Abstract
The assembly of chiral molecules with multiple stereogenic elements is challenging, and, despite of indisputable advances, largely limited to toxic, cost-intensive and precious metal catalysts. In sharp contrast, we herein disclose a versatile C–H alkylation using a non-toxic, low-cost iron catalyst for the synthesis of substituted indoles with two chiral elements. The key for achieving excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity was substitution on a chiral N-heterocyclic carbene ligand providing steric hindrance and extra represented by noncovalent interaction for the concomitant generation of C–N axial chirality and C-stereogenic center. Experimental and computational mechanistic studies have unraveled the origin of the catalytic efficacy and stereoselectivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With the expanding importance of chiral molecules in various fields of chemistry, ranging from the pharmaceutical industry to agrochemistry, fragrances, and material science, the development of sustainable and highly selective methodologies allowing to rapidly access enantiopure complex molecules is amongst the most vivid fields of organic synthesis and catalysis1,2,3. While aiming for more sustainable synthesis, the expansion of the C–H activation field rapidly affording molecular complexity from simple, non-prefunctionalized substrates is certainly a key achievement4. However, the majority of stereoselective C–H functionalization strongly rely on the use of noble metal-based catalysts5,6,7,8,9,10, including palladium, iridium, or rhodium. In clear contrast, such transformation catalyzed by 3d-metals11,12, and in particular from the most abundant, low cost, and non-toxic iron13,14,15,16 (Fig. 1a), continues to be challenging. Indeed, various oxidation states of iron, combined with a diversity of reaction scenarios conceivable in a presence of such a catalyst and difficulty in isolating well-defined iron-complexes17,18,19,20, renders the chiral iron-catalysis still in its infancy.
Although a few asymmetric cross-coupling reactions catalyzed by chiral iron-phosphine21,22 and iron-oxazoline23,24 complexes have been achieved, the need to use prefunctionalized substrates and equivalent organometallic reagents limits their applications25,26,27 (Fig. 1b). And yet, while considering the complementary reactivity of iron-complexes and noble 4d- and 5d-metal catalyst, combined with often high reactivity of such complexes translating into mild reaction conditions28,29,30, stereoselective iron-catalyzed C–H activation holds great promise to expand the diversity of easily accessible enantiopure molecules. Building upon previous reports31, our group developed a highly enantioselective C–H alkylation of indoles with vinylferrocenes and electron-rich styrenes enabled by a newly designed chiral N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)32 catalyst15 (Fig. 1c). However, it is worth noting that there has been limited subsequent research on iron-catalyzed asymmetric C–H activation.
Over the decades, C-stereogenic molecules have focused major scientific interest to escape from flatness6. However, the diversity of chiral molecules spreads far beyond, englobing Si-, P- and S-stereogenic molecules33,34, or atropisomeric biaryls, heterobiaryls and styrenes35,36,37,38. Besides, restricted rotation around an N–Ar bond has also been attracting considerable attention from the scientific community39,40, progressively evolving from purely fundamental curiosity to an appealing tool for the design of highly selective drug candidates41,42,43,44 (Fig. 1d). Synthetic routes affording such compounds are yet rare and almost exclusively based on the use of noble metals45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52. Moreover, further increasing molecular complexity and the three-dimensional structure of the molecules by introducing simultaneously two chirality elements via a one-step process remains challenging53,54. In particular, the possibility of simultaneously controlling C–N atropoisomerism and C-central chirality has rarely been reported55,56,57,58. Despite the originality of these examples, the need for expensive and rare rhodium, iridium or palladium-catalysts seriously limits the synthetic potential of these transformations.
Inspired by previous research15,31,59, we were wondering if a more challenging C–N atroposelective transformation by iron catalysis could also be designed. Indeed, the introduction of a suitable, sufficiently sterically congested aromatic substituent on the N-atom could translate into the generation of an atropisomeric compound via the introduction of a substituent at the C2-position. Moreover, the possibility of generating an additional element of chirality by trapping the chiral metalacyclic intermediate with a prochiral coupling partner, such as olefin, appears as an ultimate challenge. Such an unprecedented transformation would involve not only the stereoselective olefin insertion but also simultaneously impose the configuration of the N–Ar bond thus promoting the formation of the indole product with two chiral elements.
