Abstract
Twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) provides a fascinating platform for engineering flat bands and inducing correlated phenomena. By designing the stacking architecture of graphene layers, twisted multilayer graphene can exhibit different symmetries with rich tunability. For example, in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene (tMBG) which breaks the C2z symmetry, transport measurements reveal an asymmetric phase diagram under an out-of-plane electric field, exhibiting correlated insulating state and ferromagnetic state respectively when reversing the field direction. Revealing how the electronic structure evolves with electric field is critical for providing a better understanding of such asymmetric field-tunable properties. Here we report the experimental observation of field-tunable dichotomic electronic structure of tMBG by nanospot angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (NanoARPES) with operando gating. Interestingly, selective enhancement of the relative spectral weight contributions from monolayer and bilayer graphene is observed when switching the polarity of the bias voltage. Combining experimental results with theoretical calculations, the origin of such field-tunable electronic structure, resembling either tBLG or twisted double-bilayer graphene (tDBG), is attributed to the selectively enhanced contribution from different stacking graphene layers with a strong electron-hole asymmetry. Our work provides electronic structure insights for understanding the rich field-tunable physics of tMBG.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Magic angle twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) has attracted extensive research interests due to the flat band1 near the Fermi energy EF with emergent correlated phenomena, such as superconductivity2, Mott insulating state3, and ferromagnetism4,5. By increasing the number of graphene layers, twisted multilayer graphene (tMLG) can exhibit a rich spectrum of stacking configurations with distinct symmetries6,7,8,9, providing additional controlling knobs for tailoring the physical properties. For example, tunable spin-polarized correlated states have been reported in twisted double-bilayer graphene (tDBG)10,11,12,13, and correlated states with non-trivial band topology have been reported in rhombohedral trilayer graphene14,15,16.
Among various structures of tMLG, twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene (tMBG) with a lower symmetry is particularly fascinating17,18,19,20,21,22. Unlike tBLG and tDBG which have symmetric stacking, the asymmetric stacking of monolayer graphene on Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene in tMBG breaks the C2z symmetry (Fig. 1a), making it asymmetric or “polar” along the out-of-plane direction. Applying an out-of-plane electric field can further enhance the asymmetry, giving rise to a rich phase diagram which strongly depends on the field direction. So far, transport measurements have reported an asymmetric field-tunable phase diagram19, which changes from a correlated phase (similar to tBLG) to a ferromagnetic phase (reminiscent of tDBG) when reversing the electric field direction. Such field-tunable correlated phenomena suggest a strong modification of electronic structure under the application of an electric field. Directly probing how the actual electronic structure evolves with electric field is therefore critical for providing a better understanding of such dichotomic field-tunable physics.
Here, by performing NanoARPES measurements (see schematic illustration in Fig. 1a) on tMBG with a twist angle of 2.2° with operando gating, we report the observation of a dichotomic response of the electronic structure to the electric field (induced by a bias voltage). The main experimental results are schematically summarized in Fig. 1b–d and supported by data shown in Fig. 1e–g. We find that, although the bottom bilayer graphene (2 ML) always has a weaker spectral intensity compared with top monolayer (1 ML) graphene, a positive bias voltage (induced electric field Eind pointing from monolayer to bilayer) enhances the relative spectral weight contribution from 1 ML graphene (pointed by red arrow in Fig. 1e) as well as the conical shaped feature, while a negative bias voltage enhances the relative contribution from 2 ML graphene, leading to flatter electronic structure near the Fermi energy (Fig. 1g). A comparison between the experimental results with theoretical calculations allows to reveal the origin of dichotomic field-tunable properties of tMBG from an electronic structure perspective.
