Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Importance of post-seismic viscous relaxation in southern Iceland

Abstract

Large earthquakes change the distribution of stress in the crust, leading to aftershocks and triggered earthquakes. Several time-dependent processes, such as the flow of pore fluid1, post-seismic slip (also termed afterslip)2,3 and viscous relaxation of the lower crust and upper mantle4,5 may further alter the state of stress in the crust and thereby influence the occurrence of future earthquakes. However, distinguishing between these processes on the basis of field observations has prove to be difficult because models of the different processes can predict similar ground displacements and multiple processes may be acting concurrently6,7,8. Here, I compare results of time-series analysis of satellite radar interferograms and modelling calculations to show that multi-year ground movements following two magnitude 6.5 earthquakes in southwest Iceland were most likely driven by viscous relaxation. Viscoelastic models of a strong lower crust and a weak upper mantle can explain the magnitude as well as the pattern of the deformation, whereas afterslip models are by themselves not compatible with the observations. These results suggest that afterslip—which is an important process on mature faults2,3—may not play as significant a role in young and immature fault zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Post-seismic ground displacements after two magnitude 6.5 earthquakes in southwest Iceland.
Figure 2: Afterslip and viscoelastic model predictions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peltzer, G., Rosen, P., Rogez, F. & Hudnut, K. Poro-elastic rebound along the Landers 1992 earthquake surface rupture. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 30131–30145 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bürgmann, R. et al. Time-space variable afterslip on and deep below the Izmit earthquake rupture. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 126–137 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Freed, A. M. Afterslip (and only afterslip) following the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L06312 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pollitz, F. F., Wicks, C. & Thatcher, W. Mantle flow beneath a continental strike-slip fault: post-seismic deformation after the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake. Science 293, 1814–1818 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freed, A. M. & Lin, J. Delayed triggering of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake by viscoelastic stress transfer. Nature 411, 180–183 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hearn, E. H. What can GPS tell us about the dynamics of postseismic deformation? Geophys. J. Int. 155, 753–777 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fialko, Y. Evidence of fluid-filled upper crust from observations of postseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B0841 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freed, A. M., Bürgmann, R., Calais, E., Freymueller, J. & Hreinsdóttir, S. Implications of deformation following the 2002 Denali, Alaska, earthquake for postseismic relaxation processes and lithospheric rehology. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B01401 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sigmundsson, F., Einarsson, P., Bilham, R. & Sturkell, E. Rift-transform kinematics in south Iceland: Deformation from Global Positioning System measurements, 1986 and 1992. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6235–6248 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Árnadóttir, T., Jiang, W., Feigl, K. L., Geirsson, H. & Sturkell, E. Kinematic models of plate boundary deformation in southwest Iceland derived from GPS observations. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B07402 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Einarsson, P. Earthquakes and present-day tectonism in Iceland. Tectonophysics 189, 261–279 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pedersen, R., Jónsson, S., Árnadóttir, T., Sigmundsson, F. & Feigl, K. Fault slip distribution of two Mw=6.5 earthquakes in Southern Iceland estimated from joint inversion of InSAR and GPS measurements. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 213, 487–502 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jónsson, S., Segall, P., Pedersen, R. & Björnsson, G. Post-earthquake ground movements correlated to pore-pressure transients. Nature 424, 179–183 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Árnadóttir, T., Jónsson, S., Pollitz, F. F., Jiang, W. & Feigl, K. L. Postseismic deformation following the June 2000 earthquake sequence in the south Iceland seismic zone. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B12308 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Savage, J. C. & Svarc, J. L. Postseismic deformation associated with the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers earthquake, southern California. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 7565–7577 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deng, J., Gurnis, M., Kanamori, H. & Hauksson, E. Viscoelastic flow in the lower crust after the 1992 Landers, California earthquake. Science 282, 1689–1692 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R. & Sansosti, E. A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 40, 2375–2383 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollitz, F. F. Gravitational-viscoelastic postseismic relaxation on a layered spherical Earth. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17921–17941 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stefánsson, R. et al. Earthquake prediction research in the south Iceland seismic zone and the SIL project. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83, 696–716 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bjarnason, I. T., Menke, W., Flóvenz, Ó. G. & Caress, D. Tomographic image of the mid-Atlantic plate boundary in southwestern Iceland. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6607–6622 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pollitz, F. F. & Sacks, I. S. Viscosity structure beneath northeast Iceland. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 17771–17793 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, K. M., Bürgmann, R. & Larson, K. Frictional properties on the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California, inferred from models of afterslip following the 2004 earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S321–S338 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johanson, I. A., Fielding, E. J., Rolandone, F. & Bürgmann, R. Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S269–S282 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Townend, J. & Zoback, M. D. Regional tectonic stress near the San Andreas fault in central and southern California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L15S11 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clifton, A. & Einarsson, P. Styles of surface rupture accompanying the June 17 and 21, 2000 earthquakes in the Southern Iceland Seismic Zone. Tectonophysics 396, 141–159 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank T. Árnadóttir for discussions and for providing GPS data14 and J. Hoffmann for his contribution during the early phase of this work. This project was funded by the Icelandic Centre of Research. The radar data were provided by the European Space Agency through Category-1 project No. 3846.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigurjón Jónsson.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary figures S1-S4 (PDF 1970 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jónsson, S. Importance of post-seismic viscous relaxation in southern Iceland. Nature Geosci 1, 136–139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo105

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing