Abstract
Topological materials with boundary (surface/edge/hinge) states have attracted tremendous research interest. Additionally, unconventional (obstructed atomic) materials have recently drawn lots of attention owing to their obstructed boundary states. Experimentally, Josephson junctions (JJs) constructed on materials with boundary states produce the peculiar boundary supercurrent, which was utilized as a powerful diagnostic approach. Here, we report the observations of boundary supercurrent in NiTe2-based JJs. Particularly, applying an in-plane magnetic field along the Josephson current can rapidly suppress the bulk supercurrent and retain the nearly pure boundary supercurrent, namely the magnetic field filtering of supercurrent. Further systematic comparative analysis and theoretical calculations demonstrate the existence of unconventional nature and obstructed hinge states in NiTe2, which could produce hinge supercurrent that accounts for the observation. Our results reveal the probable hinge states in unconventional metal NiTe2, and demonstrate in-plane magnetic field as an efficient method to filter out the bulk contributions and thereby to highlight the hinge states hidden in topological/unconventional materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bulk band topology permeates in three- and two-dimensional (3D and 2D) condensed matter, e.g., topological insulators and topological semimetals, and gives rise to gapless surface/edge states. These states result from the well-known bulk-boundary correspondence and are topologically protected1,2,3. In recent years, the concept has been extended to d-dimensional higher-order topological systems with (d-m)-dimensional (m\(\ge\)2) metallic hinge or corner states4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Josephson junctions (JJs)11 have served as a powerful tool to reveal boundary states in topological materials12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 as well as non-topological materials21,22,23, where supercurrent distributions modulated by the boundary supercurrent could be discriminated by measuring the interference pattern of the critical supercurrent in a magnetic field.
On the other hand, a new category of unconventional materials (being of obstructed atomic limit) has been proposed with the unconventional nature, where the electrons are located away from the nuclei in crystals24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31. As a result of the mismatch between average electronic centers and atomic positions, the obstructed hinge/edge states emerge on the boundary, whose bulk band gaps could be much larger than those of topological materials. In general, both the topological and obstructed boundary states can be used for constructing topological superconductivity and Majorana zero modes with the assistance of superconducting proximity effect (SPE)31,32,33,34,35. However, in principle it is a challenge to distinguish the boundary states hidden in a semimetal/metal from bulk states, because both of them are metallic. But for their JJs, the supercurrent on bulk states is expected to suffer larger decoherence and dephasing effects than the boundary states, and therefore, the JJs would exhibit a particular behavior based on the boundary supercurrent channels12,13,14,15,16,17.
In this work, we report the observations of the boundary supercurrent in unconventional metal NiTe2-based JJs. Particularly, an in-plane magnetic field (only few tens of millitesla) applied parallel to the Josephson current could filter out the bulk supercurrent and retain the robust boundary supercurrent. Based on a further comparison with a JJ which did not include the hinges of the sample, the effect of an in-plane magnetic field perpendicular/parallel to the Josephson current, and theoretical calculations, these observations could be attributed to obstructed hinge states in the unconventional metal NiTe2. Especially, the magnetic field filtering of the supercurrent functions as a compelling route to acquire the nearly pure boundary supercurrent in topological/unconventional materials-based JJs.
Results
NiTe2-based JJ
NiTe2 crystallizes in the CdI2-type trigonal structure with a P\(\bar{3}\)m1 space group (number 164), as schematically illustrated by the left inset of Fig. 1a. The NiTe2 layers individually stack along the c-axis (C3 rotation axis) via van der Waals (vdW) force. It was reported as a type-II Dirac material by ab initio calculations and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy measurements36,37. Exfoliated NiTe2 nanoplates with a thickness more than 30 nm were used in this work. Figure 1a shows the temperature dependence of the resistance (R) for a NiTe2 nanoplate from room temperature to 1.55 K with a typical metallic behavior. Note that NiTe2 is not superconducting down to 30 mK38. Since device D1 shown below was measured around 70 mK, our observations should not be caused by intrinsic superconductivity in NiTe2. The magnetic field dependence of R suggests a nearly non-saturating linear or sublinear magnetoresistance as shown by the right inset of Fig. 1a, which is similar to the bulk materials36,39.
