bayhan, Z. et al. Serum cytokine levels in patients with colorectal cancers according to tumor stages and VEGF gene polymorphism. Hepatogastroenterology. 61(135), 1889–1894 (2014).
Divella, R. et al. Circulating levels of VEGF and CXCL1 are predictive of metastatic organotropismin in patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 37(9), 4867–4871 (2017).
Cascinu, S. et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor can predict event-free survival in stage II colon cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 6(7), 2803–2807 (2000).
Martins, S. F. et al. Clinicopathological correlation and prognostic significance of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 10(2), 55–67 (2013).
Ochiumi, T. et al. Clinical significance of angiopoietin-2 expression at the deepest invasive tumor site of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 24(3), 539–547 (2004).
Hou, N. et al. MicroRNA profiling in human colon cancer cells during 5-fluorouracil-induced autophagy. PLoS One. 9(12), e114779 (2014).
Chen, X. et al. Zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 7C (ZBTB7C) expression as an independent prognostic factor for colorectal cancer and its relevant molecular mechanisms. Am. J. Trans. Res. 12(8), 4141–4159 (2020).
Xue, W. et al. miRNA-Based signature associated with tumor mutational burden in colon adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 11, 634841 (2021).
Motieghader, H., Kouhsar, M., Najafi, A., Sadeghi, B. & Masoudi-Nejad, A. mRNA-miRNA bipartite network reconstruction to predict prognostic module biomarkers in colorectal cancer stage differentiation. Mol. Biosyst. 13(10), 2168–2180 (2017).
Zhou, Y. & Chen, J. J. STAT3 plays an important role in DNA replication by turning on WDHD1. Cell Biosci. 11(1), 10 (2021).
Tolomeo, M. & Cascio, A. The multifaced role of STAT3 in cancer and its implication for anticancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(2), 603 (2021).
Pan, C. F. et al. Weichang’an formula inhibits tumor growth in combination with bevacizumab in a murine model of colon cancer-making up for the deficiency of bevacizumab by inhibiting VEGFR-1. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 512598 (2020).
Fang, Z., Lin, M., Li, C., Liu, H. & Gong, C. A comprehensive review of the roles of E2F1 in colon cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 10(3), 757–768 (2020).
Pathi, S. et al. Aspirin inhibits colon cancer cell and tumor growth and downregulates specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors. PLoS One. 7(10), e48208 (2012).
Leong, A. & Kim, M. The angiopoietin-2 and TIE pathway as a therapeutic target for enhancing antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(22), 8689 (2020).
Ragusa, S. et al. Antiangiogenic immunotherapy suppresses desmoplastic and chemoresistant intestinal tumors in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 130(3), 1199–1216 (2020).
Schaaf, M. B., Garg, A. D. & Agostinis, P. Defining the role of the tumor vasculature in antitumor immunity and immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 9(2), 115 (2018).
Kim, C. G. et al. VEGF-A drives TOX-dependent T cell exhaustion in anti–PD-1–resistant microsatellite stable colorectal cancers. Sci. Immunol. 4(41), 0555 (2019).
Lee, W. S., Yang, H., Chon, H. J. & Kim, C. Combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade normalizes vascular-immune crosstalk to potentiate cancer immunity. Exp. Mol. Med. 52(9), 1475–1485 (2020).
Ribatti, D. Immunosuppressive effects of vascular endothelial growth factor. Oncol. Lett. 24(4), 369 (2022).
Jung, K. et al. Targeting CXCR4-dependent immunosuppressive Ly6C(low) monocytes improves antiangiogenic therapy in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114(39), 10455–10460 (2017).
Vimalraj, S. A concise review of VEGF, PDGF, FGF, Notch, angiopoietin, and HGF signalling in tumor angiogenesis with a focus on alternative approaches and future directions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 221, 1428–1438 (2022).
Liontos, M., Lykka, M., Dimopoulos, M. A. & Bamias, A. Profile of trebananib (AMG386) and its potential in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Oncol. Targets Ther. 7, 1837–1845 (2014).
Mooi, J. et al. Dual antiangiogenesis agents bevacizumab plus trebananib, without chemotherapy, in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a phase II study. Clin. Cancer Res. 27(8), 2159–2167 (2021).
Hyman, D. M. et al. Phase I study of MEDI3617, a selective angiopoietin-2 inhibitor alone and combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or bevacizumab for advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 24(12), 2749–2757 (2018).
Daly, C. et al. Angiopoietin-2 functions as a Tie2 agonist in tumor models, where it limits the effects of VEGF inhibition. Cancer Res. 73(1), 108–118 (2013).
Papadopoulos, K. P. et al. A phase I first-in-human study of nesvacumab (REGN910), a fully human anti–angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 22(6), 1348–1355 (2016).
Vergote, I. et al. Trebananib or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-3/ENGOT-ov2/GOG-3001): A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. Oncol. 20(6), 862–876 (2019).
Okita, A. et al. Consensus molecular subtypes classification of colorectal cancer as a predictive factor for chemotherapeutic efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 9(27), 18698–18711 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The research has been supported by the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The authors extend their sincere appreciation to Sajad Shojaei and also the dedicated staff of the Cancer Department at the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Funding
The research has been supported by the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 948). This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-pr’fit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Methodology, and Project Administration: E.N.M. and Z.S.; In Silico Design: Z.S.; In silico Data Collection and Analysis: P.J. and Z.S.; Experimental Design: E.N.M. Experimental Data Screening and Data Collection: A.T.E., S.M., and R.K., S.T., A.P., and E.N.M.; Draft Writing: A.T.E., P.J., A.Y.; Draft Review and Editing: Z.S., A.Y., P.Y. and E.N.M. All Authors Approved the Final Version to be published. They all agreed to be accountable for all Aspects of the work. This study was approved by the by the ethical committee of the Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (No: IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1395.136). Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Torshizi Esfahani, A., Mohammadpour, S., Jalali, P. et al. Differential expression of angiogenesis-related genes ‘VEGF’ and ‘angiopoietin-1’ in metastatic and EMAST-positive colorectal cancer patients. Sci Rep 14, 10539 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61000-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61000-x
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.