Identifying the flat band, monolayer and bilayer graphene features in tMBG
The high-quality tMBG sample was prepared by the clean dry transfer method23,24 (see method and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2 for more details). The twist angle was determined from the moiré period using lateral force atomic force microscope (L-AFM) measurements and further confirmed by NanoARPES measurements (see Supplementary Figs. 3, 4). Figure 2a–f shows NanoARPES intensity maps measured at energies from EF to −0.5 eV with twist angle of 2.2°. The Fermi surface map shows two intensity spots at the Brillouin zone (BZ) corners of the top monolayer graphene (red dot, K1) and the bottom bilayer graphene (blue dot, K2) respectively, with weaker replicas at the moiré superlattice Brillouin zone (mSBZ) corners. Moving down in energy, these spots expand into pockets and hybridize with each other, resulting in a flower-shaped pattern at higher binding energy (Fig. 2d–f). Here the choice of twist angle of 2.2° is ideal for the investigation of the electronic structure and its field tunability, because the slightly larger angle than the magic angle makes it easier to resolve the contributions from monolayer and bilayer graphene, meanwhile the flat band can still be observed.
The high-quality NanoARPES data allow to resolve the flat band and identify spectral features from monolayer and bilayer graphene. Figure 2g shows dispersion image measured by cutting through two mSBZ corners as schematically illustrated in the inset. An isolated flat band (pointed by red arrow) is observed with a clear hybridization gap (pointed by black arrow), which separates the flat band from the remote bands at higher binding energy. Similar features are also captured by the calculated spectrum shown in Fig. 2h using an effective tight-binding model (see Method for more details), where red and blue colors represent projected contributions from the top 1 ML and bottom 2 ML graphene layers respectively. From the experimental data, the extracted bandwidth of the flat band is 70 ± 10 meV (see Supplementary Fig. 5 for more details), which is comparable to the calculated Coulomb energy3, Ueff = e2/(4πϵ0ϵrλm) = 75 meV, where ϵ0 and ϵr are the dielectric constants of the vacuum and the substrate respectively, and λm is the moiré period. The similar energy scales between the bandwidth and the Coulomb energy suggest that 2.2° tMBG is near the correlated regime, in line with the larger range of twist angle where the flat band exists9,25,26. Figure 2i shows dispersion image measured by cutting through the BZ corners of both monolayer and bilayer graphene, and the calculated spectrum is shown in Fig. 2j for comparison. An overall conical dispersion (guided by red dashed curves in Fig. 2i) is observed around K1 together with their moiré replica bands (brown dashed curves), and two parabolic bands from bilayer graphene (blue dashed curves) are observed near K2. In the region where these bands overlap, there is a strong intensity suppression and the flat band emerges as a result of the interlayer interaction (see Supplementary Fig. 5), similar to the case of tBLG27,28, while here the asymmetric stacking of tMBG provides additional field-tunability. We note that while the hybridization gap (pointed by black arrow in Fig. 2j) is too small to be resolved from the experimental data directly, however, a sudden change of intensity is observed at the flat band edge (Fig. 2i), suggesting an overall agreement with the calculated spectrum in Fig. 2j. The comparison between experimental results and theoretical calculations allows to reveal the flat band as well as spectroscopic contributions from monolayer and bilayer graphene, which lays an important foundation for further investigating the field-tunable electronic structure.