We fabricated JJs on NiTe2 nanoplates with superconducting electrodes NbTiN as shown in Fig. 1b. JJs of this type have been successfully implemented on many topological materials14,15,40,41,42,43,44,45, including the exploration of the boundary states. The current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of device D1 is shown in Fig. 1c, indicating a Josephson critical supercurrent (Ic) of ~1 μA. When a magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the junction (Bz), the superconducting interference pattern (SIP) could be obtained as illustrated in Fig. 2a. The SIP is characterized by the periodic oscillations of Ic as marked by the whitish envelope which separates the superconducting and normal states. We note that the Ic decays very slowly with increasing \(\left|{B}_{{{{{{\rm{z}}}}}}}\right|\), which is in stark contrast to the standard one-slit Fraunhofer-like pattern with the form \(\left|\sin \left(\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_{0}\right)/\left(\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_{0}\right)\right|\) in conventional JJs, denoted by the red line in Fig. 2a, where \(\Phi={L}_{{eff}}W{B}_{z}\) is the magnetic flux, \({L}_{{eff}}\) and \(W\) are the effective length and width of the junction, respectively, and \({\Phi }_{0}\) = h/2e is the flux quantum (h is the Planck constant, e is the elementary charge)11. A similar phenomenon has been reported on various materials which was attributed to the large boundary (edge or hinge) supercurrent density in the JJs14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. As for JJs, the supercurrent density Js as a function of position y, Js(y), can be extracted from the Bz dependence of Ic, Ic(Bz), through the Fourier transform (Dynes-Fulton approach)46. Figure 2b depicts the supercurrent density profile Js(y) extracted from the Ic(Bz) curves, retrieved from Fig. 2a accordingly (see Supplementary Section I). The center of the junction corresponds to the position y = 0. Note that large supercurrent densities appear around y = \(\pm\)0.7 μm, which locate at the hinges or side surfaces of the sample and give rise to the boundary supercurrent. Therefore, the SIP on D1 is constituted by the bulk and hinge/side-surface supercurrent. In the following, boundary refers to the hinges or side surfaces of the NiTe2 nanoplate.
Effect of an in-plane magnetic field
We next investigate the effect of an in-plane magnetic field on the SIP. Figure 2c, d shows the SIPs under Bx = 0.1 T and 0.2 T, respectively. Note that the x-axis of the 2D color plots has been corrected to eliminate the Bz component induced by Bx, y (see Supplementary Section II). Here, Bx denotes the in-plane magnetic field parallel to the Josephson current, while By is perpendicular to the Josephson current. The width of the central lobe decreases when increasing Bx, as indicated by the red dashed line. Notably, the relative height of the central lobe to the side lobes is strongly suppressed at Bx = 0.2 T, indicating a boundary-dominant supercurrent. As sketched in Fig. 2e, when the bulk supercurrent is dominant, it presents a standard Fraunhofer-like pattern with the central lobe possessing a width of 2\({\Phi }_{0}\) and the side lobe of \({\Phi }_{0}\). In particular, the height of the lobes shows a global 1/\(\left|{B}_{z}\right|\) fast decay (top row). On the contrary, when the supercurrent flows only along the two hinges/side surfaces (bottom row), the single JJ imitates a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) with a two-slit SIP which follows the form \(\left|\cos \left(\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_{0}\right)\right|\). In this case, both the central and side lobes have a uniform width of \({\Phi }_{0}\) and a weak global decay. If considering the admixture of bulk and boundary supercurrent, the SIP has a finite weight of SQUID signal (middle row), which exactly corresponds to the SIP on our NiTe2-based JJ D1 at Bx = 0 T. Accordingly, as shown in Fig. 2d, with the increase of Bx the contribution from the bulk supercurrent decreases significantly and finally a SQUID-like pattern emerges with the boundary-dominant supercurrent. Therefore, the in-plane magnetic field Bx could filter out the bulk supercurrent, i.e., the magnetic field filtering of supercurrent is observed in our experiments.
