Catalysis is inherently driven by the interaction of reactants, intermediates and formed products with the catalyst’s surface. In order to reach the desired transition state and to overcome the kinetic barrier, elevated temperatures or electrical potentials are employed to increase the rate of reaction. Despite immense efforts in the last decades, research in thermo- and electrocatalysis has often preceded in isolation, even for similar reactions. Conceptually, any heterogeneous surface process that involves changes in oxidation states, redox processes, adsorption of charged species (even as spectators) or heterolytic cleavage of small molecules should be thought of as having parallels with electrochemical processes occurring at electrified interfaces. Herein, we compare current trends in thermo- and electrocatalysis and elaborate on the commonalities and differences between both research fields, with a specific focus on the production of hydrogen peroxide as case study. We hope that interlinking both fields will be inspiring and thought-provoking, eventually creating synergies and leverage towards more efficient decentralized chemical conversion processes.
An ideal catalyst demonstrates high activity, stability, cost efficiency, and selectivity toward the targeted reaction. With the revived interest in electrocatalysis over recent years, more and more temperature-driven catalytic reactions have been targeted to be accelerated by electric potential. However, electro- and thermocatalysis have often developed in parallel rather than in collaboration, despite addressing common transformations such as oxygen reduction or hydrogen oxidation using Pt/Pd, CO2 reduction using Cu, alcohol oxidation using Au, or chlorine evolution/HCl oxidation on Ir and Ru oxides1,2,3,4. Analyzing thermal oxidation and reduction catalysis from an electrochemical view, any heterogeneous process involving changes in oxidation state, adsorption/desorption of charged species (even as spectators) or heterolytic cleavage of small molecules has parallels with electrochemistry (especially in the presence of liquid phase ionic species). In thermocatalysis, reaction temperature and pressure are used to control thermodynamic equilibrium and kinetics. In electrocatalysis, applied potential adds another parameter, with 1 V corresponding to nearly 100 kJ mol−1 change in free energy per electron.
Despite these parallels, few attempts have been made to bridge the gap, even for liquid phase redox processes with common materials between thermo- and electrocatalysis. As a notable exception, Spiro et al. investigated coupled oxidation-reduction reactions of ferrocyanide ([Fe(CN)6]3−+e−⇌[Fe(CN)6]4−) and iodide (3I−⇌I3− + 2e−) using supported Pt catalysts5,6,7,8,9. The overall rate was determined by the exchange of electrons between the reduction and oxidation reactions through Pt nanoparticles. This suggests that slow kinetics of either redox process limits the observed rate and serves as an early example of a thermal redox reaction involving electron transfer through a catalyst. Davis demonstrated that the role of molecular O2 during alcohol oxidation under basic conditions is to accept electrons from the metal to regenerate hydroxide ions—akin to an electrochemical ORR reaction10. Conceptually this can be considered as alcohol oxidation coupled to oxygen reduction. Recent studies have suggested proton-coupled-electron-transfer (PCET) mechanisms also operate in hydrogenation reactions. The mechanism of coupled hydrogen oxidation (H2 ⇌ 2H+ + 2e−) and C=C/C=O reduction in liquid phase has been suggested in furanic hydrogenation via water-mediated proton transfer11. Free energy calculations suggested that H2O participates directly in the kinetically relevant reaction step, and H2 bypasses the direct surface reaction with the furanic derivative via a PCET.
Extending this hypothesis, it should therefore be possible to separate the active sites of oxidation and reduction if there remains a path for charge transport. In the cases cited so far, this is through a metallic nanoparticle. This conceptual approach has been achieved with immobilized enzymatic-heterogeneous catalytic systems for hydrogenation reactions where H2 is oxidized to H+ with the reduction chemistry being carried out at the co-immobilized site12. By considering both, oxygen reduction and hydrogen oxidation as elementary steps, the electrocatalytic and thermal synthesis of H2O2 will be used as case study to elaborate on this approach.