Dichotomic field-tunable electronic structure
Figure 3a–j shows an overview of dispersion images measured through K1 and K2 with bias voltages from −20 V to 30 V. Here the bias voltage Vg is applied on the bottom gate, which not only tunes the carrier concentration n, but also applies an electric field29,30. There are a few observations from the evolution of the electronic structure. First of all, a negative bias voltage (Eind pointing from bilayer to monolayer graphene) dopes the sample with holes and shifts the bands up, while a positive bias voltage leads to electron doping and shifts the bands down, showing the same trend as gated graphene devices29,30,31,32. From 0 V to 30 V, the bands shift in energy by 140 ± 30 meV (see Supplementary Fig. 6), which is consistent with the estimated carrier density from the geometric capacitance (see Supplementary Note 3 for more details). Secondly, the flat band near the Fermi energy can be selectively tuned to be more extended (flatter) or dispersive by switching the bias voltage (see Supplementary Fig. 7 for more details). For negative bias voltage, the flat band becomes more extended in the momentum space (red dotted curve in Fig. 3a), while for positive bias voltage, more pronounced “M-shaped” dispersion with a conical behavior is observed (red-to-blue dotted curve in Fig. 3j). Thirdly, the relative spectral weight contributions from monolayer and bilayer graphene can also be selectively enhanced by reversing the bias voltage, as indicated by red arrow in Fig. 3j and blue arrow in Fig. 3a (see Supplementary Fig. 8). This is also evident in the momentum distribution curves (MDCs) measured at a few representative bias voltages in Fig. 3k, where the red and blue dashed arrows indicate the relative spectral weight transfer to monolayer and bilayer graphene under positive and negative bias voltages respectively. Figure 3q shows a comparison between MDCs measured at bias voltages of −20 V (blue curve) and 30 V (red curve), where a relative spectral weight transfer from 2 ML to 1 ML bands is clearly observed when increasing the bias voltage.
The dichotomic field response of the electronic structure is also revealed in the calculated spectra in Fig. 3l–p, where a stronger relative spectral weight contribution is observed for monolayer valence band at positive bias voltage. Interestingly, at negative bias voltage (Fig. 3l), the enhanced relative spectral weight contribution from bilayer graphene in the valence band (blue arrow in Fig. 3l) is also accompanied by a reduced spectral weight contribution from the conduction of bilayer graphene (light blue arrow in Fig. 3l), suggesting a stronger electron-hole asymmetry than that at zero bias voltage (Fig. 3n). In addition, the application of a bias voltage also leads to flatter dispersion for bilayer graphene bands, similar to gated bilayer graphene33. Moreover, the calculated spectra show that the valence band at positive bias voltage shows similar dispersion to the conduction band at negative bias voltage (see Supplementary Fig. 9 for more details), suggesting that reversing the bias voltage can lead to a switching between the electron and hole bands in tMBG.
Origin of the field-tunable dichotomic electronic structure
To reveal the origin of the spectral weight transfer and the field-tunable electronic structure of tMBG, we show in Fig. 4 the comparison of calculated energy contours at −0.2 eV for tBLG, tMBG and tDBG under positive and negative bias voltages, respectively. For tBLG and tDBG, the energy contours remain similar when reversing the bias voltage (see comparison between Fig. 4a, d and Fig. 4c, f), except that the pattern centering at K1 now switches to K2 and vice versa, which is consistent with the overall symmetric phase diagram from transport measurements of tBLG4,34 and tDBG11,12,13. In sharp contrast, reversing the bias voltage leads to a dramatic change in the energy contour of tMBG (see Fig. 4b, e). Remarkably, the energy contour of tMBG under positive bias voltage (Fig. 4b) is strikingly similar to that for tBLG (Fig. 4a), while the energy contour under negative bias voltage (Fig. 4e) resembles that of tDBG (Fig. 4f), again supporting the asymmetric or “polar” electric field response.
To resolve the puzzle of how tMBG under bias voltage can exhibit electronic structures similar to tBLG and tDBG, we show in Fig. 4g–l energy contours at −0.2 eV projected onto each constitute graphene layers for tBLG, tMBG, and tDBG. For these three different types of twisted structures, the energy contours for graphene layers above the interface (L3 and L4) all exhibit clockwise vortex pattern centered at K1 (red dot), while the bottom layers (L1 and L2) show counter-clockwise vortex pattern centered at K2 (blue dot). This is consistent with their relative rotation directions in the real space, and reflects the chiral properties of twisted graphene structures35,36. Moreover, for positive bias voltage, the energy contours for the top graphene layers (L3 and L4) show a larger pocket size with an enhanced spectral weight, suggesting the enhanced contributions from top graphene layers (Fig. 4g–i), while for negative bias voltage, contributions from the bottom layers are enhanced (Fig. 4j–l) (see Supplementary Fig. 10 for the calculated layer-resolved density of states (DOS)). Therefore, although tMBG has one more layer (bottom layer, L1) than tBLG, the energy contour for tMBG under positive bias voltage is still similar to that of tBLG due to the smaller contribution of spectral weight from L1. The energy contour for tDBG, however, is quite different from tMBG, because tMBG lacks the top layer L4, which has a strong spectral weight. Similarly, for negative bias voltage, the energy contour of tMBG is overall similar to that of tDBG due to the smaller pocket of L4. Although the modulation in the spectral weight contribution of different layers is small, the asymmetric shape of pockets under reversed bias voltage is still significant enough to explain the origin of the overall asymmetric behavior in the tMBG.