Such filter effect is crucial for inspecting the contribution from the boundary supercurrent in JJs, even if the weight of the boundary supercurrent is not large enough. Figures 3a, c depict the SIPs for devices D2-1 and D3-1 with different weights of the boundary supercurrent without in-plane magnetic fields. Here, D2-1 displays the deviation from the standard Fraunhofer-like pattern (red line) mainly on the first and second side lobes, while D3-1 shows a very little deviation. The supercurrent density profiles of Fig. 3a, b shown in the right insets indicate the small weight of the boundary supercurrent. However, an in-plane magnetic field Bx = 0.04 T entirely kills the bulk supercurrent and yields SQUID-like patterns as shown in Fig. 3b, c (Bx for killing the bulk supercurrent is device dependent; see Supplementary Section III). In the same way, the supercurrent density profiles in the insets of Fig. 3b, c illustrate the dominance of the boundary supercurrent.
We further compared the effect between Bx and By on D4-1 and realized that By has a negligible filter effect on the bulk supercurrent. Without the in-plane magnetic field, D4-1 exhibits a SIP with a bulk-dominant supercurrent, as plotted in Fig. 4a. Applying Bx = 0.04 T is successful in presenting the SQUID-like pattern as shown in Fig. 4b, as expected. However, the SQUID-like pattern is always absent for By = 0.04 T, 0.06 T and 0.2 T, as shown in Fig. 4c–e, respectively (The different critical magnetic field of the bulk supercurrent between Bx and By is discussed in Supplementary Section IV).
Origin of the boundary supercurrent
Regarding to the origin of the observed boundary supercurrent, it is commonly attributed to the proximity-induced superconductivity on hinge/side-surface channels12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. However, the bending of the magnetic field lines around the edges of the electrodes was also proposed47. In order to further clarify the essential role of the sample hinges/side surfaces, we fabricated a JJ whose junction region did not include the hinges/side surfaces of the sample, as shown by the left inset of Fig. 5a (device D2-2; the upper left junction of D2 shown in the inset of Fig. 3a). The SIP only presents a central lobe as depicted in Fig. 5a, which is merely possible for the Fraunhofer case and could be attributed to the supercurrent extending towards the outside of the junction area due to the superconducting proximity effect. The current density is not uniform as shown by the right inset of Fig. 5a, and thus the SIP is distorted from the standard Fraunhofer pattern and side lobes can be hardly observed. Consistently, the SIP does not show any SQUID-like signal even if applying a magnetic field Bx = 0.05 T, as displayed in Fig. 5b (The width of central lobe is smaller than Fig. 5a, primarily due to the large suppression of supercurrent at Bx = 0.05 T, which can also be seen in Fig. 4e at By = 0.2 T). It would be a critical evidence to pin down the role of the sample hinges/side surfaces for the boundary supercurrent in our JJs.
The hinge states
A clue of the boundary supercurrent may be found by comparing the assumption of side surfaces and the experimental data (Supplementary Section IV). The measured critical boundary supercurrent at finite By is much larger than the calculated values if assuming a side-surface supercurrent that follows the ideal Fraunhofer pattern. Diverse mechanisms could induce deviations, though, it indicates the possibility of hinge supercurrent.
In order to further clarify the origin of boundary supercurrent in NiTe2-based JJs, we next investigate the hinge states in NiTe2 by Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. Comparing with the hinge supercurrent originating from the higher-order topology in Cd3As2 and WTe2-based JJs14,15,16,17, it is intriguing to scrutinize the topological hinge states in NiTe2. However, the type-II Dirac point in NiTe2 is embedded in the bulk bands, and there is no clue yet that it could present topological hinge states.