Similarities in reaction mechanism between thermo- and electrocatalysis
Currently, >95% of H2O2 is produced by the anthraquinone oxidation process first established in 1939 (Fig. 1a)13. The high capital cost results in large-scale, centralized production where highly concentrated organic working solutions are produced. Subsequently, H2O2 has to be extracted and transported over large distances after which it is diluted again and this energy is often effectively wasted14,15. Distributed H2O2 manufacture at the point of use is becoming an attractive alternative and would allow production to be integrated into processes permitting (i) minimal time between H2O2 synthesis and use reducing storage requirements, (ii) potential to use stabilizer-free H2O2 for more efficient oxidation processes, (iii) increased raw material security, and (iv) process intensification.
The direct reaction of H2 and O2 using thermocatalysis (direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide, DSHP) is shown in Fig. 1b16. One major limitation is the precious metal content of the most efficient Pd and Pt catalysts, or their bi- and trimetallic alloys with Au17,18,19. However, the major limiting factor remains reaction selectivity to prevent water formation by direct combustion or over-hydrogenation and decomposition of H2O2. Another promising alternative is the electrochemical synthesis by a selective 2-electron oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); which is shown in Fig. 1c20. Similar to thermocatalysis, the design of more active and selective catalysts while decreasing the noble metal content remains a challenge. Pd catalysts dominate and the developed approaches to improve selectivity are similar in both fields. These include alloying to exploit electronic effects; site isolation to exploit geometric effects and selective surface blocking to control the concentration and orientation of surface species. Despite diverse reaction paths being possible in thermocatalytic reactions, the Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism is often proposed for DSHP, however, the role of charge transfer or changes in oxidation state often are not included in mechanistic steps21,22,23.
In general, higher yields of H2O2 can be achieved in acidic conditions or in the presence of protic solvents, however, little consideration is given the role of protons beyond stabilizing the formed H2O2. Choudhary was among the first to suggest a role of protons in H2O2 formation rather than surface H-atoms by publishing several studies using hydrazine in the absence of H2 over Pd catalysts and hydroxylamine over Au catalysts24,25,26. This demonstrated that stoichiometric reducing agents can be used in H2O2 production to supply H+/e−, drawing comparisons to electrochemical studies. Seraj et al. explicitly considered H2 as an electron donor in thermocatalytic nitrite reduction using AuPd catalysts, terminology that is often not considered in the discussion of thermocatalysis27. Abate et al. suggested protons hinder the breaking of the O-O bond favoring H2O2 formation over H2O (Fig. 1d), but also implicated protons as mechanistically relevant without consideration of similarities to electrochemical ORR/HOR28.
An alternative to the Langmuir model has been advanced by Wilson and Flaherty. Studying steady-state H2O2 formation rates over Pd, they found protic media was needed to produce H2O2 and that rates increased with [H+] drawing a definite dependence on protons in the rate-determining step. Based on this observation, the mechanism proposed is non-Langmuirian (Fig. 1e–g) where H2O2 is formed by a pathway that involves a water-mediated proton-electron transfer. More recently, Flaherty and co-workers studied the influence of redox mediators such as MeOH in the production of H2O229. The authors reported that protic solvents generate surface intermediates on Pd that efficiently deliver protons and electrons to catalytic sites. The reaction was reported to consist of spatially decoupled redox reactions with a short-range electron transfer within the metal Pd catalyst. The electrons for the ORR (O2 + 2H+ + 2e− ⇌ H2O2) are provided by the HOR (H2 ⇌ 2H+ + 2e−); thus, the two reactions can occur conceptually at two different sites provided that they are able to transfer electrons and bimetallic samples have shown consistent mechanistic features18,30. DFT studies on AuPd catalyst materials suggest that protonation of O2(ads) from water follows a low energy route for both metals; provided a proton shuttle could be set up using two water molecules. This suggests that protonation from solvent molecules represents a reaction pathway with barriers at least as low as the direct hydrogenation from H2. The entire process could be considered a sequence of elementary redox processes rather than a purely surface reaction between adsorbed H and O species, consistent with the studies of Ricciardulli et al. on dilute PdAu catalysts with a wide range of compositions31. Our own groups demonstrated that single Pd-atom catalysts are able to be highly active and selective in the electrochemical 2e- ORR and HOR and the direct synthesis reaction to produce H2O2 from molecular H2 and O232. Considering these liquid phase reactions as a sequence of elementary redox steps opens new approaches where physically separated half reactions with electrical connectivity can be viewed as fuel cells driven only by chemical potential. Here, the works of Yamanaka et al. can be interpreted as indications of this possibility. The authors described the reaction of H2 and O2 gases on physically separated electrodes to avoid mixing H2 and O233,34. Here, the HOR on Pt provided a source of protons and electrons that could be directed through an external circuit to drive the ORR.