Herein, we report an original, iron–NHC complex catalyzed asymmetric transformation delivering substituted indoles bearing both, C–N axial and C-central chirality, which is a unique and more challenging achievement to realize simultaneous stereocontrol of two chiral elements within one elementary step60 compared to single chiral center construction15 (Fig. 1e). The salient features of this reaction are: 1) the first example of iron-catalyzed C–N atroposelective reaction; 2) the first example of the use of iron-catalyst to build up complex molecules bearing both, axial and central chirality; 3) synthesis of various substituted indoles exhibiting complex three-dimensional structure. In addition to these synthetic values, detailed experimental and theoretical mechanistic studies allowed shedding light on the asymmetric iron-catalysis from a broader perspective.
Results and discussion
Optimization of reaction conditions
We initiated our studies into the stereoselective C–H alkylation of indole derivative 1a with styrene 2a using the Fe/NHC catalytic system (Fig. 2). Pleasingly, the desired alkylation product 3 was obtained in 51% yield with >95:5 diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) and 67% enantiomeric excess (e.e.) when using Fe(acac)3 as the metal catalyst and L1 as chiral ligand. Subsequently, the structure of the chiral NHC ligand was further probed. The perfect diastereocontrol have been achieved through careful ligand design. The introduction of a methoxy or phenoxy group at the para-position of the aromatic ring (L2, L3) had a minor effect on the stereoselectivity of the alkylation reaction, while the presence of an additional methoxy group at the meta-position (L4) translated into a severe decrease in both reaction efficiency and stereoselectivity. In contrast, a remarkably 95% e.e. was realized when a more electron-donating and less sterically demanding methoxy motif is present at the ortho-position of the ligand (L5). Further investigations into the role of the ortho-substituent of the aromatic ring revealed that the benzyloxy-substituted ligand (L6) is inefficient while isopropoxy-derived L7 furnished the desired product in the same 95% e.e., but a lower yield. The substitution pattern at the meta-position had a dramatic impact on the stereoinduction. While a tert-butyl derived ligand (L8) performed equally well as the adamantyl congener (L5), a significant drop in the stereoinduction to 75% e.e. was observed with a methyl-substituted L9.
Next, the reaction conditions were further optimized. The tuning of the reaction parameters, including solvent and temperature illustrated that high yield and enantioselectivity could be obtained when the reaction was performed in Et2O at a relatively low temperature. Remarkably, the optimal results in terms of isolated yield (90%), diastereo- (>95:5) and enantioselectivity (97%) were realized using a reduced amount of the chiral NHC ligand (10 mol%), reflecting the efficiency and potential of this new catalytic system (see Supplementary Table 2 for details).
Substrate scope
To delineate the robustness of the diastereo- and enantioselective iron catalysis, indoles bearing a variety of N-aryl substituents were explored (Fig. 3a). Electronic changes and the steric hindrance of the ortho-substituents of the N-aromatic ring had a minor impact on the stereoselectivity of this reaction (3–9, all >95:5 d.r., up to 98% e.e.) and the atropostability of the products was guaranteed even for the less hindered methyl-substituted product 4. Further studies showed that both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups on the indole ring were well tolerated, delivering the desired products 10–17 in moderate to good yields with excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivities (up to >95:5 d.r., 98% e.e.) (Fig. 3b). Notably, azaindole 1p was also a potent substrate, furnishing product 18 in a good yield with a high level of stereoselectivity (>95:5 d.r., 91% e.e.). The reaction scope regarding the alkene was also very broad (Fig. 3c). A variety of differently substituted alkenes bearing electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituents on the para-, meta- or ortho-position of aromatic ring furnished the desired products 19–31 in excellent stereoselectivities (all >95:5 d.r., 94-99% e.e.). 2-Vinylnaphthalene, 1-vinylnaphthalene, and vinylferrocene were compatible and afforded the target products 32–34 in good yields and enantioselectivities (90-99% e.e.). The absolute configuration of the alkylation products was confirmed unambiguously by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of indole product 3.
Scale-up and late-stage transformations
A gram-scale reaction of indole derivative 1a and styrene 2a was successfully performed, delivering the desired product 3 in 83% yield without deterioration of the stereoselectivity (Fig. 3d), thereby demonstrating the utility of the stereoselective iron catalysis in preparative-scale organic synthesis. The presence of the formyl group on the product provided also important opportunities for expanding the molecular diversity. Accordingly, the corresponding alcohol 35, olefin 36, and amino 37 were accessed without loss of optical purity, as shown in Fig. 3d.