The layer-projected electronic structure analysis suggests that the dichotomic field-tunable electronic structure under positive and negative bias voltages originates from the selectively enhanced contributions from different constitute graphene layers, which is also intrinsically related to the breaking of the C2z symmetry in tMBG. While a field-tunable electronic structure has been deduced from the asymmetric phase diagram reported in transport measurements19, our work provides direct electronic structure insights for understanding the field-tunable physics. In particular, by projecting the spectral contribution from each individual layer in the momentum space, our work also provides more complete and microscopic information on how the electric field actually tunes the electronic structure of each individual layer. We envision that similar strategies can be extended to other asymmetric twisted bilayer or multilayer systems, where the crystalline symmetry can be used as a tuning knob to obtain exotic properties, such as gate-tunable ferroelectricity and nonlinear optical response.
Methods
Sample preparation with gating capability
The tMBG sample was prepared by using the clean dry transfer method23,24. First, the graphene flake with both monolayer and bilayer parts connected together was exfoliated onto a clean SiO2/Si substrate. A thin BN flake attached to PVA/PDMS (Polyvinyl Alcohol/Polydimethylsiloxane) was then positioned above the graphene under an optical microscope to pick up the bilayer graphene part. The monolayer graphene on the SiO2/Si substrate was rotated by the desired angle and picked up by bilayer-graphene/BN/PVA/PDMS to form the tMBG/BN/PVA/PDMS structure. Subsequently, the tMBG/BN/PVA/PDMS was flipped over, and the tMBG/BN/PVA was picked up by another PDMS stamp to form PVA/BN/tMBG/PDMS structure. The PVA film was dissolved by immersing the entire structure in water for several hours, and the tMBG/BN was transferred onto a graphite flake, which was in contact with the gold-plated pattern as the bottom gate electrode. Finally, two narrow pieces of graphite were used to electrically connect tMBG and the gold-coated pattern to ensure good electrical conductivity for ARPES measurements. The gold-plated pattern was connected to the gating electrode of the sample holder by wire bonding. See Supplementary Figs. 1, 2 for more details.
AFM measurements
The twist angle can be determined by combining NanoARPES and lateral force AFM (L-AFM) measurements. For the L-AFM measurements, silicon nitride probes were used to obtain the lateral force and topography image under the contact mode. We note that L-AFM measurement is particularly sensitive to the moiré superlattice period because the stick-slip effect would occur at the moiré superlattice scale37. After extracting the moiré superlattice period λm from L-AFM measurements, the twist angle θ can be further determined by λm = a/(2sin(θ/2)).
ARPES measurements
The tMBG sample was annealed at 150 °C in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) until sharp dispersions were observed. NanoARPES measurements were performed at the beamline ANTARES of the synchrotron SOLEIL in France with a beam size of 500–700 nm and photon energy of 100 eV. The incident light is set to p-polarized and the analyzer slit direction is horizontal (see Supplementary Fig. 12). The overall energy and angular resolution were set to 50 meV and 0.1°, respectively. The measurement temperature was 70 K in a working vacuum better than 2 × 10−10 mbar.