These studies suggest that (i) if electron transfer through the metal is involved, electrochemical studies of thermocatalytic materials can undoubtedly add value to our common knowledge. Furthermore, (ii) the design of new catalysts could be thought of as coupling the most effective structures for the anodic and cathodic half reaction, allowing re-evaluation of materials that have been previously discarded because of activity for only one-half reaction, and (iii) new modes of operation and concepts in material design could be possible with coupled or decoupled sites for each of the ORR and HOR half reactions.
Deriving a common understanding
Metals such as Au that bind O2 or O-intermediates weakly tend to be highly selective toward H2O2. However, Au-based catalysts are associated with significant overpotentials (electrochemistry) or low H2 conversion (direct synthesis)35,36. Similarly, carbon-based materials are selective to H2O2 in the electrochemical ORR, however, are not active in heterogeneous reactions where H2 activation is required37,38,39,40. Therefore, it seems plausible that catalyst performance could be rationalized by studying the HOR/ORR for thermocatalytic materials electrochemically in isolation. Supporting this hypothesis, Flaherty and co-workers investigated Au-, Pd- and Pt-based catalysts and quantitatively demonstrated the mechanistic similarities between the direct synthesis of H2O2 and synchronous ORR and HOR electrochemistry41.
The exchange current density, i0, can be defined as the rate of the forward and reverse reactions at equilibrium, analogous to a rate constant in thermocatalysis. The equilibrium potential (Erev) of each half-cell reaction can be evaluated by thermodynamic considerations while the exchange current density and the Tafel slope account for kinetic contributions. A large I0 indicates a high level of readiness to proceed with a certain electrochemical reaction. Together with the transfer coefficient (α), Evans diagrams can be derived for a specific catalytic reaction which represents the reaction thermodynamics (potential) and the electrode’s kinetics of a half-cell reaction. These diagrams are common in corrosion science, yet, can be readily extended to coupled redox reactions in catalysis. Evans diagrams for a variety of catalysts for electrocatalytic HOR and ORR are compiled in Fig. 2a including for Pt (black curve) and gold (ochre). The i0 of HER and ORR for commonly used catalytic materials vary between ~10−13 A cm−2 (Hg)42,43, ~10−6 A cm−2 (Au)42,43, ~10−3 A cm−2 (Pd)42,43,44 and ~10−2 A cm−2 (Pt)44,45. Data concerning non-noble metal candidates was limited due to: (i) poor corrosion resistance under acidic conditions, (ii) unfavorable intermediate adsorption strengths, or (iii) the presence of passivating surface oxides leads to low activity.
Initially, without evaluating 2e− vs. 4e− oxygen reduction, we considered the exchange current densities of the 4e− reduction of oxygen to water. Knowing the transfer coefficient allows the exchange current at mixed potentials to be determined in analogy to galvanic processes and is defined as catalytic current density (jcat) and catalytic potential (Ecat). The catalytic potential is the intermediate potential determined by the intersection of the cathodic branch (e.g., ORR) with the anodic branch (e.g., HOR) indicated by the blue line in Fig. 2a shown for Pt. At Ecat, the rate of oxygen reduction is equal to the rate of hydrogen oxidation. Thus, if the exchange current density and the Tafel slopes of each half-cell reaction are known, it should be possible to predict the catalytic behavior in thermocatalysis.