Mechanistic studies
To gain insights into the reaction mechanism, a series of experiments were carried out (Fig. 4). First, the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) study suggested that the C–H cleavage is facile (Fig. 4a). The reaction of the C2-deuterated indole substrate [D]1-1a with styrene 2a afforded the product [D]1-3 together with 12% of the unreacted substrate, isolated as a 75:25 mixture of [D]1-39 and 39. As to the alkylation product [D]1-3, the significant transfer of the C2-deuterium from the indole into the methyl position (81% D) indicates that the C−H activation occurs by ligand-to-ligand hydrogen transfer (LLHT) or C−H oxidative addition (Fig. 4b). In addition, a competition experiment between two different substrates ([D]1-1a and 1k) suggested that there was no deuterium scrambling distribution (Fig. 4c). Non-linear effect studies revealed a linear relation between the enantiopurity of the ligand and the e.e. of the product formed (Fig. 4d). This result is suggestive of only one NHC ligand being involved in the control of the reaction stereoselectivity.
Further studies were pursued to 1) define the potential reactive iron-NHC species responsible for C–H activation and 2) obtain molecular-level insight into the role of the TMEDA additive in catalysis. For the latter, a recent report demonstrated the generation of a low-valent Fe-styrene species under similar reaction conditions which could be a precursor to a low-valent Fe-NHC complex for catalysis61. Consistent with this hypothesis, the synthesis of the Fe(0) species [Fe(Cy)(η2-styrene)3][MgCl(THF)5] (A) with the cyclohexyl Grignard reagent (CyMgCl) (Fig. 5a) and subsequent reaction with ligand L5 in the presence of excess CyMgCl led to the formation of a new iron species as identified by in situ freeze-trapped 80 K 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy (see Supplementary Information for details). This species was postulated to be a low-valent Fe(L5)(η2-styrene)2 complex (B) as related compounds have been reported in the literature62,63. These studies were further extended to evaluation of the in situ iron speciation during catalysis, where freeze-trapped 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy at 360 minutes into the C–H alkylation reaction revealed the presence of a single major iron species with parameters similar to B (Fig. 5b).
While B was not readily amenable to crystallographic analysis, utilizing the achiral surrogate SIMes•HCl (possessing a saturated backbone like L5) enabled access to the S = 1 iron(0) complex Fe(SIMes)(η2-styrene)2 (B*) (Fig. 5a) which, combined with Mössbauer parameter calculations (see Supplementary Information for details), further supported the assignment of B as Fe(L5)(η2-styrene)2. To evaluate the catalytic relevance of such low coordinate Fe-NHC species, the reaction of B* with indole substrate 1a resulted in the generation of the C–H alkylated product (rac)-3 (Fig. 5c). Overall, these results support Fe(L)(η2-styrene)2 species as the likely active iron species in the current system, accessed from the low-valent catalytic precursor [Fe(Cy)(η2-styrene)3]-.
Computational studies
To understand the mechanistic details and to account for the origins of stereoselectivity, we furthermore performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations64. The competing reaction pathways for the iron-catalyzed asymmetric C−H alkylation for (Ra,S)-conformer are shown in Fig. 6a. Initiating from the triplet iron(0) complex int1 ligated by chiral NHC and two styrenes, whose reactivity already had been verified experimentally (Fig. 5c), ligand exchange occurs forming substrate coordinated intermediate int2. Classic oxidative addition of the indole C−H bond to iron center via triplet three-membered transition state TS3 is viable, generating quintet iron(II) hydride int4. Subsequent olefin insertion into Fe−H bond is facile leading to quintet alkyl iron(II) intermediate int6. However, the competing LLHT pathway from int2 directly to int6 is more favorable by 4.7 kcal/mol than the oxidative addition with sequential olefin insertion into Fe−H bond. We also considered the possibility of olefin insertion into the Fe−C bond via four-membered transition state TS7, while this insertion is proven to be unfeasible. Therefore, LLHT is most likely the preferred pathway for the generation of the alkyl iron(II) intermediate int6, where free rotation over the C−N axis is still achievable (see Supplementary Fig. 19). Int6 then undergoes irreversible reductive elimination which is the rate- and enantio-determining step to release the product and meanwhile regenerate the catalytic active iron(0) species int1. It is worth mentioning that only the most stable spin state of each species is presented in Fig. 6a, for the free energy profile of all possible spin states see Supplementary Fig. 18.