Theoretical calculations
The electronic structure calculations are performed by using a real-space tight-binding model, where we define the Hamiltonian for tBLG, tMBG, and tDBG as
where εi and tij are the on-site potential energy of atom i and the hopping parameter between atom i and j. We use the effective tight-binding model parameters for εi and tij using either the monolayer38 version or the Bernal bilayer39 version depending on which part of the system is under consideration. We set the effective nearest hopping term t0 = − 3.1 eV and the interlayer hopping scaling factor S = 0.895 for the Scaled Hybrid Exponential (SHE) model40, to effectively match the Fermi velocity υF ≈ 1 × 106 m/s and the magic angle 1.08° of tBLG. In the calculations, a commensurate superlattice is used, and here we use a twist angle of 2.28° to perform the calculations, which is the closest commensurate twist angle near 2.2°. Classical structural relaxation using LAMMPS41,42 has been implemented in the calculation. In order to describe the electric field effect under applying bias voltages, we label the graphene layers from L1 (bottom layer) to L4 (top layer) as indicated by Fig. 4, and the potential energy for different layers are set to be V1 = − V4 = − 3Δ/2 and V2 = − V3 = − Δ/2. We note that a positive bias voltage Vg > 0 gives rise to Δ > 0, leading to an induced electric field Eind pointing from monolayer to bilayer graphene, where the total electric field contains Etotal = Eext + Eind contains the external electric field Eext and the induced electric field Eind. An adjustable chemical potential μ is used to introduce an overall shift in the tBLG, tMBG and tDBG bands to allow a fair comparison between bands at specific energy cuts (Fig. 4). To simulate the intensity of the ARPES data, we calculate the sublattice-resolved spectral functions using a band-unfolding method43,44,45, which enables to obtain the layer- or sublattice-resolved electronic structure calculation. The band unfolding code can be found as WannierTools46 on the GitHub. See Supplementary Fig. 11 and more calculation details in the Supplementary Information.
Data availability
All relevant data of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 12233–12237 (2011).
Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).
Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).
Sharpe, A. L. et al. Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605–608 (2019).
Serlin, M. et al. Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure. Science 367, 900–903 (2020).
Suárez Morell, E., Pacheco, M., Chico, L. & Brey, L. Electronic properties of twisted trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 87, 125414 (2013).
Khalaf, E., Kruchkov, A. J., Tarnopolsky, G. & Vishwanath, A. Magic angle hierarchy in twisted graphene multilayers. Phys. Rev. B 100, 085109 (2019).
Liu, J., Ma, Z., Gao, J. & Dai, X. Quantum valley hall effect, orbital magnetism, and anomalous hall effect in twisted multilayer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031021 (2019).
Ma, Z. et al. Topological flat bands in twisted trilayer graphene. Sci. Bull. 66, 18–22 (2021).
Burg, G. W. et al. Correlated insulating states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 520–525 (2020).
Cao, Y. et al. Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer-bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 215–220 (2020).
Liu, X. et al. Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 221–225 (2020).
Shen, C. et al. Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 520–525 (2020).
Chen, G. et al. Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nature 572, 215–219 (2019).
Chen, G. et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56–61 (2019).
Chen, G. et al. Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nat. Phys. 15, 237–241 (2019).
Polshyn, H. et al. Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator. Nature 588, 66–70 (2020).
Xu, S. et al. Tunable van Hove singularities and correlated states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 17, 619–626 (2021).
Chen, S. et al. Electrically tunable correlated and topological states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 17, 374–380 (2021).
He, M. et al. Competing correlated states and abundant orbital magnetism in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 12, 4727 (2021).
Li, S.-y et al. Imaging topological and correlated insulating states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 13, 4225 (2022).
Zhang, C. et al. Local spectroscopy of a gate-switchable moiré quantum anomalous hall insulator. Nat. Commun. 14, 3595 (2023).
Wang, L. et al. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 342, 614–617 (2013).
Cao, Y. et al. Superlattice-induced insulating states and valley-protected orbits in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 116804 (2016).
Rademaker, L., Protopopov, I. V. & Abanin, D. A. Topological flat bands and correlated states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033150 (2020).
Park, Y., Chittari, B. L. & Jung, J. Gate-tunable topological flat bands in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 102, 035411 (2020).