Conceptually, the higher the catalytic current density between the coupled HOR–ORR redox reactions at relevant conditions, the higher the maximum rate achievable in DSHP reaction (considering overall O2 reduction to both H2O2 and H2O). The reaction rate is therefore limited by the smallest contribution to the ORR/HOR couple. As a benchmark, TOF (h−1) and yields (mol kg−1 h−1) for the selected heterogeneous catalysts are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Intriguingly, materials such as Au or Ag possess relatively low catalytic current densities as the half-cell kinetics for the HOR are poor (hypothetically shown in Fig. 2b)41. However, due to low H2O2 residence time and the subsequent hindrance of oxygen adsorption, they tend to demonstrate high selectivity. Despite the relatively low ORR exchange current densities of Au, the reported TOFs are often comparable to metals such as Pt in reactions without acid and halide additives which have larger exchange currents (hypothetically shown in Fig. 2c) but likely for different reasons (Au—low conversion and high selectivity, Pt—high conversion low selectivity). The reason for this difference can also be qualitatively explained from existing electrochemical studies. Over hydrogenation and H2O2 decomposition takes place due to the high activity for H2 activation or HOR on Pt compared to Au coupled with strong binding of O-intermediates. The comparison of existing materials hints strongly to the possibility that catalysts can be evaluated separately in half-cells through quick, electrochemical screening and suitable material combinations with electronic connectivity can be combined. However, limitations in comparability between thermo- and electrocatalysis must also be considered.
Limits in the comparability
The presumably greatest limitation of comparing both fields lies in their different reaction environments. Most electrochemical approaches are based on using standard conditions for temperature (298.15 K) and pressure (1 bar) in the presence of a conductive and acidic electrolyte with typically low rates of reactant diffusion. High reaction rates in the direct synthesis are also typically limited by reactant solubility in aqueous or alcohol/aqueous based solvent systems. For thermocatalytic systems, working pressures up to 40 bar are common (containing H2 and O2 mixtures in a diluent such as N2 or CO2) and sub-ambient temperatures are often utilized especially in the absence of acid or halide additives to stabilize H2O2.
The exchange current density i0 also strongly depends on the solution composition adjacent to the electrode’s surface and can be expressed by Eq. 1.
\({i}_{0}\left({{{{{\rm{T}}}}}}^{*},{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}_{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}^{* },{{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}_{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}^{* }\right)\) [A \({{{{{{\rm{cm}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{real}}}}}}}^{-2}\)] as exchange current density at defined reference temperature and reference reactant/product \(({{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}_{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}^{* },\,{{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}_{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}^{* })\) concentrations, γ, δ as reaction order and Eact as activation energy of the exchange current density46. From Eq. 1, the temperature and the surface concentrations can have drastic effects on i0. Butler-Volmer kinetics dictate a linear relationship of Tafel slope (b) and temperature, however, a linear dependency of b and T is not always found47. The reasons for this have been reported to range from the expansion of the inner region of the double layer with temperature, variable temperature-dependent adsorption of spectator species, structural solvent changes, or to altered solvation spheres around reactant ions46. Additionally, diffusion limitation might be depicted as concentration polarization exemplarily shown in Fig. 2d for the HOR. Here, the reaction of H2 at large overpotentials may cause a depletion of gas and the transport of H2 to the catalyst’s surface becomes diffusion limited resulting in the shown concentration polarization, effecting directly icat and Ecat. In principle, these limitations could also be measured by electrochemical means. However, in order to allow useful correlation between both fields, interfacial effects in electrocatalysis such as oriented water dipoles, present ions, non-covalent intermediate/water interactions, and the electric field have to be comparably small and Sabatier’s principle (binding intermediates not too strongly and not too weakly) dominates the reaction mechanism. This is often the case as shown by modeling electrochemical processes by conducting gas-phase calculations on well-defined catalytic surfaces48,49,50.