Instead, our detailed DFT calculations show that NiTe2 has the unconventional nature of charge mismatch, which gives rise to the obstructed hinge states. Meanwhile, the locked spin of the hinge states could explain the observed magnetic field filtering effect of the boundary supercurrent (as shown later). We calculated the NiTe2 rod and obtained the projected spectrum on the hinge atoms shown in the inset of Fig. 6f. To simulate the properties of the NiTe2 monolayer, we slightly enlarged the interlayer distance (only modifying Te-pz dispersion) and computed the orbital-resolved band structures (Fig. 6a–c) and Wannier charge centers for the lower nine “occupied” bands (Fig. 6d). The results show that the Te-px, py and Ni-d orbitals have a strong hybridization. The Te2- valence state usually means that the Te-p orbitals are fully occupied. Surprisingly, there is a large weight of Te-px/py orbitals in the conduction bands, which contradicts with the Te2- valence state. On the other hand, using z-directed 1D Wilson loop technique, Wannier charge centers (WCC) are obtained (Fig. 6d), and the two average charge centers in the red box are quite away from the Te atoms (the dashed lines), indicating the unconventional nature of NiTe2 monolayer, which has no symmetry eigenvalue indication31. Then, when we performed the calculation in an open boundary condition, the obstructed states were obtained on the edge (Fig. 6e) (red and blue bands indicate the different spin channels due to spin-orbit interactions). To investigate the side surface and hinge states of the bulk NiTe2, we have performed a rod calculation with open boundary conditions in both b and c directions. The results in Fig. 6f show the hinge states of the pristine NiTe2 structure clearly by the projections on the hinge atoms in the red box of Fig. 6g, while the side-surface states are much weaker than the hinge states due to the interlayer hybridization (see Fig. S7 in the Supplementary Section VI). Thus, we demonstrated that the hinge states are regarded as the remnants of the obstructed states of the unconventional metal NiTe228,31. Intriguingly, such unconventional materials were also found to be suitable to construct Josephson diode27,28,48.
Then, we consider the symmetries on the hinges (in x direction): mirror symmetry (Mx) and time reversal (T). The Mx makes the spin orientation of hinge states satisfy \({\sigma }_{{{{{{\rm{x}}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}})={\sigma }_{{{{{{\rm{x}}}}}}}(-{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}})\), while T makes \({\sigma }_{{{{{{\rm{x}}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}})=-{\sigma }_{{{{{{\rm{x}}}}}}}(-{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}})\). Thus, the combined symmetry TMx yields \({\sigma }_{{{{{{\rm{x}}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}})=0\) for the non-degenerate hinge states. In other words, due to the co-existence of Mx and T, the electron spins of the hinge states are locked to be in the plane perpendicular to the hinges, as illustrated in Fig. 6h. The spin orientation of the non-degenerate hinge states aligns well with the filter effect of the supercurrent under Bx, as explained below.
In the case of planar Josephson junctions, when the magnetic field is parallel to the current, the Fraunhofer-like decay of the supercurrent is absent. Considering the small thickness of NiTe2 plates, orbital pair-breaking effect is relatively weak at such small magnetic fields. Therefore, the Zeeman effect should dominate the suppression of the supercurrent. Consequently, the locked spin protects the Cooper pairs of the hinge states from undergoing depairing in Bx. In contrary, the spins of the bulk states are randomized without such protection. The coupling between spins and Bx (Zeeman energy) for the bulk is much larger than that for the hinges, and therefore the Cooper pairs of the bulk are easier to break. A similar mechanism has been previously discussed in Ising superconductors to explain the giant upper critical field49,50,51. Due to the spin-orbit-coupling locked spin perpendicular to the MoS2 film, an in-plane upper critical field much larger than the Pauli limit was observed.
Regarding By, the acquired Zeeman energy to break Cooper pairs for the spins of the hinges is almost the same as that for the bulk. Hence, the Cooper pairs are not protected by the spin-momentum locking. Therefore, the magnetic field filtering of supercurrent is absent for By. (Our main train of thought on the hinge states and the filtering effect is shown in Supplementary Section IX.) Recently, modulation of supercurrent induced by the in-plane magnetic field was also observed in graphene systems, which could also be conceptualized as a form of magnetic filtering of supercurrent52,53.