Utama, M. I. B. et al. Visualization of the flat electronic band in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle twist. Nat. Phys. 17, 184–188 (2021).
Lisi, S. et al. Observation of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 17, 189–193 (2021).
Nguyen, P. V. et al. Visualizing electrostatic gating effects in two-dimensional heterostructures. Nature 572, 220–223 (2019).
Joucken, F. et al. Visualizing the effect of an electrostatic gate with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 19, 2682–2687 (2019).
Nunn, J. E. et al. ARPES signatures of few-layer twistronic graphenes. Nano Lett. 23, 5201–5208 (2023).
Dale, N. et al. Layer-dependent interaction effects in the electronic structure of twisted bilayer graphene devices. Nano Lett. 23, 6799–6806 (2023).
Ohta, T., Bostwick, A., Seyller, T., Horn, K. & Rotenberg, E. Controlling the electronic structure of bilayer graphene. Science 313, 951–954 (2006).
Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).
Angeli, M. et al. Emergent D6 symmetry in fully relaxed magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 98, 235137 (2018).
Yananose, K. et al. Chirality-induced spin texture switching in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 104, 075407 (2021).
Zhang, S. et al. Dual-scale stick-slip friction on Graphene/h − BN moiré superlattice structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 226101 (2022).
Jung, J. & MacDonald, A. H. Tight-binding model for graphene π-bands from maximally localized wannier functions. Phys. Rev. B 87, 195450 (2013).
Jung, J. & MacDonald, A. H. Accurate tight-binding models for the π bands of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 89, 035405 (2014).
Leconte, N., Javvaji, S., An, J., Samudrala, A. & Jung, J. Relaxation effects in twisted bilayer graphene: A multiscale approach. Phys. Rev. B 106, 115410 (2022).
Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
Ku, W., Berlijn, T. & Lee, C.-C. Unfolding first-principles band structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 216401 (2010).
Lee, C.-C., Yamada-Takamura, Y. & Ozaki, T. Unfolding method for first-principles LCAO electronic structure calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 345501 (2013).
Nishi, H., Matsushita, Y.-i & Oshiyama, A. Band-unfolding approach to moiré-induced band-gap opening and Fermi level velocity reduction in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 95, 085420 (2017).
Wu, Q. et al. Wanniertools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405–416 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work is mainly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1400100, 2022YFA1403800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12234011, 52025024, 92250305, 11725418, 52388201, 12274436). H.Z. and C.B. acknowledge support from the Shuimu Tsinghua Scholar program, the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2022M721887, 2022M721886), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12304226). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers 20H00354 and 23H02052) and World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan. H.W. and Y.J. acknowledge support from the Informatization Plan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASWX2021SF-0102). J.J. acknowledges the funding from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through grant numbers NRF2020R1A2C3009142, the support by the Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) from the Innovative Talent Education Program for Smart Cities and the computational support from KISTI Grant No. KSC-2022-CRE-0514 and the resources of Urban Big data and AI Institute (UBAI) at UOS. Y.P. and N.L. were supported by the NRF through grant numbers NRF2020R1A5A1016518 and the Korean NRF through Grant RS-2023-00249414. We acknowledge SOLEIL for the provision of synchrotron radiation facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shuyun Z. conceived the research project. H.Z., Qian L., W.C., J.A., P.D., Qinxin L., and Shuyun Z. performed the NanoARPES measurements and analyzed the data. C.B., Shaohua Z. and Y.W. contributed to the data analysis and discussions. Qian L. prepared the tMBG samples. Qian L. and P.Y. performed the AFM measurements. K.W. and T.T. grew the BN crystals. Y.P., Y.J., J.L., N.L., Q.W., H.W., W.D., and J.J. performed the calculations. H.Z., Qian L., and Shuyun Z. wrote the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the discussions and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Li, Q., Park, Y. et al. Observation of dichotomic field-tunable electronic structure in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene. Nat Commun 15, 3737 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48166-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48166-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.