Conclusion
Overall, comparing both fields, the thermo- and electrocatalytic H2O2 production reveal many similarities. For both reactions, the catalyst selection narrows down to similar materials, mainly Pd and Pt-based materials. Intriguingly, more materials for the electrocatalytic ORR have been reported that do not appear in the thermocatalytic synthesis of H2O2. The reason might lie in a non-Langmuirian reaction mechanism where spatially decoupled redox reactions take place. Specifically, the ORR acts as electron sink provided for the hydrogen oxidation reaction when both are electronically connected. These observations are supported by the compilation of potential–current density diagrams that can be used to bridge the gap between both fields. Moreover, the selection of catalyst material is generally dictated by activity considerations only, while strategies to increase the selectivity are often lacking. Further enhancement of the overall performance will greatly rely on the joint optimization of both catalytic properties, eventually guided by the investigations of half-reactions via electrochemical methods. In general, this approach of combining know-how from thermo- and electrocatalysis that has been laid out for the example of H2O2 synthesis can be adapted to a wide range of reactions including oxidation and reduction processes at interfaces. Developments along this path can be mutually beneficial, leading to more efficient chemical technologies and novel applications.
References
Kulkarni, A., Siahrostami, S., Patel, A. & Norskov, J. K. Understanding catalytic activity trends in the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev. 118, 2302–2312 (2018).
Li, C. W. & Kanan, M. W. CO2 reduction at low overpotential on Cu electrodes resulting from the reduction of thick Cu2O films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7231–7234 (2012).
Pritchard, J. et al. Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide and benzyl alcohol oxidation using Au-Pd catalysts prepared by sol immobilization. Langmuir 26, 16568–16577 (2010).
Vos, J. G. et al. Selectivity trends between oxygen evolution and chlorine evolution on iridium-based double perovskites in acidic media. ACS Catal. 9, 8561–8574 (2019).
Ravnö, A. B. & Spiro, M. 16. Heterogeneous catalysis in solution. Part III. Heterogeneous catalysis and other types of interaction between metals and oxidation–reduction reactions. J. Chem. Soc. 0, 97–100 (1965).
Spiro, M. The heterogeneous catalysis by metals of electron-transfer reactions in solution. J. Chem. Soc., 3678–3679 (1960).
Spiro, M. Heterogeneous catalysis in solution. Part 17.—Kinetics of oxidation–reduction reaction catalysed by electron transfer through the solid: an electrochemical treatment. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 F. 75, 1507–1512 (1979).
Spiro, M. & Griffin, P. W. Proof of an electron-transfer mechanism by which metals can catalyse oxidation-reduction reactions. J. Chem. Soc. D, 262b–263b (1969).
Spiro, M. & Ravnö, A. B. 15. Heterogeneous catalysis in solution. Part II. The effect of platinum on oxidation–reduction reactions. J. Chem. Soc. 0, 78–96 (1965).
Zope, B. N., Hibbitts, D. D., Neurock, M. & Davis, R. J. Reactivity of the gold/water interface during selective oxidation catalysis. Science 330, 74–78 (2010).
Zhao, Z. et al. Solvent-mediated charge separation drives alternative hydrogenation path of furanics in liquid water. Nat. Catal. 2, 431–436 (2019).
Rowbotham, J. S., Ramirez, M. A., Lenz, O., Reeve, H. A. & Vincent, K. A. Bringing biocatalytic deuteration into the toolbox of asymmetric isotopic labelling techniques. Nat. Commun. 11, 1454 (2020).
Rledl, H. J. & Pfleiderer, G. Production of hydrogen peroxide. US2158525A (1939).
Chen, Q. Development of an anthraquinone process for the production of hydrogen peroxide in a trickle bed reactor—From bench scale to industrial scale. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 47, 787–792 (2008).
Campos-Martin, J. M., Blanco-Brieva, G. & Fierro, J. L. G. Hydrogen peroxide synthesis: an outlook beyond the anthraquinone process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 6962–6984 (2006).
Henkel, H. & Weber, W. US Patent 1. 1,108,752 (1914).