Based on these experimental and computational findings, we became interested in the controlling factors of stereoselectivity. The four reductive elimination transition states are shown in Fig. 6b with respective optimized structures and energies. TS10(Ra,S) is at least 3.5 kcal/mol more favorable than the other three transition states TS10(Ra,R), TS10(Sa,S) and TS10(Sa,R). The coordination of methoxy group to the iron center stabilizes the transition state TS10(Ra,S) for major product. Moreover, noncovalent interactions play an important role in the stereoselectivity control. The CH–π interaction in TS10(Ra,S) and TS10(Ra,R) between the methoxyl group of the NHC ligand and indole determines the axial chirality. This CH–π interaction is confirmed by the independent gradient model (IGM) analysis65. The same CH–π interaction is not present in TS10(Sa,S) or TS10(Sa,R). On the contrary, the steric hindrance between the methoxy group and the isopropyl group of the substrate is instead dominant. Another stereoselectivity-controlling factor is π-π stacking interaction in transition state TS10(Ra,S) between the indole and phenyl group, which determines the central chirality. The energy decomposition analysis of TS10(Ra,S) also reflects the impact of the noncovalent interactions (Supplementary Fig. 20). The coordination in combination with noncovalent interaction in transition state TS10(Ra,S) highlights the key role of methoxy group of chiral NHC.
A highly efficient selective C−H alkylation of indoles with aryl alkenes was achieved by sustainable iron catalysis, leading to rare atropoenriched and enantioenriched substituted indoles with high structural diversity. This iron-catalyzed asymmetric C−H alkylation was viable at room temperature, demonstrating the great potential of iron catalysis in the field of stereoselective C−H activation. Detailed mechanistic studies by experiment, Mössbauer spectroscopy and computation revealed an iron(0) complex as catalytic active species and this iron(0) complex undergoes a LLHT process instead of classic C−H bond oxidative addition. Computational studies revealed that the involvement of the methoxy group in the side arm of the chiral NHC ligand is vital for providing both covalent and noncovalent interaction in the rate- and enantio-determining transition state. This insight emphasizes the necessity for the de novo design of chiral ligands in asymmetric synthesis. We envisioned that the present approach and the mechanistic findings will promote the development in related challenging iron-catalyzed C−H functionalization constructing multiple chiral centers.
Methods
General procedure for iron-catalyzed stereoselective C–H alkylation
To a flame-dried and N2-purged Schlenk tube were added indole substrate (0.1 mmol), Fe(acac)3 (0.01 mmol, 10 mol%) and chiral NHC ligand L5 (0.01 mmol, 10 mol%). The Schlenk tube was then sealed, purged and backfilled with N2 three times. Et2O (0.2 mL), TMEDA (0.2 mmol) and alkene substrate (0.15 mmol) were added via syringe. CyMgBr (1 M in THF, 0.05 mmol, 0.05 mL) was then added dropwise and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 72 hours. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted with THF (2.0 mL) and quenched with HCl aqueous solution (1 M, 1.0 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours. The phases were then separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (5.0 mL ×3). The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The diastereomeric ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1) to afford the desired product.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the main text, the Supplementary Information and the Supplementary Data. Details about materials, methods, experimental procedures, characterization data, NMR and HPLC spectra are available in the Supplementary Information, cartesian coordinates and atomic coordinates are available in the Supplementary Data and all other data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, under deposition numbers CCDC 2176328 (3), CCDC 2296422 (A), CCDC 2296423 (B*). Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/.
References
Noyori, R. (ed.). Asymmetric Catalysts in Organic Synthesis (Wiley-VCH, 1994).
Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A. & Yamamoto, H. (eds) Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis Vol. I–I. I. I. (Springer, 1999).
Cherney, A. H., Kadunce, N. T. & Reisman, S. E. Enantioselective and enantiospecific transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organometallic reagents to construct C–C bonds. Chem. Rev. 115, 9587–9652 (2015).
