Commentary in 2015

Filter By:

Article Type
Year
  • Cryo-EM has emerged rapidly as a method for determining high-resolution structures of biological macromolecules. The author of this Commentary discusses just how much better this technology may get and how fast such developments are likely to happen.

    • Robert M Glaeser
    Commentary
  • Quality control of cell lines used in biomedical research is essential to ensure reproducibility. Although cell line authentication has been widely recommended for many years, misidentification, including cross-contamination, remains a serious problem. We outline a multi-stakeholder, incremental approach and policy-related recommendations to facilitate change in the culture of cell line authentication.

    • Leonard P Freedman
    • Mark C Gibson
    • Yvonne A Reid
    Commentary
  • Scientific animations have tremendous potential as instruments of insight and dissemination. However, audiences are often unable to determine the degree to which visualizations are informed by scientific evidence. By providing a more detailed account of source use, developers can increase the credibility of animations as scientific tools.

    • Stuart G Jantzen
    • Jodie Jenkinson
    • Gaël McGill
    Commentary
  • The reliability and reproducibility of science are under scrutiny. However, a major cause of this lack of repeatability is not being considered: the wide sample-to-sample variability in the P value. We explain why P is fickle to discourage the ill-informed practice of interpreting analyses based predominantly on this statistic.

    • Lewis G Halsey
    • Douglas Curran-Everett
    • Gordon B Drummond
    Commentary