Xu, J. et al. Pt promotional effects on Pd–Pt alloy catalysts for hydrogen peroxide synthesis directly from hydrogen and oxygen. J. Catal. 285, 74–82 (2012).
Wilson, N. M., Priyadarshini, P., Kunz, S. & Flaherty, D. W. Direct synthesis of H2O2 on Pd and AuxPd1 clusters: Understanding the effects of alloying Pd with Au. J. Catal. 357, 163–175 (2018). From the evaluation of DSHP under different reaction conditions (reactant pressure, temperature, and solvent), it is suggested that H2O2 is formed on AuxPd1 clusters by a proton-electron transfer mechanism.
Li, J., Ishihara, T. & Yoshizawa, K. Theoretical revisit of the direct synthesis of H2O2 on Pd and Au@Pd surfaces: a comprehensive mechanistic study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 115, 25359–25367 (2011).
Yang, S. et al. Toward the decentralized electrochemical production of H2O2: a focus on the catalysis. ACS Catal. 8, 4064–4081 (2018).
Piccinini, M. et al. Effect of the reaction conditions on the performance of Au-Pd/TiO(2) catalyst for the direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 2488–2492 (2010).
Ford, D. C., Nilekar, A. U., Xu, Y. & Mavrikakis, M. Partial and complete reduction of O2 by hydrogen on transition metal surfaces. Surf. Sci. 604, 1565–1575 (2010).
Voloshin, Y., Halder, R. & Lawal, A. Kinetics of hydrogen peroxide synthesis by direct combination of H2 and O2 in a microreactor. Catal. Today 125, 40–47 (2007).
Choudhary, V. R., Jana, P. & Bhargava, S. K. Reduction of oxygen by hydroxylammonium salt or hydroxylamine over supported Au nanoparticles for in situ generation of hydrogen peroxide in aqueous or non-aqueous medium. Catal. Commun. 8, 811–816 (2007).
Choudhary, V. R., Jana, P. & Samanta, C. Generation of hydrogen peroxide via the selective reduction of oxygen by hydrazine sulfate over Br-promoted Pd/Al2O3 catalyst in an aqueous medium at ambient conditions. Appl. Catal., A 323, 202–209 (2007). The role of protons and halides in the DSHP were investigated in acidic media using hydrazine in the absence of H2 over Pd catalysts and hydroxylamine over Au catalysts.
Choudhary, V. R., Samanta, C. & Jana, P. A novel route for in-situ H2O2 generation from selective reduction of O2 by hydrazine using heterogeneous Pd catalyst in an aqueous medium. Chem. Commun. 43, 5399–5401 (2005). The study demonstrated that stoichiometric amounts of reducing agent in acidic conditions can be used to supply H+/e−.
Seraj, S. et al. PdAu alloy nanoparticle catalysts: effective candidates for nitrite reduction in water. ACS Catal. 7, 3268–3276 (2017).
Abate, S. et al. The issue of selectivity in the direct synthesis of H2O2 from H2 and O2: the role of the catalyst in relation to the kinetics of reaction. Top. Catal. 38, 181–193 (2006). It was suggested that protons present at the solid/liquid interface are mechanistically relevant for the direct synthesis of H2O2.
Adams, J. S. et al. Solvent molecules form surface redox mediators in situ and cocatalyze O2 reduction on Pd. Science. 371, 626–632 (2021).
Wilson, N. M. et al. Direct synthesis of H2O2 on AgPt octahedra: the importance of Ag–Pt coordination for high H2O2 selectivity. ACS Catal. 8, 2880–2889 (2018).
Ricciardulli, T. et al. Effect of Pd coordination and isolation on the catalytic reduction of O2 to H2O2 over PdAu bimetallic nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 5445–5464 (2021).
Ledendecker, M. et al. Isolated Pd sites as selective catalysts for electrochemical and direct hydrogen peroxide synthesis. ACS Catal. 10, 5928–5938 (2020). First paper to use electrochemistry to provide a selective material for DSHP.