Colobert, F. & Wencel-Delord, J. (eds.) C–H Activation for Asymmetric Synthesis (Wiley-VCH, 2019).
Giri, R., Shi, B.-F., Engle, K. M., Maugel, N. & Yu, J.-Q. Transition metal-catalyzed C–H activation reactions: diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 3242–3272 (2009).
Newton, C. G., Wang, S.-G., Oliveira, C. C. & Cramer, N. Catalytic enantioselective transformations involving C−H bond cleavage by transition-metal complexes. Chem. Rev. 117, 8908–8976 (2017).
Saint-Deni, T. G. et al. Enantioselective C(sp3)–H bond activation by chiral transition metal catalysts. Science 359, eaao4798 (2018).
Liao, G., Zhang, T., Lin, Z.-K. & Shi, B.-F. Transition metal-catalyzed enantioselective C−H functionalization via chiral transient directing group strategies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19773–19786 (2020).
Woźniak, Ł. et al. Catalytic enantioselective functionalizations of C−H bonds by chiral iridium complexes. Chem. Rev. 120, 10516–10543 (2020).
Yoshino, T., Satake, S. & Matsunaga, S. Diverse approaches for enantioselective C−H functionalization reactions using Group 9 CpxMIII catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 7346–7357 (2020).
Loup, J., Dhawa, U., Pesciaioli, F., Wencel-Delord, J. & Ackermann, L. Enantioselective C–H activation with earth-abundant 3d transition metals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 12803–12818 (2019).
Woźniak, Ł. & Cramer, N. Enantioselective C–H bond functionalizations by 3d transition-metal catalysts. Trends Chem. 1, 471–484 (2019).
Cera, G., Haven, T. & Ackermann, L. Expedient iron-catalyzed C–H allylation/alkylation by triazole assistance with ample scope. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1484–1488 (2016).
Schmiel, D. & Butenschön, H. Directed iron-catalyzed ortho-alkylation and arylation: toward the stereoselective catalytic synthesis of 1,2-disubstituted planar-chiral ferrocene derivatives. Organometallics 36, 4979–4989 (2017).
Loup, J. et al. Asymmetric iron-catalyzed C–H alkylation enabled by remote ligand meta-substitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 14197–14201 (2017).
Morgan, J. W. & Anders, E. Chemical composition of Earth, Venus, and Mercury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 6973–6977 (1980).
Bolm, C., Legros, J., Le Paih, J. & Zani, L. Iron-catalyzed reactions in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 104, 6217–6254 (2004).
Plietker, B. (eds.). Iron Catalysis in Organic Chemistry (Wiley-VCH, 2008).
Bauer, I. & Knölker, H.-J. Iron catalysis in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 115, 3170–3387 (2015).
Fürstner, A. Iron catalysis in organic synthesis: A critical assessment of what it takes to make this base metal a multitasking champion. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 778–789 (2016).
Jin, M., Adak, L. & Nakamura, M. Iron-catalyzed enantioselective cross-coupling reactions of α-chloroesters with aryl Grignard reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7128–7134 (2015).
Iwamoto, T., Okuzono, C., Adak, L., Jin, M. & Nakamura, M. Iron-catalysed enantioselective Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of racemic alkyl bromides. Chem. Commun. 55, 1128–1131 (2019).
Tyrol, C. C., Yone, N. S., Gallin, C. F. & Byers, J. A. Iron-catalysed enantioconvergent Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling to afford enantioenriched 1,1-diarylalkanes. Chem. Commun. 56, 14661–14664 (2020).
Surgenor, R. R., Liu, X., Keenlyside, M. J. H., Myers, W. & Smith, M. D. Enantioselective synthesis of atropisomeric indoles via iron-catalysed oxidative cross-coupling. Nat. Chem. 15, 357–365 (2023).
Pellissier, H. Recent developments in enantioselective iron-catalyzed transformations. Coord. Chem. Rev. 386, 1–31 (2019).
Casnati, A., Lanzi, M. & Cera, G. Recent advances in asymmetric iron catalysis. Molecules 25, 3889 (2020).
Sears, J. D., Neate, P. G. N. & Neidig, M. L. Intermediates and mechanism in iron-catalyzed cross-coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11872–11883 (2018).