Next, we discuss the possible mechanisms for the fast suppression of the bulk supercurrent and the anisotropic rate for Bx and By (see a more detailed discussion in Supplementary Section III). (1) The fast suppression could be contributed to the Gaussian-like decay of the bulk supercurrent due to orbital spin-flip54. However, the anisotropic rate requires an anisotropic diffusion constant (D) in NiTe2, which is unknown, suggesting inapplicability. (2) The in-plane magnetic field can lead to Zeeman splitting, resulting in an exponentially suppressed critical current52. Again, an anisotropic D is required. (3) A likely mechanism is related to spin-orbital suppression, a manifestation of the interplay between in-plane magnetic field and spin-orbital coupling, and the anisotropy mainly comes from the difference between Bx and By on the flux penetration43. This mechanism could indeed effectively account for both our observed anisotropic in-plane suppression behavior and the remarkably low critical in-plane field along Bx. (4) It might also come from the vimineous shape of the electrodes that exhibit anisotropic demagnetization55,56,57. Note that this mechanism was usually applied to intrinsic superconductors, while in our case it is proximity-induced JJ.
In conclusion, we uncovered the probable hinge supercurrent in NiTe2-based JJs. Our observations combined with the theoretical calculations revealed the unconventional nature and hinge states in NiTe2. In particular, we demonstrated the in-plane magnetic field filtering as a route of vital importance to eliminate unserviceable contributions from bulk states in topological/unconventional materials with hinge states.
Methods
Crystal growth and device fabrication
High-quality NiTe2 single crystals were synthesized using the Te flux method. High purity Ni powder (99.9%) and Te ingots (99.99%) with a ratio of 1:10 were sealed in an evacuated quartz tube. Then, the sealed quartz tube was placed in a furnace, and heated to 1000 °C over 10 h. After staying at a constant temperature of 1000 °C for 10 h, the tube was cooled to 600 °C in a rate of 3 °C\(/{{{{{\rm{h}}}}}}\) and kept at 600 °C for 3 days to improve the quality of the single crystals. Finally, single crystals of NiTe2 were obtained by removing the remaining Te flux at 600 °C. NiTe2 nanoplates were exfoliated from the single crystals onto a Si/SiO2 wafer in air atmosphere. Ti/NbTiN (5 nm/100 nm) electrodes were deposited via magnetron sputtering with a preceding soft plasma cleaning, using standard electron-beam lithography techniques.
Transport measurements
Measurements of the temperature and magnetic field dependence of the resistance of NiTe2 nanoplates were carried out with a four-probe configuration in an Oxford TeslatronPT system equipped with a 14 T superconducting magnet. The measurements of Josephson junctions were carried out with a quasi-four-probe configuration in cryofree Oxford Triton dilution refrigerators equipped with a 3-axis vector magnet. A source meter (Keithley 2612B) was used to apply a d.c. bias current Idc. A lock-in amplifier (LI5640, NF Corporation) was used to apply a small a.c. excitation current Iac and obtain the differential resistance dV/dI = Vac/Iac.
Theoretical calculation
We performed the first-principles calculations within the framework of the density functional theory (DFT) using projector augmented wave (PAW) method58,59 implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)60,61. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) type62 was employed for the exchange-correlation potential. The kinetic energy cutoff for plane wave expansion was set to 400 eV. The thickness of the vacuum layers along b and c directions for the NiTe2 ribbon with open boundary conditions were set to > 20 Å. The Brillouin zone was sampled by Γ-centered Monkhorst-Pack method in the self-consistent process, with a 9 × 9 × 6 k-mesh for NiTe2 bulk and a 12 × 1 × 1 k-mesh for the NiTe2 ribbon.
Data availability
The data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided in this paper.
Code availability
The computer code used for DFT calculations is available from Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/10694115).
References
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulator. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).
Bansil, A., Lin, H. & Das, T. Colloquium: Topological band theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016).
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Quantized electric multipole insulators. Science 357, 61–66 (2017).
Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017).
Song, Z., Fang, Z. & Fang, C. (d−2)-dimensional edge states of rotation symmetry protected topological states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246402 (2017).
Trifunovic, L. & Brouwer, P. W. Higher-order bulk-boundary correspondence for topological crystalline phases. Phys. Rev. X 9, 011012 (2019).