Otsuka, K. & Yamanaka, I. One step synthesis of hydrogen peroxide through fuel cell reaction. Electrochim. Acta 35, 319–322 (1990).
Yamanaka, I., Onizawa, T., Takenaka, S. & Otsuka, K. Direct and continuous production of hydrogen peroxide with 93% selectivity using a fuel-cell system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3653–3655 (2003).
Zurilla, R. W., Sen, R. K. & Yeager, E. The kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction on gold in alkaline solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 1103–1109 (2019).
Pizzutilo, E. et al. Electrocatalytic synthesis of hydrogen peroxide on Au-Pd nanoparticles: From fundamentals to continuous production. Chem. Phys. Lett. 683, 436–442 (2017).
Siahrostami, S. et al. Enabling direct H2O2 production through rational electrocatalyst design. Nat. Mater. 12, 1137–1143 (2013).
Verdaguer-Casadevall, A. et al. Trends in the electrochemical synthesis of H2O2: enhancing activity and selectivity by electrocatalytic site engineering. Nano Lett. 14, 1603–1608 (2014).
Kim, H. W. et al. Efficient hydrogen peroxide generation using reduced graphene oxide-based oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 282–290 (2018).
Lu, Z. et al. High-efficiency oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide catalysed by oxidized carbon materials. Nat. Catal. 1, 156–162 (2018).
Adams, J. S., Kromer, M. L., Rodriguez-Lopez, J. & Flaherty, D. W. Unifying concepts in electro- and thermocatalysis toward hydrogen peroxide production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 7940–7957 (2021).
Trasatti, S. Work function, electronegativity, and electrochemical behaviour of metals. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 39, 163–184 (1972).
Conway, B. E. & Tilak, B. V. Interfacial processes involving electrocatalytic evolution and oxidation of H2, and the role of chemisorbed H. Electrochim. Acta 47, 3571–3594 (2002).
Durst, J. et al. New insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2255–2260 (2014).
Neyerlin, K. C., Gu, W., Jorne, J. & Gasteiger, H. A. Study of the exchange current density for the hydrogen oxidation and evolution reactions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, B631–B635 (2007).
Newman, J. & Thomas-Alyea, K. E. Electrochemical Systems (Wiley, 2004).
Conway, B. E., White, R. E. & Bockris, J. O. M. Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry 16 (Springer US, 1985).
Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).
Norskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J. & Christensen, C. H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 37–46 (2009).
Norskov, J. K., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F. & Bligaard, T. Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 937–943 (2011).
Wilson, N. M. & Flaherty, D. W. Mechanism for the direct synthesis of H2O2 on Pd clusters: heterolytic reaction pathways at the liquid–solid interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 574–586 (2016).
Acknowledgements
G.V.F. gratefully acknowledges financial support by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – grants #2017/10118-0 and #2019/04421-7), K.J.J.M. and M.L. acknowledge the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) of Germany in the framework of POREForm (project number 0 03ETB027G) for funding. S.J.F. acknowledges the award of a Prize Research Fellowship from the University of Bath. M.L. acknowledges the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of NanoMatFutur (SynKat) for financial support (project number 03XP0265). We would like to thank MAXNET Energy for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: G.V.F., S.J.F., and M.L. Writing original draft: G.V.F., S.J.F., and M.L. Writing – review and editing: G.V.F., S.J.F., M.L., E.P., I.K., D.G., R.J.L., K.J.J.M., and G.J.H.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fortunato, G.V., Pizzutilo, E., Katsounaros, I. et al. Analysing the relationship between the fields of thermo- and electrocatalysis taking hydrogen peroxide as a case study. Nat Commun 13, 1973 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29536-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29536-6
This article is cited by
-
An electrochemical approach for designing thermochemical bimetallic nitrate hydrogenation catalysts
Nature Catalysis (2024)
-
Theoretical framework for mixed-potential-driven catalysis
Communications Chemistry (2024)
-
Electrochemistry-inspired design of thermocatalysts
Nature Catalysis (2024)