Sun, C.-L., Li, B.-J. & Shi, Z.-J. Direct C–H transformation via iron catalysis. Chem. Rev. 111, 1293–1314 (2011).
Cera, G. & Ackermann, L. Iron-catalyzed C–H functionalization processes. Top. Curr. Chem. 374, 57 (2016).
Shang, R., Ilies, L. & Nakamura, E. Iron-catalyzed C–H bond activation. Chem. Rev. 117, 9086–9139 (2017).
Wong, M. Y., Yamakawa, T. & Yoshikai, N. Iron-catalyzed directed C2-alkylation and alkenylation of indole with vinylarenes and alkynes. Org. Lett. 17, 442–445 (2015).
Hopkinson, M. N., Richter, C., Schedler, M. & Glorius, F. An overview of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Nature 510, 485–496 (2014).
Ge, Y., Huang, X., Ke, J. & He, C. Transition-metal-catalyzed enantioselective C−H silylation. Chem. Catal. 2, 2898–2928 (2022).
Qian, P.-F., Li, J.-Y., Zhou, T. & Shi, B.-F. Synthesis of P- and S-stereogenic compounds via enantioselective C–H functionalization. Synthesis 54, 4784–4794 (2022).
Wencel-Delord, J., Panossian, A., Leroux, F. R. & Colobert, F. Recent advances and new concepts for the synthesis of axially stereoenriched biaryls. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 3418–3430 (2015).
Liao, G., Zhou, T., Yao, Q.-J. & Shi, B.-F. Recent advances in the synthesis of axially chiral biaryls via transition metal-catalyzed asymmetric C–H functionalization. Chem. Commun. 55, 8514–8523 (2019).
Liu, C.-X., Zhang, W.-W., Yin, S.-Y., Gu, Q. & You, S.-L. Synthesis of atropisomers by transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric C–H functionalization reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 14025–14040 (2021).
Cheng, J. K., Xiang, S.-H., Li, S., Ye, L. & Tan, B. Recent advances in catalytic asymmetric construction of atropisomers. Chem. Rev. 121, 4805–4902 (2021).
Rodríguez-Salamanca, P., Fernández, R., Hornillos, V. & Lassaletta, J. M. Asymmetric synthesis of axially chiral C–N atropisomers. Chem. Eur. J. 28, e202104442 (2022).
Wu, Y.-J., Liao, G. & Shi, B.-F. Stereoselective construction of atropisomers featuring a C–N chiral axis. Green. Synth. Catal. 3, 117–136 (2022).
LaPlante, S. R. et al. Assessing atropisomer axial chirality in drug discovery and development. J. Med. Chem. 54, 7005–7022 (2011).
Bringmann, G. et al. Murrastifoline-F: first total synthesis, atropo-enantiomer resolution, and stereoanalysis of an axially chiral N,C-coupled biaryl alkaloid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 2703–2711 (2001).
Wang, J. et al. Discovery and assessment of atropisomers of (±)-Lesinurad. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 299–303 (2017).
Selness, S. R. et al. Discovery of PH-797804, a highly selective and potent inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21, 4066–4071 (2011).
Zhang, J., Xu, Q., Wu, J., Fan, J. & Xie, M. Construction of N‒C axial chirality through atroposelective C‒H olefination of N-arylindoles by palladium/amino acid cooperative catalysis. Org. Lett. 21, 6361–6365 (2019).
Zhang, S. et al. Enantioselective synthesis of atropisomers featuring pentatomic heteroaromatics by Pd-catalyzed C‒H alkynylation. ACS Catal. 9, 1956–1961 (2019).
Yao, Q.-J. et al. Enantioselective synthesis of atropisomeric anilides via Pd(II)-catalyzed asymmetric C‒H olefination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 18266–18276 (2020).
Wu, Y.-J. et al. Atroposelective synthesis of N-aryl peptoid atropisomers via a palladium(II)-catalyzed asymmetric C–H alkynylation strategy. Chem. Sci. 12, 9391–9397 (2021).
Dhawa, U. et al. Enantioselective palladaelectro-catalyzed C–H olefinations and allylations for N–C axial chirality. Chem. Sci. 12, 14182–14188 (2021).