Wieder, B. J. et al. Strong and fragile topological Dirac semimetals with higher-order Fermi arcs. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–13 (2020).
Calugaru, D., Juricic, V. & Roy, B. Higher-order topological phases: a general principle of construction. Phys. Rev. B 99, 041301 (2019).
Xie, B. et al. Higher-order band topology. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 520–532 (2021).
Barone, A. & Paterno, G. Physics and applications of the Josephson effect. Vol. 1 p69–p95 (Wiley Online Library, 1982).
Wang, Y., Lee, G.-H. & Ali, M. N. Topology and superconductivity on the edge. Nat. Phys. 17, 542–546 (2021).
Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topology in bismuth. Nat. Phys. 14, 918–924 (2018).
Li, C.-Z. et al. Reducing electronic transport dimension to topological hinge states by increasing geometry size of Dirac semimetal Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 156601 (2020).
Choi, Y.-B. et al. Evidence of higher-order topology in multilayer WTe2 from Josephson coupling through anisotropic hinge states. Nat. Mater. 19, 974–979 (2020).
Huang, C. et al. Edge superconductivity in multilayer WTe2 Josephson junction. Nat. Sci. Rev. 7, 1468–1475 (2020).
Kononov, A. et al. One-dimensional edge transport in few-layer WTe2. Nano Lett. 20, 4228–4233 (2020).
Wang, W. et al. Evidence for an edge supercurrent in the Weyl superconductor MoTe2. Science 368, 534–537 (2020).
Hart, S. et al. Induced superconductivity in the quantum spin Hall edge. Nat. Phys. 10, 638–643 (2014).
Pribiag, V. S. et al. Edge-mode superconductivity in a two-dimensional topological insulator. Nat. Nano. 10, 593–597 (2015).
Allen, M. T. et al. Spatially resolved edge currents and guided-wave electronic states in graphene. Nat. Phys. 12, 128–133 (2016).
Ying, J. et al. Magnitude and spatial distribution control of the supercurrent in Bi2O2Se-based Josephson junction. Nano Lett. 20, 2569–2575 (2020).
Zhu, M. et al. Edge currents shunt the insulating bulk in gapped graphene. Nat. Commun. 8, 14552 (2017).
Bradlyn, B. et al. Topological quantum chemistry. Nature 547, 298–305 (2017).
Vergniory, M. G. et al. A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials. Nature 566, 480–485 (2019).
Xu, Y. et al. Filling-enforced obstructed atomic insulators. arXiv: 2106.10276, (2021).
Xu, Y. et al. Three-dimensional real space invariants, obstructed atomic insulators and a new principle for active catalytic sites. arXiv: 2111.02433, (2021).
Gao, J. et al. Unconventional materials: the mismatch between electronic charge centers and atomic positions. Sci. Bull. 67, 598–608 (2022).
Jiang, K., Weng, H. & Hu, J. The destiny of obstructed atomic insulator under correlation. Phys. Rev. B 108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.195102 (2023).
Zhang, R. et al. Large shift current, π Zak phase, and the unconventional nature of Se and Te. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023142 (2023).
Sheng, H. et al. Symmetry indicator-free unconventionality, obstructed edge states and Majorana engineering in 1T-PtSe2 family. arXiv:2308.12055, (2023).
Hsu, C.-H., Stano, P., Klinovaja, J. & Loss, D. Majorana Kramers pairs in higher-order topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 196801 (2018).
Langbehn, J., Peng, Y., Trifunovic, L., von Oppen, F. & Brouwer, P. W. Reflection-symmetric second-order topological insulators and superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017).
Pan, X.-H. et al. Lattice-symmetry-assisted second-order topological superconductors and Majorana patterns. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 156801 (2019).
Jack, B. et al. Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel. Science 364, 1255–1259 (2019).
Xu, C. et al. Topological type-II Dirac fermions approaching the Fermi level in a transition metal dichalcogenide NiTe2. Chem. Mater. 30, 4823–4830 (2018).
Ghosh, B. et al. Observation of bulk states and spin-polarized topological surface states in transition metal dichalcogenide Dirac semimetal candidate NiTe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 195134 (2019).
Esin, V. D., Shvetsov, O. O., Timonina, A. V., Kolesnikov, N. N. & Deviatov, E. V. Interface superconductivity in a Dirac semimetal NiTe2. Nanomaterials 12, 4114 (2022).
Zheng, W. et al. Bulk Fermi surfaces of the Dirac type-II semimetallic candidate NiTe2. Phys. Rev. B 102, 125103 (2020).
Qu, F. et al. Strong superconducting proximity effect in Pb-Bi2Te3 hybrid structures. Sci. Rep. 2, 1–5 (2012).
Li, C.-Z. et al. Fermi-arc supercurrent oscillations in Dirac semimetal Josephson junctions. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–7 (2020).
Li, C. et al. 4p-periodic Andreev bound states in a Dirac semimetal. Nat. Mater. 17, 875–880 (2018).
Hart, S. et al. Controlled finite momentum pairing and spatially varying order parameter in proximitized HgTe quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 13, 87–93 (2017).
Chen, A. Q. et al. Finite momentum Cooper pairing in three-dimensional topological insulator Josephson junctions. Nat. Commun. 9, 3478 (2018).
Pal, B. et al. Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal. Nat. Phys. 18, 1228–1233 (2022).
Dynes, R. C. & Fulton, T. A. Supercurrent density distribution in Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. B 3, 3015 (1971).
Suominen, H. J. et al. Anomalous Fraunhofer interference in epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035307 (2017).
Wu, H. et al. The field-free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostructure. Nature 604, 653–656 (2022).
Lu, J. M. et al. Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2. Science 350, 1353–1357 (2015).
Saito, Y. et al. Superconductivity protected by spin–valley locking in ion-gated MoS2. Nat. Phys. 12, 144–149 (2016).
Xi, X. et al. Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe2 atomic layers. Nat. Phys. 12, 139–143 (2016).
Dvir, T. et al. Planar graphene-NbSe2 Josephson junctions in a parallel magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 103, 115401 (2021).
Zalic, A., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Gazit, S. & Steinberg, H. J. N. L. High magnetic field stability in a planar graphene-NbSe2 SQUID. Nano Lett. 23, 6102–6108 (2023).
Hammer, J., Cuevas, J. C., Bergeret, F. & Belzig, W. Density of states and supercurrent in diffusive SNS junctions: roles of nonideal interfaces and spin-flip scattering. Phys. Rev. B 76, 064514 (2007).
Baumgartner, C. et al. Supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions. Nat. Nano. 17, 39–44 (2022).
Mi, X. et al. Relevance of sample geometry on the in-plane anisotropy of SrxBi2Se3 superconductor. arXiv: 2110.14447, (2021).
Prozorov, R. & Kogan, V. G. Effective demagnetizing factors of diamagnetic samples of various shapes. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 014030 (2018).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Yi Zhou for the fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1403400, 2022YFA1403800, 2021YFE0194200, 2020YFA0309200, 2017YFA0304700); by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12074417, 92065203, 92365207, 11974395, 12188101, 12104489, and 11527806); by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB28000000, and XDB33000000); by the Synergetic Extreme Condition User Facility sponsored by the National Development and Reform Commission; and by the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (2021ZD0302600); and by the Center for Materials Genome.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.Q. supervised the project. C.L. synthesized the crystals under the instruction of F.L. T.L., R.J. and L.T. fabricated the devices and performed the transport measurements, with the support from X.C., Z.L., J.S., G.L., L.L. and F.Q. T.L. and F.Q. analysed the data with the help from Z.W. and L.L. R.Z., H.S. and Z.W. did the DFT calculations and symmetry analysis. T.L., F.Q., Z.W., R.Z. and L.L. wrote the manuscript, with input from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Heng Wu, Gil-Ho Lee, Hadar Steinberg, and Kam Tuen Law for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Le, T., Zhang, R., Li, C. et al. Magnetic field filtering of the boundary supercurrent in unconventional metal NiTe2-based Josephson junctions. Nat Commun 15, 2785 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47103-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47103-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.