Frey, J., Hou, X. & Ackermann, L. Atropoenantioselective palladaelectro-catalyzed anilide C–H olefinations viable with natural sunlight as sustainable power source. Chem. Sci. 13, 2729–2734 (2022).
Li, H. et al. Enantioselective synthesis of C‒N axially chiral N-aryloxindoles by asymmetric Rhodium-catalyzed dual C‒H activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 6732–6736 (2019).
Sun, L. et al. Rhodium-catalyzed atroposelective construction of indoles via C–H bond activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 8391–8395 (2021).
Carmona, J. A. et al. Dynamic kinetic asymmetric heck reaction for the simultaneous generation of central and axial chirality. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11067–11075 (2018).
Romero-Arenas, A. et al. Ir-catalyzed atroposelective desymmetrization of heterobiaryls: hydroarylation of vinyl ethers and bicycloalkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2628–2639 (2020).
Wang, F. et al. Rhodium-catalyzed C−H activation-based construction of axially and centrally chiral indenes through two discrete insertions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 16628–16633 (2021).
Wang, J. et al. Enantioselective and diastereoselective C–H alkylation of benzamides: synergized axial and central chirality via a single stereodetermining step. ACS Catal. 11, 9151–9158 (2021).
Li, Y., Liou, Y.-C., Oliveira, J. C. A. & Ackermann, L. Ruthenium(II)/imidazolidine carboxylic acid-catalyzed C−H alkylation for central and axial double enantio induction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202212595 (2022).
Zhang, Z.-J. et al. Data-driven design of new chiral carboxylic acid for construction of indoles with C-central and C–N axial chirality via cobalt catalysis. Nat. Commun. 14, 3149 (2023).
Jacob, N., Zaid, Y., Oliveira, J. C. A., Ackermann, L. & Wencel-Delord, J. Cobalt-catalyzed enantioselective C–H arylation of indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 798–806 (2022).
Luc, A. & Wencel-Delord, J. One reaction – double stereoinduction: C–H activation as a privileged route towards complex atropisomeric molecules. Chem. Commun. 59, 8159–8167 (2023).
Neate, P. G. N., Greenhalgh, M. D., Brennessel, W. W., Thomas, S. P. & Neidig, M. L. TMEDA in iron-catalyzed hydromagnesiation: formation of iron(II)-alkyl species for controlled reduction to alkene-stabilized iron(0). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 17070–17076 (2020).
Chen, W. et al. Formal Co(0), Fe(0), and Mn(0) complexes with NHC and styrene ligation. Chin. Chem. Lett. 31, 1342–1344 (2020).
Wolford, N. J., Muñoz III, S. B., Neate, P. G. N., Brennessel, W. W. & Neidig, M. L. NHC effects on reduction dynamics in iron-catalyzed organic transformations. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 13651–13658 (2021).
Computations were performed with the Gaussian 16 software package, Revision A. 03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT (2016); computational details are included in the Supplementary Information.
Lefebvre, C. et al. Accurately extracting the signature of intermolecular interactions present in the NCI plot of the reduced density gradient versus electron density. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 17928–17936 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the DFG (Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz award and SPP1807 to L. A.), the Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation (fellowship to Z.-J. Z.), the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 895404 (fellowship to A. M. M.), the DAAD (fellowship to B. B. J.) and the National Science Foundation (CHE-1954480 to M. L. N.). J.W.-D. thanks the CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), the “Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale et de la Recherche” (France) for financial support. J.W.-D., and L.A. acknowledge ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) and the DFG. The authors thank Dr. Christopher Golz (University of Göttingen) and Dr. William Brennessel (University of Rochester) for assistance with the X-ray diffraction analysis.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L. A., J. W.-D., M. L. N., Z.-J. Z. and N. J. conceived the project. Z.-J. Z. and N. J. designed the experiments and analyzed the data. Z.-J. Z., N. J., P. B. and B. B. J. performed the experiments. Z.-J. Z., S. B., P. B., J. C. D. and A. M. M. contributed to the mechanistic studies. X. C., J. C. A. O. and A. R. performed the computational studies. All the authors participated in the discussion and preparation of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Felix Plasser, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, ZJ., Jacob, N., Bhatia, S. et al. Iron-catalyzed stereoselective C–H alkylation for simultaneous construction of C–N axial and C-central chirality. Nat Commun 15, 3503 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47589-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47589-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.